Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



‘Official’ Jewish community thinking about Israel…

bodVivian Wineman, President, Board of Deputies, Briefs the Community on the Flotilla Episode

UJIA chief: More collaboration between Jews and Israel

Vivian Wineman, President, Board of Deputies, Briefs the Community on the Flotilla Episode

Although a week has passed since last week’s tragic Flotilla episode our emotions are still raw. As a community we have felt impotent as the rights and wrongs of this affair have been disingenuously played out on the world stage with one clear, propaganda narrative emerging – the now in-vogue, prejudiced narrative demonising Israel as a rogue state which has lost its moral compass.

Once again we see the disproportionate attention paid to Israel while larger more significant conflicts, some involving far greater loss of life, are virtually ignored. The community, Jews throughout the Diaspora and in Israel ask why there is such selective outrage against Israel and such demonisation of the State and its citizens.

There is no doubt that Israel has taken a beating to her already declining reputation. It is not within this communication that I seek to explore just how, where and when this occurred. Rather, to offer a reminder that irrespective of that, as Jews, Israel resides at the core of our concerns whatever we make of her policies, actions and Government.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews is not a mouthpiece for the Israeli government to defend Israeli policy, but the Board is committed both by its Constitution and by the intense commitment of its leaders and members to “take such appropriate action as lies within its power to advance Israel’s security, welfare and standing”. We do so within a framework that acutely recognises the divergent views that comprise the unique fabric of this community. At this time of crisis we are here to make sense out of a situation that is complex, difficult, controversial and confusing.

But it is not just because of this moral obligation. Events in the Middle East impinge directly on our community through antisemitism – both verbal and physical – as we sadly saw in last year’s CST statistics.

The level of disbelief and misunderstanding of Israel’s predicament permeated not only most of the media but was reflected in the Parliamentary exchanges in the House of Commons last week, and the views articulated suggest a worrying shift both in policy and approach towards Israel.

To combat those trends we need your direct help and that of as many of those in your community. We call on the entire community to join us in our huge undertaking by doing what we can to set the record straight and to assist opinion formers and policy makers, media and Government alike, with the facts – helping them differentiate between fact and fiction, and between fact and propaganda.

Amid all the calls for enquiry some facts are undoubted:

• Israel, like any other sovereign state, has an inherent right of self defence and a duty to protect her citizens especially against ongoing rocket attacks from Gaza.

• The rocket attacks against towns and cities in southern Israel have continued throughout the last months, four were fired last Thursday night and one reached Ashkelon on Friday evening.

• The maritime blockade of Gaza has to a considerable degree protected Israel’s citizens from recent lethal rocket attacks launched from Gaza but does not stop them entirely .

• While not ideal, Israel not only offers and continues to provide other routes through which humanitarian aid can reach Palestinian civilians in Gaza, but all of the aid taken off the flotilla last week has lain in Ashdod port simply because Hamas has refused permission for its delivery.

• Israel is delivering truck loads of supplies on a daily basis – mostly in conjunction with various aid agencies to ensure it is made available to those most in need. Details of the items and quantities are regularly published disproving the wilder and often false claims by some of those quoted last week.

• Despite reports to the contrary, building materials are sent in from Israel but only given to agencies such as UNWRA to ensure they do not get misappropriated by Hamas for protecting their fighters and rocket launching sites.

• Last week’s flotilla episode was nothing to do with delivering humanitarian aid and everything to do with making a propagandist political statement. The fact that there was a violent outcome is regarded by Hamas as a victory.

• Whatever the wisdom of the operation mounted by the Israeli Navy, the extreme violence displayed towards the commandos including the kidnapping of three of them and the attempted murder of one of them left the remaining commandos in an impossible position in which clearly their lives were in grave danger.

• It was revealing that on none of the other five boats in the flotilla were there any similar incidents, but those on the Turkish vessel were armed and ready to create an incident, knowing full well that it would gain the world’s attention.

• Those passengers on the Marmara who engaged the commandos were reportedly not human rights activists but hard line Islamists, many of whom have close links with or are members of the IHH, which itself allegedly has links with Hamas. And at least two of whom it is known had left behind notes wishing for martyrdom.

• If Hamas desires an end to the blockade, it must cease all terrorist activity and declare an intention to live in peace with Israel.

Last week’s actions have clearly caused Israel serious diplomatic damage. The British Government rightly articulates the need for the people of Gaza to live in peace with all the sustenance and aid fundamental to the integrity and well being of any human being. These human rights are basic, cannot be ignored and must be resolved which is why our Government must not lose sight of Hamas’ tyrannical rule and record of human rights abuses against ordinary Palestinian citizens in Gaza. Moreover the government has stressed its support for Resolution 1860 which calls on all member states (including the UK) to prevent illicit trafficking in arms and ammunition to Hamas. The best way to open the Gaza’s borders is to procure an end to this trafficking.

Equally, the Board will continue its role in lobbying key ministers on the issue of Hamas’ terrorist activity, so that the human rights of Israel’s citizens are also valued and protected together with those of the people of Gaza.

Consensus amongst British Jews is that this is a heartbreaking situation, which is why our community cannot remain silent at this crucial time. We can all make a difference by ensuring that we are fully briefed, lobbying our MPs and other representatives and ensuring so far as we are able that Israel’s case is put in the media. The Board will arrange briefings for Deputies both in person in Parliament and via email. In the meantime you may wish to visit the following websites:


UJIA chief: More collaboration between Jews and Israel

By Simon Rocker, June 17, 2010

One of Israel’s leading supporters has demanded a greater “collaboration” between Israel and diaspora Jews.

Writing in today’s JC, Mick Davis, chairman of both the UJIA and the executive committee of the Jewish Leadership Council, says that “whereas an Israeli can at least influence events through the ballot box, we are a simple recipient of their impact”.

He asserts that “we have a legitimate role as a partner with Israel in developing” its long term strategy.

Israel, he writes, is a “cornerstone” of the identity of most Jews in the diaspora and central to their future.

We need to show people how to face the challenges

His words will be seen as a barely coded attack on Israel’s dismissal of diaspora views about the Middle East.

Mr Davis heads British Jewry’s biggest charitable investor in Israel, which spends more than £15 million a year on projects there, Zionist youth groups and other Israel-related programmes.

He also urges British Jews to recognise there are different views about the country’s policies and to encourage, rather than stifle, debate. He warns against a retreat into “a defensive, ever-shrinking circle”.

It is, he argues, “almost impossible” for Israel’s friends to offer consistent support if leaders do not present a clear strategy for solving the conflict with the Palestinians.

While mainstream Jews include vocal supporters, others, he says, are privately critical or love Israel while being publicly critical and “sometimes accused of being self-haters”.

If young Jews are to take pride in their relationship with Israel, “we must equip them to deal with the complexities and challenges they perceive in an honest and open way.

“That means acknowledging and confronting the schisms which exist in Israeli society, as in all societies; accepting that there is a range of views on Israel’s foreign policy and stimulating rather than stifling debate.”

He writes that Israel’s friends “cannot easily see the road Israel wishes to travel.

“If they cannot see it, they cannot defend the tactics, making it almost impossible to provide credible and consistent support.

“It is important now for Israel to define a strategic solution in its own terms; it should be about what is right, moral and legitimate for the Jewish state, rather than what is wrong with her neighbours.”

Mr Davis’s intervention comes amid increasing signs of diaspora unease over Israeli policies, most visibly expressed in the recent J Call and For the Sake of Zion petitions in Europe and the United States that urged a settlement freeze.

Most Israelis still expect Jewish organisations outside to support the government, according to a poll for the B’nai B’rith International’s centre in Jerusalem. More than half felt pro-Israel organisations should support Israeli policy. Only 28 per cent did not.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.