JFJFP

Israel’s army is falling apart. It must be rebuilt from scratch

An Israeli soldier sits on a tank, near the border with Gaza, 13 August 2025

Yitzhak Brik writes in Haaretz on 20 August 2025:

I shall begin by quoting Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva, in leaked audio released by Channel 12 News Friday: “This is something much deeper, spanning many, many years.”

According to Haliva, the intelligence failure of October 7 “requires a much deeper correction. It’s not a matter of a personnel change – we’ll replace the [military] chief of staff and then everything will go back to being good again. I’m opposed to the notion of saying that it was an accident. There are those who say, ‘You were driving your car, you hit traffic spikes; we’ll come and replace all four tires and you can keep traveling.’ I’m saying that what happened to us is much more, and it requires dismantling and reassembly.”

Haliva later explained, “For everything that happens, you find an explanation for in your doctrine. There is a responsibility here for over the course of years for a total strategic understanding that says … our enemy is deterred, at the same time we will calm it Qatari money. I didn’t understand; those who came before me didn’t understand.”

I have long criticized harshly the state of Israel’s ground forces and their organizational culture. There has been no change since the beginning of the current war in Gaza. Noncompliance with orders, lack of oversight and failure to learn from mistakes are still common. The investigations are not credible and there is a culture of lying, low standards and lack of professionalism. There is no operational discipline and the senior command does not take responsibility. A conspiracy of silence and a fear of expressing a different opinion, out of fear of being harmed personally, prevail. The scandalous behavior is deeply ingrained in the DNA of the Israel Defense Forces and, as Maj. Gen. Haliva said, “It requires dismantling and reassembly.”

When we take a bird’s-eye view, two years after the start of the war, the following things emerge:

• A complete loss of trust by the combat soldiers and junior commanders in the senior command of the IDF. This is reflected, among other things, in very high percentages of reservists who are unwilling to serve and double-digit percentages of conscripts “fleeing” from the war due to serious mental health issues, burnout and a lack of trust in their commanding officers.

The land army is shattering in every way:

• Loss of professionalism due to lack of training and exercises.

• A desperate shortage of professionals to maintain armored vehicles and weapons as a result of the elimination of thousands of noncommissioned officer and professional officer positions before the war and the transfer of maintenance to civilian companies that are incapable of carrying out the task.

• A severe shortage of conscripts in the standing army as a result of thousands of casualties in the war and a failure to recruit others to replace them.

• A desperate shortage of reservists, who are voting with their feet and simply not responding to call-up orders.

• The land army has been cut to the bone over in the past 20 years, to about one-third of its size, and it is incapable of achieving a decisive victory in even a single sector.

• There is no long-term vision of the kind needed to prepare the military for the next multifront war.

• The military is not submitting to civilian weapons manufacturers its operational requirements for the future. As a result, within a few years the IDF will not have operational capabilities against new weapons that the enemy is obtaining and manufacturing.

• Privatizing logistics by outsourcing to civilian companies cannot meet the needs of a multifront war in supplying food, water, fuel, ammunition, spare parts and more to combat forces. Most professional drivers in Israel are not Jewish, and they might simply not report for work when the time comes. Additionally, as civilians they cannot cross borders into enemy territory, which would soon paralyze the army.

• The privatization of maintenance, so that there is no maintenance of any weapons or equipment, including tanks and armored personnel carriers, once they cross the border into an enemy state during combat. (Civilians are prohibited from entering enemy territory; the Gaza Strip is not an example.) Therefore any malfunction of or damage to this equipment in enemy territory renders it inoperable and useless.

• A severe personnel crisis in the reserves, conscript service and the career service, one of the worst in the history of the IDF. The best service members in the career army are leaving in droves, and young people are unwilling to sign up for it due to their severe disappointment with what has happened in recent years. It’s a tragedy that the IDF is losing all of its quality personnel at a dizzying pace; the implications are disastrous.

• The army is falling apart; building the military on a strong air force, intelligence and elite units is insufficient even in the current war, and certainly not in future wars. Only by dismantling the current structure and rebuilding the IDF with a different command can save the military and national security.

The writer commanded the IDF’s 36th Division, the Southern Corps (441) and the military colleges, and served for 10 years as the IDF’s ombudsman.

This article is reproduced in its entirety

 

 

JFJFP

UK declines to share stance on Britons fighting for Israeli army

An Israeli soldier walks next to an army helicopter after it landed at Reim military base in southern Israel on 12 May 2025

Imran Mulla reports in Middle Est Eye on 19 August 2025:

British MPs have warned that the government must not allow British nationals to fight in the Israeli military after it emerged that Israel is mulling the recruitment of Jewish youths from abroad to fight in its army due to severe manpower shortages.

Middle East Eye asked the Home Office and the Foreign Office what the government’s stance on UK nationals enlisting in the Israeli military is.  The Home Office declined to comment and referred MEE to the Foreign Office. The Foreign Office declined to comment and referred MEE to the Home Office.

Scottish National Party MP Chris Law told MEE: “The UK government must warn against enlistment and ensure that anyone who ignores these warning and does enlist is subsequently held accountable to international law.”

Army Radio reported this week that the Israeli government was looking at a possible campaign to reach out to the diaspora to fill vacancies within the ranks of the military.  The broadcaster said the military was currently struggling with a shortfall of 10,000 to 12,000 troops, driven largely by the refusal of ultra-Orthodox Jews to serve.

Attempts to recruit the conservative minority, who have traditionally enjoyed exemption in return for pursuing religious study, have so far failed to yield results.

More ….

JFJFP

Jonathon Porritt, ex-adviser to King Charles: UK complicit in Gaza genocide

Jonathon Porritt

Anealla Safdar writes in Al Jazeera on 21 August 2025:

London, United Kingdom – Jonathon Porritt, a 75-year-old Oxford-educated environmentalist, is among the hundreds of people that the UK has cracked down on over their support of Palestine Action.

He was arrested and charged earlier this month, under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, for holding up a sign at a rally decrying the government’s decision to outlaw the protest group.

“I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action,” read the cardboard placard that he, and many of the 520 others arrested, raised.  His bail hearing is scheduled for late October.

But Porritt is not a hardened criminal.

He spent 30 years advising the king on environmental issues when the monarch held the Prince of Wales title. He has also chaired a sustainable development commission set up by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, and throughout his career has worked in politics, academia and directed Friends of the Earth. In 2000, he was awarded a CBE, a high-ranking order, for services to environmental protection.

Al Jazeera spoke to Porritt about his activism, Palestine, the role of business and the effect of weapons manufacturing on climate change.

Al Jazeera: As the crisis in Gaza worsens, you have urged the UK to take action to stop Israel’s onslaught. With more than 700 other business leaders, you recently called for targeted sanctions against those accused of violating international law, including war crimes. Does that include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, since he is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court?

Jonathan Porritt: It would certainly include members of his cabinet who have been very forthright in the comments that they’ve made, which clearly breach any understanding of the rights of people to exist … and indicate a readiness to ethnically cleanse Gaza and indeed to prepare to do the same in the West Bank.  It’s very clear that those sanctions do now need to be brought forward, and I think it is important that it’s business leaders that are suggesting that you just can’t allow those kinds of blatant attacks on the Palestinian people to continue.

Al Jazeera: On an individual level, many people appalled at Israel’s conduct in Gaza have joined a campaign to boycott Israeli goods, in an attempt at hitting the economy that fuels the war. Is this an effective way to stem the violence?

Porritt: It is something I do on an individual level. And this is purely personal, but I would be deeply unhappy buying anything exported into the UK from Israel. I feel that the government of Israel at the moment and its track record in terms of the way it’s dealt with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is so repugnant to me personally that I feel uncomfortable supporting the economic standing of that country, so that’s my own personal choice.

I don’t go out of my way to suggest that everybody needs to do that.  I think lifestyle decisions are really important, ethical decisions are really important, but do they actually change very much? Probably not, is the reality, and an awful lot of people simply don’t know the issues behind these choices.

More ….

JFJFP

UK close to giving Israel’s Elbit £2bn contract to train British soldiers

A display of rockets from Elbit Systems UK at the DSEI arms fair at ExCel, 10 September 2019

Imran Mulla reports in Middle East Eye on 21 August 2025:

The UK is reportedly poised to sign a £2bn ($2.69bn) contract with Israel’s largest arms manufacturer that would see it train 60,000 British soldiers a year.

Elbit Systems provides around 85 percent of Israel’s drones and land-based military equipment, and has played a major role in supplying Israel with weaponry for its genocide in Gaza.

Private Eye reported this week that the company’s British arm, Elbit Systems UK, is close to winning a major contract that would make it a “strategic partner” of Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD).

Elbit is reportedly bidding against Raytheon for the Army Collective Training Service contract, after the MoD reduced the bidders to two in February.

If Elbit wins the contract it will work with the MoD to transform military training “through digitalisation, simulation, a different relationship with industry, and by changing how and where the military trains”.

This comes after it emerged earlier this month that Elbit signed a $1.63bn arms deal with Serbia to supply it with long-range precision rockets, alongside a range of other military technologies.

Last month a report by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur for Palestine, said that “for Israeli companies such as Elbit Systems… the ongoing genocide has been a profitable venture”.

Since 2023, Elbit’s UK arm has run the MoD’s Project Vulcan, a £57m contract of simulation-based training for tank crews. The new deal, if it goes through, would be a significant step up in the relationship.

JFJFP

Dozens of Palestinian children from Gaza to be brought to UK for treatment

A child collects water in this picture from Gaza in early August 2025

Imran Mulla reports in Middle East Eye on 18 August 2025:

A group of between 30 and 50 Palestinian children will be evacuated from Gaza to Britain for medical treatment in the coming weeks, according to the BBC.

Children from Gaza have been brought privately to the UK for medical treatment, but this marks the first time that the British government itself will evacuate children for treatment.

Last week 96 MPs from several parties wrote to the government urging it to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to Britain, warning that many were at risk of imminent death.

Earlier this month the government said plans to bring children to the UK for treatment were being carried out “at pace”.  The children will be allowed to travel with family members, and some are expected to enter the asylum system afterwards, since they may be unable to return to Gaza.

More than 50,000 children have been killed or injured since October 2023, according to the UN.

More ….

JFJFP

‘Moral imperative’: Hundreds of UK business leaders demand action on Israel

Palestinians, including children, wait in line to receive food in Gaza City on 20 July 2025

Anealla Safdar reports in Al Jazeera on 21 Aug 2025:

Hundreds of business leaders in the United Kingdom – including a former adviser to the king and a sustainability consultant descended from Holocaust victims – are calling on the government to take action against Israel as the crisis in Gaza worsens.

As of Thursday morning, 762 people had signed a statement calling on the UK to cease all arms trade with Israel, sanction those accused of violating international law – ostensibly including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court, invest in screening to stop the UK financing “complicit” companies, and enforce the United Nations’s principles on business and human rights across the UK’s economic systems.

“We see this not only as a moral imperative, but as a matter of professional responsibility – consistent with our duty to act in the best interests of long-term societal and economic resilience,” the letter reads. “The UK must ensure that no business – whether through products, services, or supply chains – is contributing to these atrocities, directly or indirectly.”

Among the signatories are the former royal adviser Jonathon Porritt CBE; sustainability consultant Adam Garfunkel; Frieda Gormley, the founder of the luxury interior design brand House of Hackney; the prominent philanthropist who once led Unilever, Paul Polman; and Geetie Singh-Watson MBE, an organic food entrepreneur – as well as other professionals who have been honoured with the Member of the British Empire (MBE) award.

They have pledged to support the UK government with an “ongoing process of reflection and action – reviewing our operations, supply chains, financial flows, and influence to help foster peace, uphold human rights, and strengthen respect for international law”.

“Business cannot succeed in societies that are falling apart,” said Polman. “It is time for business leaders to show courage, speak out, and use our influence to uphold international law.”

More ….

JFJFP

Over 80 Orthodox Rabbis urge Israel to address Gaza humanitarian situation, condemn settler violence

A Palestinian young woman rushes away from the site of Israeli air strikes in the northern Gaza Strip on 19 August 2025

Linda Dayan reports in Haaretz on 20 August 2025:

Over 80 Orthodox rabbis – including chief rabbis past and present of several countries – signed a petition released on Tuesday urging Israel to address the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza and condemn settler violence in the West Bank.

Calling the crisis in Gaza “one of the most severe in recent history,” the rabbis state that Israel is not absolved “from assuming its share of the responsibility for the profound suffering of Gaza’s civilian population.” They also affirm that Hamas’ October 7 attack was “a brutal act that justifiably demanded a strong military response,” and called for the release of the hostages.

Despite Hamas’ disregard for the Palestinians in their care, read the petition, Israel’s 22-month military campaign and blocking entry of food and other necessities has brought about destruction, a climbing death toll and “has raised the specter of coming starvation.”

“There have been months when Israel blocked humanitarian convoys on the mistaken premise that increased suffering would bring about Hamas’s surrender. Instead, the result has been the deepening of despair. The justified anger toward Hamas has dangerously expanded by some extremists into blanket suspicion of the entire population of Gaza – children included – tarnished as future terrorists.”

In the West Bank, it states, “extremist settler violence has resulted in the murder of civilians and has forced Palestinian villagers from their homes, further destabilizing the region.”

“Amid this devastation, the absence of a clear post-war vision from Prime Minister Netanyahu has allowed the most extreme voices in the Israeli government – including ministers from the religious Zionist community – to fill the vacuum with disturbing proposals,” it continues. “These include the forced ‘voluntary’ exile of Palestinians from Gaza and the sacrifice of remaining Israeli hostages in the pursuit of an elusive ‘total victory.'”

As some of Israel’s most ardent supporters, Orthodox Jews bear “a unique moral responsibility,” say the signatories. “We must affirm that Judaism’s vision of justice and compassion extends to all human beings. Our tradition teaches that every person is created b’tzelem Elokim – in the Divine image,” the letter reads.  “We are the spiritual descendants of Avraham, chosen to walk in the path of Hashem, ‘to do righteousness and justice,'” quoting from Genesis. “Allowing an entire people to starve stands in stark contrast to this teaching.”

Rabbi Yosef Blau led the initiative. Blau served as president of the Religious Zionists of America for 12 years, and spent 48 years as a spiritual advisor at Yeshiva University in New York.

Among the signatories are the chief rabbis of Denmark, Norway, Poland and the former chief rabbi of Ireland. The list also includes rabbanits – women who serve as spiritual leaders in their communities – as well as a handful of rabbas – female rabbis who have been ordained despite objection from the Orthodox mainstream.

The catalyst for the letter, Blau told Haaretz, was Israel’s decision to block aid to Gaza for two and a half months earlier this year, in the hope that it would force Hamas’ hand.  “Hamas didn’t care,” Blau said. But in preventing the entry of humanitarian aid for that stretch, Israel inadvertently proved how important that humanitarian aid is – and the crisis of starvation that blocking it could cause.

“Morally and pragmatically, it was a disaster. It did not lead to the release of any hostages. It didn’t win the war. It didn’t shorten the war, and it caused enormous damage to Israel’s image in the world,” said Blau. He wrote the original draft of the petition as a blog post for the Times of Israel, and signatories made amendments as the letter circulated among them.

A diverse range of Orthodox rabbis signed the letter, which both hurt and helped the effort. “I have no compunction of signing with people with whom I disagree on other issues; there are other rabbis who are much more concerned about that,” Blau said. “My feeling is, if that was not a part of the discussion, many more rabbis would have signed.”

But another element, one alluded to in the letter, might have kept others away. “The Orthodox community has always been one of the strongest supporters of Israel, certainly in the United States” and in the English-speaking world, he said.

“Therefore, it’s a community that has been very reluctant to ever criticize policies of the Israeli government, lest it be used by our enemies. That’s the major reason, I think, that there are many more rabbis who agree [with the letter], but just couldn’t bring themselves to sign a statement which has within it criticism of the policy of the Israeli government.”

He said that it’s safe to say that the signatories are supporters of Israel. “It’s not anti-Zionist. These are people who care very much about Israel.” He noted that he and his wife made Aliyah earlier this year. “We are concerned that Israel not simply be another country that happens to have a Jewish majority uniquely, but that it represents as much as possible, the fundamental values that you have in Judaism.”

He added, “We’re committed to the notion that Israel has an obligation to maintain a basic moral standard in what it does, and it means taking responsibility, even in the situation which was clearly created by Hamas.”

Blau said that, despite the fact that Hamas committed the October 7 attacks and exploits the suffering of the population under their control, “that doesn’t change the fact that there is a great deal of hunger in Gaza that the nature of the attacks, [aim for] the destruction of the housing, of the hospitals, of the whole infrastructure of Gaza,” he said, adding that Israel must ensure that Gazans can receive nutritious food and have access to proper medical care.

He added that in the West Bank, “We’re certainly aware again that there’s Palestinian terrorism. But we don’t feel that justifies the Jewish terrorism that’s going on in the West Bank. We want to make a statement as Orthodox rabbis, because unfortunately in Israel, very few Religious Zionist rabbis – and there are real exceptions, I didn’t say there are none – are willing to criticize that which comes from within the community, and we felt important that that part be mentioned as well.”

This article is reproduced in its entirety

 

JFJFP

The antidote to the Government’s gaslighting is a stubborn insistence on the truth

Protesters hold cutout pictures of hostages and a banner, as they block a road during a demonstration demanding the immediate end of the war and the release of all hostages, Tel Aviv, 19 August 2025

Noa Limone writes in Haaretz on 20 August 2025:

In the past 24 hours, the gaslighting headquarters, aka the Israeli government, issued its usual dispatches with greater intensity and increased cruelty. The main point: Referring to participants in the day of strikes for a hostage release as a negligible “handful” of people, cynically exploiting the pain of the hostage families for the sake of a political, anti-government campaign, which strengthens Hamas and buries the hostages.

“They’re burning highways and damaging infrastructure,” cried Transportation Minister Miri Regev, who has done more damage to highways and infrastructure than anyone else. The prime minister went as far as to say that the disruptive activities “guarantee that the horrors of October 7 will return,” and Finance Committee Chairman Hanoch Milwidsky dubbed the protests “riots in support of Hamas.”

Israel’s citizens are in an abusive relationship with their government. It’s as though the coalition members read the guide to poisonous behavior, studied it well and are devoutly implementing it.

Gaslighting is the use of lies and reversing the reality in order to weaken people’s hold on it and their ability to distinguish between truth and fiction. The government is thereby inciting citizens against one another and sowing divisiveness in order to rule more effectively.

The antidote to gaslighting is a stubborn insistence on the truth. What exactly is the “order” that the “anarchistic” strike threatens to disrupt? The sequence of days between the sirens and the missile attacks? Between one “cleared for publication” headline and the next? Or the many hours during which the disaster of abandoning the hostages, the photos and the testimony, are repressed? Is the “order” a denial of our crimes in the Gaza Strip? Erasing the faces of the dead children there?

For 682 days our lives have been a hollow routine, the appearance of normalcy: We get up in the morning and go to work, send the children to school and summer camp, sit in restaurants and go on vacation, but many are incapable of answering the simple question “How are you doing?” Because an honest answer would reveal that we’re already beyond despair. Language collapses in the face of catastrophe.

We’re granting the situation validity by the fact that the appearance of routine continues. The order that’s being maintained enables its exacerbation and deterioration. Symbolic activities are no longer sufficient. Neither hostage pins, which even government ministers wear, nor “yellow” films about the cars, nor the rallies at the city squares and intersections on weekends. Even the partial strike and the disruptive activities, if limited to a single day, won’t help, because they won’t rescue them from the symbolic plane, which can be contained.

What will everyone talk about today?

In a sense, the symbolism serves the opposite purpose. It enables a momentary release, provides temporary relief to our heavy consciences. The symbolism swallows up the goal and enables us to continue with the imaginary routine.

The order of the day requires more than that. It demands continual disorder. Disorder is the real order. Because the truth is that reality itself is distorted, chaotic. It was repression that brought about the horrors of October 7 and the horrors that followed, and we must oppose it.

For that purpose, there’s a need for courage and a need for determination and perseverance; withstanding our employers, our concerns about making a living, our natural attraction to what’s familiar, easy and convenient. As fate would have it, we’ve been thrown into this moment in history. This is the moment when we cannot be obedient or blind.

This article is reproduced in its entirety

 

JFJFP

Jewish intellectuals must use their privilege to fight the Gaza horrors in any way possible

A demonstrator at a rally by retired and reserve Israeli Air Force pilots outside army headquarters in Tel Aviv on 12 August 2025

Yael Berda and Abigail Jacobson write in Haaretz on 18 August 2025:

A recent article by Eva Illouz, titled “We Cannot Choose Between the Fight Against Antisemitism and Condemning Israel for Gaza,” sought to define the role of a Jewish intellectual in these times. We wish to stress that the position of the intellectual – now and always – is a privileged one, and it must be translated into action and deed. In our view, the question is not about identity or conflicting loyalties, but about moral action and direct responsibility for the reality we live in.

The role of the intellectual today is twofold: first, to stop the horrors taking place in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem by any means possible; and second, to map out a political horizon that can ensure a future of life in this territory for both peoples. This is not an abstract or “overly idealistic” task, but the most urgent practical and moral duty.

This cannot be done while evading responsibility for government actions and their outcomes. Framing destruction, killing and displacement as mere negligence erases the fact that they are the result of ongoing, intentional policy: pushing Palestinians out of the political sphere, stripping them of their rights, and entrenching a segregationist regime.

Acknowledging this reality does not undermine the right of Jews to self-determination. On the contrary, it is a precondition for constructing a reality that guarantees liberty and security for both peoples.

Antisemitism is rising worldwide and must be taken very seriously. But the struggle against it must not blur the distinction between hatred of Jews and resistance to occupation and oppression. Definitions such as that of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which fail to distinguish between the two, damage the fight against hate and foster dangerous alliances between the Israeli government and antisemitic, far-right forces across the globe.

Alternatives like the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, on the other hand, show that it is possible to combat hatred while upholding Palestinian rights and protecting those who oppose destructive policies.

Recognition of Jewish self-determination does not contradict a colonial reading of local history, including the processes of Zionist settlement and the Palestinian Nakba with its ongoing ramifications. Such a reading is necessary for understanding the imbalance in power relations and dismantling false symmetry. Ignoring it is a moral choice that enables ongoing oppression and prevents the emergence of any horizon for a just solution.

Recognizing the suffering of the other does not negate the recognition of the horrors of October 7, or the suffering and abandonment (by the government) of the hostages. But portraying Hamas as solely responsible for the catastrophe in Gaza absolves the Israeli government of accountability for policies of mass killing, urban destruction, starvation and the deepening of segregation. Supporting the war – even out of existential fear – means, in practice, supporting de facto annexation, ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and displacement in East Jerusalem, as well as the messianic ideas of racist politicians. The judicial coup, aimed at crushing democratic checks and balances, was designed precisely to pave the way for this plan.

We must reject comparisons that conflate different regimes and power dynamics in order to legitimize the present reality. Essential distinctions between struggles for liberation and other horrors worldwide must not be blurred merely to argue that Israel should not face sanctions or boycotts. The question of boycott, like any political tool, must be judged on its morality and purpose, not through simplistic analogies.

The fight against antisemitism and the fight against occupation, racism and Jewish supremacy are part of the same struggle. To abandon one is to abandon both. The role of intellectuals at this moment is to insist on a moral language that distinguishes between a people and a regime, between identity and military control, and refuses to conceal structures of repression behind the rhetoric of security.

This commitment is not a slogan but a daily practice: to halt extermination, dismantle the segregationist regime, and build a political horizon in which all can live and breathe in the Israeli-Palestinian space. Taking responsibility and helping to build an opposition must include outlining a path out of the abyss.

One example is the movement A Land for All: Two States, One Homeland (Prof. Berda is an activist and on the group’s board), which offers a concrete political framework for true partnership between Israelis and Palestinians, based on mutual recognition, shared resources and historical justice. This is an illustration of both moral and practical responsibility for the present and the future – and one possible path to a reality of security, liberty and coexistence.

Prof. Berda is a legal scholar and faculty member in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at the Hebrew University. Prof. Jacobson is a historian and a faculty member in the Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

This article is reproduced in its entirety

 

JFJFP

‘Jews, rebel!’: Ex-Knesset Speaker calls on world Jews to take Israel to ICJ over Gaza War crimes

Palestinians carry the body of a Gazan killed seeking aid, at Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City on 10 August 2025

Etan Nechin reports in Haaretz on 10 August 2025:

Avraham “Avrum” Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli Knesset, called on Friday for one million Jews worldwide to join a collective legal complaint at the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of crimes against humanity in Gaza.

“We need one million Jews, less than ten percent of the global Jewish population, to file a joint appeal to the International Court of Justice in The Hague,” Burg wrote in a post titled “Jews – Rebel. Now!” published on his Substack. “A collective legal complaint against the State of Israel for crimes against humanity committed in our name and under the false banner of our Jewish identity.”

The former top center-left politician urged individuals, communities and Jewish organizations to sign on to what he described as a historic moral and legal initiative. “We will not allow the State of Israel, which systematically inflicts violence upon a civilian population, to speak in our name. We will not allow Judaism to be a cover for crimes.”

Burg, 70, served as Knesset speaker from 1999 to 2003 and previously headed the Jewish Agency and World Zionist Organization. Once a senior figure in the Labor Party, he has become one of Israel’s most prominent dissidents, frequently warning that the country’s political leadership is eroding democratic norms and Jewish ethics.

“This is not a rejection of our people; it is a defense of its soul,” he wrote. “Not destruction, but repair … Now, a great moral exaltation is required of all who refuse to accept the dictatorship of power and corruption led by Caesar Netanyahu and his coalition of apocalyptic zealots.”

Israel is already facing a case brought by South Africa to the ICJ in December 2023, accusing it of genocide in its military campaign in Gaza. In January 2024, the court ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent acts of genocide, allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, and curb public incitement to genocide.

While the court stopped short of ordering a cease-fire, it found South Africa’s allegations plausible and imposed binding interim measures. The proceedings remain underway, with Israel’s response due in January 2026 after a six-month extension granted earlier this year.

Burg’s call comes amid a widening rift in Jewish opinion over Israel’s war in Gaza and its occupation, reflected in a series of recent letters from prominent diaspora Jewish communities and public figures urging a break with the government’s current course. Pro-Israel Jewish groups have also voiced concerns, with J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami noting last week that he “wouldn’t argue” with anyone who called Israel’s action in Gaza a genocide.

Burg framed his appeal as an effort to separate Jewish identity from the actions of the state, saying the initiative was to “raise the Jewish voice of moral resistance.”

This article is reproduced in its entirety

© Copyright JFJFP 2025

JFJFP