Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Justice Goldstone & former Israeli ambassador Dore Gold in debate

(L to R) Dan Terris, Richard Goldstone, Dore Gold and Ilan Troen during the forum's Q&A segmentBrandeis University, 6 November 2009

Packed house hears Justice Richard Goldstone and former Israeli ambassador Dore Gold make their case

Video of this event, in its entirety, will be posted on brandeis.edu and BrandeisNOW on Monday, Nov. 9

Justice Richard Goldstone and former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Dore Gold engaged in a pointed, searching discussion of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in Gaza on Nov. 5 before a rapt audience of Brandeis University students, faculty, members of the general public, and international media, including The Boston Globe, the Jerusalem Post, Al Jazeera, Israel National News, New England Cable News, YNet, Public Radio International’s “The World,” and Reuters.

It was the first time that Goldstone, whose name has become synonymous with the U.N. Human Rights Council’s fact-finding report on the conflict, engaged in a public forum with a senior Israeli political figure over widespread criticism of the report among supporters of Israel.

The report states that there is evidence that Israeli and Palestinian militaries committed war crime and possibly crimes during fighting in and around Gaza that peaked over a three week period last December and January. It recommended that both sides undertake credible investigations of their actions. Neither side has done so yet.
Goldstone is a distinguished international jurist who formerly served as prosecutor of war crimes in Bosnia and Rwanda, and was involved in the post-apartheid reconciliation process in his native South Africa.

The overflow crowd at Brandeis and thousands who viewed the event on a live online heard the two men agree that the United Nations is broadly biased against Israel and disagree over whether the Jewish state should have participated in the UN probe of the 23-day clash last December and January that devastated much of the Palestinian territory.

They also disagreed sharply over core topics of the fact-finding mission – particularly whether Israel deliberately targeted non-combatants in Gaza as a way of punishing the population there for its support of the Islamic extremist group Hamas, which launched thousands of rockets from Gaza into southern Israel in recent years. Launches were escalating rapidly at the time Israeli forces entered the territory and engaged Palestinian fighters last December.

Gold asserted that the long history of animus toward Israel was ample reason for the Jewish state to refuse to cooperate with the U.N. fact- finding mission, whose report is currently the subject of a major debate in the U.N. General Assembly.

Goldstone, who headed the fact-finding mission and who also is chairman of the advisory board of Brandeis’ International Center for Ethics, Justice and Public Life, agreed that there was a long history of U.N. hostility toward Israel, but said the mandate he was given to investigate the Gaza fighting was the most even-handed U.N. approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ever, and should have been seized upon by Israel as an opportunity to have its views and evidence heard by the world.

Gold, and many students who participated in the question and answer session that followed the two men’s presentations, faulted Goldstone and his colleagues for directing harsh and specific criticism toward Israel but using vague and mild terms to describe Palestinian offenses. Gold called the report “the most serious and vicious assault on the State of Israel since” U.N. General Assembly passage in 1975 of a resolution declaring Zionism a racist, imperialist ideology that threatened world peace.

The resolution was formally repealed in 1991, but its sentiments were strongly endorsed by many U.N. members who participated in the UN conference on racism held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001.

Goldstone said he and other members of the U.N. fact-finding group “would have liked to meet with the victims” of attacks on Israel launched by the Islamist organization Hamas, but was prevented by the Israeli government from doing so. “I pleaded with the Israeli government” to cooperate with the U.N. mission, Goldstone said, but the fact-finding committee was not allowed to visit southern Israel – the area principally affected by Hamas rocket attacks.

“Let me be absolutely clear,” Goldstone said. “International law allows, and indeed requires, Israel to defend its citizens. Hamas and others committed serious war crimes against the citizens of southern Israel…. ” However, he said, there is evidence that Israel’s policy in the latest fighting was to direct its military might against civilians and civilian infrastructure as a way of deterring future rocket attacks, a policy he said “completely undermines the foundations of international law.”

“It is a matter of regret that we were not informed of the views of the Government of Israel and the IDF,” the Israel Defense Forces, Goldstone said.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.