Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Test your antisemitism; no facts needed

1) What questions did the ADL’s surveyors ask? Ofer Aderet, Haaretz; 2) WSJ presents the findings in which on only one criterion – Jews have too much power in international finance – does a majority think this is ‘probably true’. 3) Amira Hass on the divorce between experience and beliefs in the survey.

The night market in Vientiane, capital of Laos. Which is not in Europe or the Middle East, has no established Jewish presence and had the lowest prejudice-rating in the ADL survey. Perhaps most significantly Laos, like most of the Far (from the UK) East, was relatively untouched by the vicious inter-war antisemitism of Europe, and to a lesser if significant extent, North America.

Test yourself: Are you anti-Semitic?

A survey by the ADL indicates that about a quarter of the world is anti-Semitic. The poll was completed by asking a series of interesting, almost leading questions.

By Ofer Aderet, Haaretz
May 14, 2014

The Anti-Defamation League published a broad survey of worldwide anti-Semitism Tuesday that it conducted among 50,000 people from 100 countries. The results show that one-quarter of the world is anti-Semitic. Fifty percent of Muslims, a quarter of Christians and even a fair number of Buddhists were found to be anti-Semitic on the basis of the survey. The worst situation was found to be in the Palestinian Authority, where most of the population was defined as anti-Semitic.

How did the ADL define who is anti-Semitic? It was very simple. Anyone who agreed with at least six of the supposedly anti-Semitic statements listed below was defined as anti-Semitic. Yet we have read recently that the number of anti-Semitic incidents has decreased. Confused? There is a good reason for that.

Judge for yourselves whether this study is fair, scientific and serious. The full results of the study were published on a dedicated, interactive website. The website is impressive, with abundant statistics, graphics, animations and a clean, accessible design. There you can learn important facts, such as that 62 percent of Polish people believe that Jews talk too much about the Holocaust, and much more.

If you would like to know how much of a Jew-hater you are, here is the list of statements compiled by the ADL that will show whether you are anti-Semitic. How many statements do you agree with. Six are enough to put you in the category of an anti-Semite.

* Jews are more loyal to Israel than to [this country/the countries they live in].

* Jews have too much power in international financial markets.

* Jews have too much control over global affairs.

* Jews think they are better than other people.

* Jews have too much control over the global media.

* Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars.

* Jews have too much power in the business world.

* Jews don’t care what happens to anyone but their own kind.

* People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.

* Jews have too much control over the United States government.

* Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.

The findings of the poll conducted by First International Resources, which carried out 53,100 interviews in 96 languages, can be seen in this pie-chart from the Wall Street Journal (a publication which would be, in the ADL’s media release, the epicentre of popular prejudice about Jewish control of media and finance) to be more nuanced and less definite than in the ADL’s release of the findings, which have been widely reproduced as factual evidence of global antisemitism.

IDF arrive to arrest a boy who throws stones.  The mother shelters the younger son.

The ADL’s strange view of anti-Semitism around the world – and in Hebron

Why didn’t the pollsters ask: How many people do you know whose land was stolen by Jews – people whom the Jews removed from their homes?

By Amira Hass, Haaretz
May 19, 2014

The Anti-Defamation League and the company that conducts surveys for it consider it appropriate to ask a Polish person, a Chinese person and a Palestinian person the same 11 questions to measure anti-Semitism around the world.

The pollers provided 11 statements reflecting anti-Jewish stereotypes. Anyone who said that six or more of the statements were true was defined as anti-Semitic. News reports on the survey pretty much shouted with glee that the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip were the most anti-Semitic of all.

Last Tuesday afternoon, Israeli websites published their stories about this enormous survey (there were 53,000 respondents, which tells us something about the ADL’s financial resources).

At about 10:30 P.M. that night, army troops broke into the home of the Saddam Abu Sneineh family in Hebron’s Old City, which is dominated by a couple of thousand Jews – settlers and soldiers.

Only on Wednesday morning did I see a text message I had received about the break-in. As soon as I saw it, I was overwhelmed with feelings of guilt. Two weeks earlier, when the incident involving Nahal soldier David Adamov went viral, army troops arrested – under false pretense – Abu Sneineh, one of two Hebron residents whom Adamov had threatened with a cocked rifle.

At first, Abu Sneineh, 20, didn’t want to talk about the 24 hours he spent in detention and the abuse he suffered. He feared that it would only provoke the soldiers, Adamov’s friends, to attack him again. Several young Palestinians and I tried to persuade him that the publication of articles about the ordeal was a form of protection.

The Israel Defense Forces Spokesman’s Office chose not to comment on my questions about Abu Sneineh’s false arrest and the soldiers’ abuse of him. And now, four days after my article on him was published (on May 9), soldiers appeared at his home.

I was told they had come to arrest him again. The soldiers beat him, members of his family tried to prevent his arrest, the soldiers beat them also, and they arrested Jibril, Saddam’s 30-year-old brother.

I asked the IDF Spokesman’s Office immediately on Wednesday morning to comment on the information I had received and the conclusion (also mine) that the arrest was an act of retaliation by Adamov’s fellow soldiers. A few hours later I got the news that Jibril Abu Sneineh had been taken to the police for questioning, released and admitted to a Palestinian hospital. A response to me from the IDF Spokesman’s Office arrived only Thursday morning:

“During a routine operation by army troops, who were searching for weapons in Hebron, a conflict broke out between area residents and soldiers when a Palestinian man tried to attack the troops using cold weapons,” the IDF said, referring to weapons other than guns. “The troops arrested the attacker, who was transferred to the Israel Police and released.”

How does a home turn into an “area”? Why was there no denial of the family’s statement that the soldiers had come to arrest Saddam again and beat him again? How was it that the police immediately released a Palestinian man who had tried to attack a soldier? The answer is known only to the commanders and military legal advisers who needed 24 hours to come up with a response.

Comparing Iceland to Gaza

But we’re talking about the ADL’s survey on anti-Semitism. In one of its tables, the names of countries in which the number of Jews is fairly large (at least 10,000) received an asterisk. Respondents from those countries were asked a few more questions. There was an asterisk for Poland. There wasn’t one for China, and there wasn’t one for the West Bank or the Gaza Strip.

In other words, the ADL had freed the West Bank from the distressing, arrogant and aggressive presence of roughly 550,000 Jewish settlers. The ADL also believes that the same rules that apply to Iceland and Laos apply to the Gaza Strip: In all three, familiarity with the concept “Jew” is abstract because few Jews live there.

Army invasions (by Jews) almost every day, thousands of people killed by Jews, almost 40 years of settlements, 40 years of Jewish bosses (bad ones and good ones), tens of thousands of Gazans’ searing memories of Jews who expelled them from their villages and homes – none of that is relevant to the people who conducted the ADL’s survey.

They asked people in Reykjavik, Vientiane and the Jabalya refugee camp the same questions. They didn’t ask any of them: How many times have you been beaten by a Jew? How many people do you know whose land was stolen by Jews – people whom the Jews removed from their homes?

Which reminds me. When my father was a child in Romania, he learned that it was better to keep the shutters closed on Sundays, when the local townspeople were leaving church. His CV also includes expulsion from home with thousands of others and three years in a ghetto. In other words, he was no stranger to anti-Semitism.

Fortunately, he died in 1997, without seeing how far the Jewish-Israeli occupation had gone. But as early as 1991, when I came back from Gaza with reports on how the occupation was squeezing money out of the Palestinians, he said with a sigh of bitterness and pain, in his typically Yiddish-type way of exaggerating: “Israel is retroactively justifying what anti-Semites have been saying about us for 2,000 years.”

One of the 11 statements in the survey – which was asked in Ukraine, Lebanon and Hebron – was: “People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.” This best indicates the survey’s essentialist approach. According to it, there is no link between the opinions and the social and historical context of the place in question. The interaction between a Jew and non-Jew in Riga is identical to that in Jenin.

If the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which have been under continued Jewish occupation, were not included in the survey, its findings might have been a basis for discussion. Including the occupied Palestinian territories in the survey turns it into a cheap and dangerous propaganda tool.

Need to ‘prove’ global antisemitism meets contempt, first citical responses to survey and ADL’s PR.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.