Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Call of retired German ambassadors to the German government

germany-flagIn December 2009 a group of retired German ambassadors created quite a stir when they launched an appeal to the German Government, calling on the Foreign Minister Dr. Guido Westerwelle and his staff to reconsider German Middle East policy. Here is an English translation of the appeal.

For further information contact Reiner Bernstein.


Former German Ambassadors call for a more assertive policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Five Statements:

1) The conflict affects major European and hence German interests. These interests cannot be reconciled with the present stagnation of efforts toward peace in the Middle East.

As a breeding ground for extremism, the conflict presents a grave threat to public safety, not only in the region itself, but also in Europe and in other parts of the world. The radicalization in Israel and in the Palestinian territories weakens moderating forces in the region, which are of utmost importance for long-term peace efforts in the Middle East.

The conflict is a focal point which repeatedly incites resentment and hatred toward the West. The perception of European and American Middle East policy is predominantly negative in the Arab world and can only be improved if a fair compromise between legitimate Israeli and Palestinian interests is accomplished.

As a historical legacy, Germany has committed itself to protect the security of Israel. A stable and lasting security, however, can only be achieved through political means, not through occupation and colonization or by relying on military superiority. Instead, it should be achieved by a withdrawal from occupied Palestinian territories and the subsequent establishment of a viable Palestinian state. Israel cannot hope to attain permanent peace while retaining its hold on Palestinian territories.

Finally, strengthening international law and justice as well as fortifying the United Nations rank among the chief objectives of German foreign policy. The observance of the Geneva Convention is particularly important in the Middle East conflict. The violations of the Convention on both sides, as well as a disregard for the UN, must be counteracted.

2) Within the framework of European Middle East policy and in close consultation with the US, it will be necessary for Europe to contemplate measures that will provide sufficient pressure on the conflicting parties to end hostilities.

German and European statements regarding the Middle East conflict have largely been ignored by both sides. A major reason for this disregard is the refusal by Europeans and Americans to take a tougher stance against Israel and the Palestinian Authority that would demand the implementation of a two-state solution. The continuation of certain benefits and financial support allocated to either side, as well as the conditions for a closer alliance with the European Union, could be made dependent on the progress achieved in conflict resolution. Such incentives should also lead to the inevitable inclusion of Hamas into the political process as well as the permanent opening of the check points along the Gaza Strip. While Germany may not be able to initiate these measures, it should also not oppose them. We believe that a Middle East policy without an emphasis on implementation restricts the ability to negotiate solutions that remove obstacles for peace – most importantly, the settlement policy.

3) A detailed draft for a comprehensive peace agreement already exists.

In 2003, the so-called «Geneva Initiative» was negotiated by notable Israelis and Palestinians. The draft proposes realistic compromises regarding the major contentious issues: the founding of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders (this would take into account a mutually agreed land exchange which integrates large settlement blocks near the border into Israeli territory in exchange for concessions of other land for Palestine); Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states with divided territorial sovereignty; a solution for the refugee question that takes into account Israeli security needs as well as the mandatory compensation for refugees; Palestine as a demilitarized state; stationing of a multinational peacekeeping force on Palestinian territory to monitor the withdrawal of Israeli occupying forces; establishment of an international monitoring and verification agency to oversee the  implementation of the agreement.

In addition to an offer by all 22 member states of the Arab League to normalize relations with Israel on the condition of a withdrawal from the occupied territories  (the «Arab Peace Initiative» of 2002), the Geneva Initiative provides a point of departure for negotiations on a secure future for Israelis and Palestinians based on a balance of legitimate interests. The EU should integrate both initiatives into its future Middle East policy.

4) A tougher stance in favor of the two-state solution will not ignore the fact that a withdrawal from the occupied territories constitutes a heavy political and social challenge for Israel.

The main concerns are fear of domestic conflict and national security risks. Given Israel’s nuclear military power, security guarantees from the USA, European solidarity with Israel, and the willingness of the Arab states to conclude a peace treaty, it is hard to conceive of the founding of a Palestinian state as a threat to Israel’s existence. On the contrary: the continuation of the conflict jeopardizes any stabilization in the region and carries unforeseeable risks.

5) A German Middle East policy that is oriented toward the urgent demands of the future, while not forgetting the German-Jewish past, will find understanding and support not only among its own public, but also within parts of the Israeli public.

The conflict between Israelis and Palestinians affects many Germans on an emotional level. With this initiative we wish to contribute to the public debate, especially given the fact that the newly elected German government will again face the challenge of adding its voice to the efforts of the European Union for a renewed attempt to bring this sixty year old conflict to an end.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.