Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Despite UN+ deal, siege on Gaza tightens


Collecting an allowance of precious water in Gaza. Photo by Nasser Nawa’ja, B’Tselem

Worsening the Situation in Gaza: the Failure of the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism

In a recent report examining the Israeli blockade on Gaza, the NGO Oxfam revealed how internationally-brokered measures have negatively impacted development in the Strip through import restrictions on “dual use” items: materials Israel says could be used in the construction of military infrastructure and weapons.

In the aftermath of the assault on Gaza in 2014 –Operation Protective Edge – a temporary measure was introduced in order to facilitate the rebuilding of Gaza: the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism (GRM). This measure was brokered in co-operation with the Palestinian National Authority, Israel, and the United Nations (UN) and was formulated to regulate entry into Gaza of construction supplies that Israel classifies as “dual use”.

However, the report found that the GRM has actually delayed, and has been detrimental to, the reconstruction of Gaza. Critics have argued that the GRM itself serves to legitimize the blockade on Gaza by formalizing the process of limiting the import of vital materials into the Strip, thus validating Israeli control over the area. The report details the humanitarian crisis resulting from the GRM as well as its impact on sanitation and development infrastructures. According to Oxfam:

“the mechanism allows Israeli authorities the power to significantly delay or not approve projects at all, as well as to reject specific items essential for the delivery of infrastructure, despite stringent monitoring undertaken and funded by then international community.”

Oxfam have found that the existing water crisis in Gaza has only worsened since the GRM was formulated:

“Attacks in 2014 caused further significant damage to Gaza’s water and sanitation systems. Gaza’s only power plant was bombed, leaving water and wastewater pumps and treatment plants with extreme shortages of electricity.”

Over 3 000 various items, have been classified by Israeli authorities as “dual-use” and have thus been prohibited from entering, such as metal pipes, asphalt and raw materials for manufacturing, consequently delaying key hygiene and sanitation projects and detrimentally effecting various infrastructural sectors, most notably water sanitation.

Moreover, for the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism, the 2014 Israeli assault constitutes the starting point of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, disregarding the infrastructural issues in sanitation and development, and the general health of the population, that have existed long before 2014.

Rather than condemning the blockade and Israel’s impact on the humanitarian crisis, the United Nations’ decision to work together with the Israeli government to implement it through the GRM has only worked to cover up what is a structural problem in Gaza.

Whilst the UN has publically opposed the blockade in Gaza, through brokered negotiations such as the GRM, the UN has in fact been complicit with Israel through overseeing and restricting basic supplies needed to rebuild. As the report states:

“The root cause of the failures of the GRM are the restrictions inherent in the blockade itself: the fact that the ‘dual use’ list is imposed and fully controlled by Israel. However, the GRM formalizes these restrictions, at best mitigating some of the violations of an inherently unlawful blockade but fundamentally failing to challenge it.”

Furthermore, the UN has reported that by 2020 the Gaza Strip will be unliveable as a result of the water crisis and various humanitarian and infrastructural emergencies. However, the UN were also a key facilitator in the brokering of the GRM, which has resulted in the de-development and worsening situation in the Gaza Strip.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.