Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011




Rift in German-Israeli Association

speigel-onlineGerman Politicians Under Fire for Criticizing Israel

A dispute is brewing in the German-Israeli Association over a fundamental question: How openly should German politicians be allowed to criticize the policies of the Jewish state?

Sven Becker & Christoph Schult,, 23 February 2011

Dirk Niebel, a member of Germany’s pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP), isn’t known for his reticence. But when it comes to criticizing Israel, Niebel, who spent a year living in a kibbutz as a young man, has always been cautious. As a sign of his solidarity, he became vice-president of the German-Israeli Association (DIG), a staunchly pro-Israeli group, in 2000. It was a close relationship, at least until last year.

As Germany’s Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development, he had planned a trip to the Gaza Strip last June to tour a sewage treatment plant in Palestinian territory funded by the German government. When the Israelis denied him access to the plant, Niebel referred to the decision as a “major foreign policy mistake.” In the heat of the moment, he added that “time is running out” for Israel.

The loudest criticism of his undiplomatic statement did not come from Jerusalem, but from the home front, namely from several fellow members of the DIG. “Niebel should have known that Israel, given the tense situation, has little understanding for demonstrative visits, no matter how well-intentioned,” chided DIG officials Claudia Korenke and Jochen Feilcke.

Since then there has been a fundamental dispute among Israel supporters over the direction of their movement, a dispute fraught with insults and accusations. It revolves around power, positions and the question of how much criticism of Israel’s policy should be allowed among its friends.

Historical Obligation

Because of the Holocaust and Germany’s responsibility for World War II, solidarity with the Jewish state founded in 1948 is a fundamental tenet of German policy. Israel’s security is “part of my country’s raison d’être,” Merkel said in a speech to the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, in 2008.

Since the establishment of the DIG in 1966, supporting the institution has been seen as the right thing to do in German politics. Its members include former Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping, former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer and former Labor Minister Norbert Blüm. Reinhold Robbe, the former commissioner for the federal armed forces, is the group’s chairman. The DIG receives financial support from the federal government and has close ties to the Israeli embassy. All parties with seats in the German parliament, the Bundestag, except the Left Party, appoint a vice-president to the DIG.

But the association’s current behavior is anything but friendly. The dispute erupted after the Israeli army boarded a Turkish ship carrying aid supplies for the Palestinians last May. Nine people died in the incident, and the Israeli actions were criticized worldwide. The Bundestag, the lower house of the German parliament, also adopted a unanimous resolution demanding that Israel lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip, much to the irritation of the fundamentalists in the DIG surrounding Feilcke, a former member of parliament for the CDU.

The 68-year-old, chairman of the DIG group for Berlin and nearby Potsdam, says: “Israel is a thorn in the flesh of an undemocratic world. It needs our full support.”

Feilcke doesn’t like it when Niebel criticizes Israel, but he was even more irate over the Bundestag resolution, which the DIG vice-presidents supported. “I thought there was something wrong with them,” he says.

‘Up to Your Knees in Ideology’

At the association’s annual meeting in the fall, Feilcke and his allies demanded the ouster of the members of parliament from their positions as DIG vice-presidents. When he failed, Feilcke resigned from the board. But he has no intention of giving up the fight. In a piece in the upcoming issue of the DIG’s magazine, Feilcke argues that the organization must support positions “independently of Bundestag resolutions or decisions at party conventions.”

“People like Feilcke are no longer in office, and that’s a good thing,” says Niebel. Marieluise Beck, a member of parliament for the Green Party and one of the DIG vice-presidents, complains about “party line enforcers” who shouldn’t even be in the DIG.

Beck wrote an essay for the DIG to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the State of Israel. At the end, she wrote about the “occupation policy” in Palestine and said it was a “gift” that Israelis and Germans could discuss such issues today.

But Beck did not expect the emotionally charged objections that followed. “It’s hard to imagine how I’m being attacked by some members of the DIG,” says Beck. For weeks, she received emails questioning her friendship to Israel. The politician, who has served for many years in the German-Israeli group of parliamentarians. and on the board of the DIG, is now convinced that “whenever you make a statement, you’re up to your knees in ideology.”

Niebel has drawn his own conclusions. “Friendship with Israel doesn’t mean blind obedience,” says the minister. “It’s okay to tell Israel when it’s making mistakes, behind the scenes at first, but if that doesn’t work, then publicly.”

At the last annual meeting, Niebel, citing time constraints, decided not to seek another term as a DIG vice-president. “But the criticism also made it an easier departure for me,” he said.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.