Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Role of IDF: make its presence felt by Palestinians


“Creating a sense of persecution” in Hebron: seven soldiers detain 5-year-old Wadi’a Maswadeh with his hand-cuffed and blindfolded father. Wadi’a had thrown a stone at a settler’s car-tyre. Photo from ISM

Netanyahu wants to repress my group, Breaking the Silence. May, don’t help him

Israel’s friends in the UK should fight to protect funding for an organisation that bears witness to the moral price paid for the maltreatment of Palestinians

By Yehuda Shaul, The Guardian
February 08, 2017

On Monday the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, met with his British counterpart, Theresa May. Among other things, he asked her to stop the UK government’s funding of the group I co-founded, Breaking the Silence, as well as other human rights organisations in Israel and Palestine. This is regardless of the fact that Breaking the Silence has not received funding from the British government since 2011.

As an Israeli, it’s not my place to tell Netanyahu to stop interfering in decisions made by the British government. That’s something British citizens can do. What I can do is shed some light on the reason Netanyahu is so intent on stopping us, an organisation of soldiers who encourage public debate on the reality of occupation and the moral price it exacts from Israelis.

As Netanyahu made his way back to Israel, the Knesset passed the regulation bill, a land expropriation law that seeks to retroactively legalise the theft of Palestinian land by Israel for the benefit of settlement development.

There’s nothing new about stealing Palestinian land for the purpose of settlement expansion. This is what Israel has been doing for nearly 50 years. It’s the only way we could have installed 700,000 Israeli settlers across the green line. Sometimes this land grab is achieved by declaring Palestinian land “state land” (Israeli property), and sometimes by sealing an area off for security purposes.

What’s new about the passing of this bill is that legislation concerning what goes on in Palestine – which until now was subject to the Israeli Defence Forces (the sovereign entity in Palestine) – was decided for the first time by the Israeli parliament, a body that Palestinians cannot vote for, and which therefore does not represent them.

In so doing, the Israeli parliament took my country one step closer towards being an apartheid state. But more than anything else, the regulation law clearly indicates that the Israeli government is neither interested in ending the occupation nor in achieving a two-state solution.

For the soldiers involved with Breaking the Silence, who served in Palestine and enforced the policy of occupation, this is not new. This reality became clear to me during my first days serving in the heart of Hebron. I was one of 650 combatants guarding 850 settlers in a city of 200,000 Palestinians.

One of our main missions was to “make our presence felt”. The idea was that if Palestinians experienced IDF presence in any place, at any time of day, they would be deterred from carrying out attacks. We operated three patrols in Hebron for this purpose. Day and night, we would go into the Casbah, the Old City of Hebron. Entirely at random, rather than on the basis of any intelligence, the officer or sergeant would pick a house. We woke up a family at two in the morning, fully armed, and searched the house – for no reason.

We then started knocking on the doors of houses and shops to make noise, in the middle of the night. We ran to the other side of the Old City, entered another house – and this continued for eight hours, until the end of our shift.

This has been the protocol: 24 hours a day, seven days a week, since the start of the second intifada in September 2000. The sole purpose was to intimidate the Palestinian population through what we called “creating a sense of persecution”. Because this is what you have to do, when you want to maintain control over millions of people with no rights, and with no endgame in sight. The only way to do it is to induce constant fear, and as soon as this fear becomes routine, ramp it up more, to no end.

This is the kind of behaviour that was carried out in the interest of bolstering occupation, not of ending it. These are not the policies implemented by people who desire to live peacefully alongside millions of Palestinians in the West Bank, but rather by those seeking to control them forever.

This is the policy Netanyahu seeks to uphold, and why it’s so important to him to stop us or anyone else who tries to resist it. As Israelis, we must ask ourselves what kind of Israel we want, a democratic state or an apartheid state. We at Breaking the Silence choose democracy and human rights – and that’s why we’re working tirelessly to oppose the occupation.

Friends of Israel in the UK should ask themselves what it means to be pro-Israel: is it helping Netanyahu maintain the occupation, turning us into an apartheid state? Or is it helping to restore democracy through ending the occupation, thus actualising a two-state solution?

Cabinet office minister Matt Hancock is on his way to Israel to assure its government that he will sacrifice the UK’s local democracy to Israel’s interests in, he says, ‘the interests of national security’. Obviously he knows what words open doors in Israel.

February 16th, 2016

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.