Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



The no-cost occupation

On October 7, 2015, undercover Israeli security personnel (the 3 in jeans) and soldiers detain a wounded Palestinian protester during clashes near the Jewish settlement of Bet El, near Ramallah. Photo by Mohamad Torokman / Reuters

NGO: Israel evades compensating wounded Palestinians amounting to ‘cost-free occupation’

By Chloe Benoist, Ma’an news
March 08, 2017

BETHLEHEM — Israel has purposefully introduced legislation over the past twenty years to avoid paying compensation to Palestinians who have been injured by Israeli forces, Israeli NGO B’Tselem said in a report made public on Wednesday, revealing that the amendments had led to a 95 percent decline in filed claims in the span of a decade.

While both international and Israeli civil law hold the state responsible for damages or injuries caused by its security forces as a result of “negligence,” B’Tselem stated that Israel had begun a legislative process in the mid-1990s to both expand legal exemptions and to discourage Palestinians from filing claims.

B’Tselem Research Director Yael Stein emphasized in a press conference on Tuesday that Israel has notably broadened its definition of what circumstances fall under “warfare activity” — a category in which the state is deemed not liable for any damages caused — to engineer a “cost-free occupation.”

“Today, the definition is so wide that almost any activity by Israeli security forces in the (occupied Palestinian) territories is under this definition,” Stein explained, listing “simple policing work” such as checkpoints, detention raids, and protest suppression as now being defined as “warfare activity.”

Stein added that a number of legal and bureaucratic hurdles were also intended to discourage Palestinians from filing claims — including a far shorter statute of limitations, heavy court fees, and the need for Palestinians from the occupied territory to apply for hard-to-obtain travel permits to be able to attend court hearings in Israel.

As a result, the report revealed, the number of Palestinian claims for compensation fell from an average of 300 a year between 2002 and 2006 to a mere 18 between 2012 and 2016 — a 94 percent decrease.

The amount of money paid by the state of Israel in compensation to Palestinians has also drastically decreased, with Israeli payments going from 21.6 million shekels ($5.8 million) on average each year between 1997 and 2001, to only 3.8 million shekels ($1.03 million) yearly between 2012 and 2016.

The drop was particularly pronounced for Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip, where B’Tselem said compensations received were 97 percent less than 15 years earlier.

“Israel’s policy on paying compensation to Palestinians who suffered harm reflects its profound contempt for the life, safety, and property of Palestinians in the occupied territories,” the report read.

“The denial of access to justice means… that all Palestinians know all the time that it almost doesn’t matter what is going to happen, they will have no recourse to justice,” B’Tselem Executive Director Hagai El-Ad said on Tuesday.

B’Tselem highlighted the dishonesty of Israel arguing that the Palestinian Authority (PA) should bear the costs of damage incurred by its civilians, as is customary in other armed conflicts between two nations, due the extremely limited powers granted to the PA under the Oslo Accords.

“Israel cannot reassign responsibility for the injuries it causes and act as though the Palestinian Authority were a sovereign state,” the report stated. “Israel is well aware of the reality of occupation which it created and continues to maintain… However, to justify evading payment of compensation, the state is willing to change its tune and declare the Palestinian Authority has state-like status — all the while changing nothing in its actual treatment of the Palestinian Authority or its residents.”

Meanwhile, the double standard of Israel invoking payments that are distributed by the Palestinian government to wounded Palestinians and the families of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces to justify forgoing compensations is made all the more blatant given Israel and the United States’ vocal opposition to such payment programmes.

“One of (Israel’s) main claims is that ‘we pay for ours and they pay for theirs,’ which of course is not a valid claim, you cannot talk here about two equal sides,” Stein told Ma’an. “But actually, Israel is withholding all the money that the PA is giving to the injured. So they use it in order to justify this legislation, then say that the PA is giving all this money to terrorists… Israel is playing both ways here.”

B’Tselem also took issue with Israel’s argument that the issue of compensation to Palestinians should be discussed as part of a final resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“Israel is doing all in its power to prevent the end of the occupation and to establish facts on the ground that will prevent reaching any agreement with the Palestinians,” the report read. “Proposing that the tens of thousands of people injured during this half-century wait for the occupation (of the West Bank and East Jerusalem) to end and for ‘negotiations’ to be concluded is tantamount to assuring that they will never receive any compensation.”

B’Tselem concluded that Israel “does not offer Palestinians harmed by its security forces a genuine opportunity to file for damages in Israeli courts, offering them no more than the illusion of being able to do so.”

“Paying compensation to persons who have suffered injury to themselves or their property is not an act of charity — it is the state’s obligation under international law,” the report stressed.

“The significance of human rights is not limited to merely having them entrenched in some law or international covenant. If no sanctions are enforced when human rights are breached, the rights become moot and the perpetrators have no incentive to institute a change in policy.”


Getting off Scot-free: Israel’s Refusal to Compensate Palestinians for Damages Caused by Its Security Forces, pdf file

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.