
Nickolay Mladenov as the UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process in September 2018
Ahmed Abdel Rahman writes in The Palestine Chronicle on 26 May 2026:
Sometimes political leaders must take off the soft gloves they wear while managing the affairs of their people and put on rougher, harsher ones instead. Continuing to act with excessive conciliation and goodwill in matters of destiny can have disastrous consequences—especially when dealing with adversaries who show no loyalty to promises and no commitment to agreements or accords.
Following the ceasefire agreement reached on October 10 of last year, the Palestinian side appeared to display the highest degree of commitment and discipline. For more than six and a half months, despite the losses it endured, the resistance chose to deny the Zionist enemy any opportunity to reignite the war. During that period, Israel committed more than 3,000 violations, resulting in the killing of over 700 Palestinians, including senior leaders of resistance factions.
In Israel, this Palestinian restraint and the absence of any significant retaliation were interpreted as signs of weakness within the resistance in Gaza. Israeli leaders came to believe that the structure and military capabilities of the resistance had been damaged to such an extent that it had become incapable of taking meaningful action against the occupation army. This perception was reflected in a clear increase in Israeli violations—not only in number but also in their scale and severity.
Whether this Israeli understanding reflects reality or stems from a dangerous miscalculation ultimately changes little. The result has been the same: Israeli leaders have become emboldened to escalate their aggression against Gaza, carrying out assassinations, killings, and further land confiscations without hesitation and increasingly without justification, unlike during the first months of the already fragile ceasefire agreement.