Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011




Barkan wineries – stilll under pressure


For our “domaine” Series, with its emphasis on wines that are enjoyable while young, we have chosen fruit from Tabor in the Lower Galilee. For our “Classic” Series, we have chosen fruit from the Upper Galilee and Golan. These same vineyards are the source of our “Reserve” and “Superieur” Wines.

From: Adam Keller
Sent: Thu, 3 December, 2009 22:23:18
Subject: Gush Shalom to ‘Barkan Wineries’: boycott continues until you also dissociate from your Golan Heights vineyards

Press Release,  December 2, 2009

Gush Shalom to ‘Barkan Wineries’: Not enough that you took your plant out of the Barkan  West Bank settlement; boycott continues until you also dissociate from your Golan Heights vineyards

Gush Shalom (the Israeli Peace Bloc) rejected the demand of  Barkan Wineries to remove the company’s name from Gush Shalom’s list of settlement  products.

The Gush Shalom spokesperson told the company’s  representative  that as long as  Barkan Wineries continue to maintain vineyards on the Golan Heights, which is an occupied territory, Gush Shalom will continue to regard it as a settlement company,  despite its having completely removed its plant from the industrial zone of the Barkan settlement from which the vineries originally derived their name.

The name Barkan Wineries appeared  on the lists of settlement products which Gush Shalom has been compiling and distributing since 1995, with a call upon consumers in the country and abroad to boycott these products and avoid purchasing them.

The struggle waged by Gush Shalom was joined by activists of the Coalition of Women for Peace, who created a website called “Who Profits from the Occupation?”.   Among other things, they deployed researchers to monitor the activities  of Barkan Wineries in the Occupied Territories as well as investigate the company’s financial reports and the statements it submitted to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

The struggle was also joined by European organizations, such as the Dutch “United Civilians for Peace” , which threatened the Heineken Beer Company with a consumer boycott in the  Netherlands due to its links with Barkan Wineries .

After years of struggles and pressure of this kind,  Barkan Wineries closed down its plant in the Barkan settlement industrial zone and transferred it to Kibbutz Hulda inside the Green Line (pre-’67 border). Thereupon the company’s legal adviser, Att. Sa’ar Faraj, , this week sent a letter to Gush Shalom spokesperson Adam Keller, stating:

“I was astonished to discover that the name of the Barkan Company is included in the list of settlement products appearing on the Gush Shalom website. I would like to make clear that Barkan is not producing anything at any settlement, nor does it  purchase raw materials from any settlement. Therefore, please take care of  immediately removing the company’s name from your list.”

Adam Keller responded to Att. Faraj:

Greetings and thanks for your letter. I and my fellow members of Gush Shalom are  happy to learn, from the text of the letter you wrote, that the directors of  Barkan Wineries  – your client – now understand what they did not understand in the past: If a company becomes known for conducting business activity at a settlement in Occupied Territory, its good name and business interests,  in the country and abroad, might get severely damaged. Naturally, the Barkan Winery company is interested in preventing such damage, by getting its name removed from the Gush Shalom list of settlement products.

Unfortunately, your statement – ” Barkan is not producing anything at any settlement, nor does it  purchase raw materials from any settlement ” –  is not factually accurate.

Indeed, after many years when its main plant was  located in the industrial zone of Barkan on the West Bank,  your client moved it to Kibbutz Hulda within the internationally recognized sovereign territory of the State of Israel. The Gush Shalom movement warmly welcomed that step by the Barkan Wineries, and in fact for a time we seriously considered removing the company’s name from our  settlement products list. However, our researchers found out that, while having completely left the West Bank,  Barkan Wineries still maintain vineyards in no less than three settlements on the Golan Heights, which – as is well known – is also a territory captured in 1967.

Indeed, the website of your client specifies that the Barkan Wineries hold:

A 30 dunams’ plot of land at the Avnei Ethan settlement, planted with red cabernet sauvignon grapes;
A 150 dunams’ plot of land at the Eliad settlement, planted with red cabernet sauvignon, merlot and shiraz grapes;
A 40 dunams’ plot of land at the Sha’al settlement, planted with red cabernet sauvignon grapes and white sauvignon blanc ones.

Moreover, the company’s website specifically and indeed proudly noted that grapes from the vineyards which the company maintains on the Golan Heights add to its wines “their unique taste”.

To avoid any misunderstanding, I would like to draw  your attention to the explanatory note appended to the list of settlement products on the Gush Shalom websites, which explains the rules and criteria determining which companies and products would be included in this list and which would be removed.

“Definition: what is a settlement, and who is a settler? There is a simple, clear and objective test: any community of Israeli civilians living on land captured by the IDF in the war between 5 June to 10 June 1967 is a settlement, whether it is on Palestinian territory or on Syrian one. All who live is such a community are  settlers. (…) Whether or not the territory in question was annexed by the State of Israel is immaterial. No country has ever recognized such annexations. As far as International Law, these were and remain Occupied Territories, and the unilateral annexation by the State of Israel is null and void. Any Israeli who goes to live there is violating International Law”.

So far, the explanatory note on our website. It is clear, therefore, that according to these criteria your client, the Barkan Winery company, definitely counts as one which is still producing in settlements, and purchases raw materials derived from settlements. Therefore, unfortunately, we are bound to continue to include the company’s products in the list of settlement products which we are publishing for the attention of the public in the country and abroad.

It goes without saying that if we get an authoritative and binding announcement that “Barkan Wineries Ltd” has completely removed itself from the settlement vineyards at Avnei Ethan, Eliad and Sha’al, the Gush Shalom movement will be most happy to immediately remove the name of the company from our lists and let this step be known to our activists, sympathizers and partners in the country and abroad.

Sincerely yours
Adam Keller – Gush Shalom spokesperson

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.