Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Fiscal rule in Israel – the money goes to the strong

The massive social protest movement in June 2011 – but unlike the article below they did not make the connection between low spending on civilian goods – which they were protesting about, especially housing – and high spending on settlements and ‘defence’.

Where’s the money? In defense and the settlements

New fiscal rules are a ruse to take from the weak and give to the strong.

By Avi Temkin, Globes
March 11, 2014

This week, the Knesset and the media have been full of the coalition’s move in putting through three bills, the governance bill, the bill for drafting haredim, and the referendum bill, as a package deal. Little attention was paid to the fact that, a few days ago, the Knesset Finance Committee quietly and quickly approved a Ministry of Finance proposal to limit the growth in public spending, as part of a change in the rules for constructing the state budget.

Under the change that was approved, government spending will grow by just 2.6% in 2015 (in comparison with 2014), instead of by 3.8%, which would be the case under existing rules. This means cutting spending by billions of shekels. The official explanation is that this is intended to prevent the debt:GDP ratio, currently 70%, from rising, and to avoid a tax hike. The full explanation is that the government intends to reduce the debt:GDP ratio to 50% within a few years.

On the face of it, the Ministry of Finance’s proposal is based on professional and businesslike considerations. In fact, this is a move entirely motivated by ideology, and by quite a few superstitious beliefs. In the end, what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Finance Yair Lapid seek is to reduce civilian spending in Israel even further, particularly on public services. Netanyahu’s notion of “the fat public sector” is still alive and well, and his belief in privatization and in policy that benefits those on high incomes is apparently as fervent as ever.

Nevertheless, two professional bodies, the Bank of Israel and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have both stated that a debt:GDP ratio of 60% is right and appropriate; and Governor of the Bank of Israel Karnit Flug has expressed opposition to a drastic cut in civilian spending, and recommended going in the direction of higher taxes. Israel has the lowest rate of civilian spending among the OECD countries, and its direct taxation, in the form of income tax and companies tax, is also low by international comparison.

Yair Lapid (second from the left) and Naftali Bennett (to his left) at the illegal West Bank outpost Kida in 2010. Both are now  government ministers. Photo by Roy Sharon

The latest IMF report on the Israeli economy finds that, in most years in which there has been a fall in the debt to GDP ratio, the improvement derived from high growth, and not from budget cuts. In essence, putting the country into a situation of “fiscal strangulation” (massive public spending cuts and real harm to citizens) will lead to a slowdown in growth, especially at a time when other demand, from private consumption and exports, is also stuttering. The result will be an unplanned rise in the debt:GDP ratio, and demands from the Ministry of Finance Budgets Division for further “painful measures”.

The dispute over the appropriate debt:GDP ratio is only part of a broader issue latent in the government’s proposal. In practice, every shekel “liberated” from financing health and education services will be divided between the defense budget and the settlements budget, and the saving will be small. How is it possible to be so certain of that? Because that is exactly what has happened in the past several years, and because that is the real spending rule in Netanyahu’s governments.

State’s witness

On that matter, it’s worth mentioning an article published yesterday in haredi newspaper “Yated Ne’eman”, the content of which was later confirmed by MK Moshe Gafni (United Torah Judaism) in an interview with Galei Tzahal (IDF Army Radio). According to the article, in the past few years there has been very large investment, deliberately kept from public view, in settlements and illegal outposts. Gafni is a sort of state’s witness in this respect, one who can testify about the deeds of his former political friends, following the break-up of the alliance between them. Gafni, who served in the past as chairman of the Knesset Finance Committee, even described how he acted in the interests of the settlers. He could equally have told of the short committee sessions at which billions of shekels were approved for the defense budget, with no public control and no real discussion.

Foreign Relations and Security Committee member, Yoni Chetboun, slammed the repeated warnings that Israel is facing a complete severing from the world economy should it fail to comply with the Palestinian, European and American demands for withdrawal from Judea and Samaria. According to MK Chetboun, “We are under an assault of cognitive terrorism intended to pressure Israel.” The equation is simple,” he continued. “The more stressed and weak we look, the stronger the boycott campaign will become. These terrorist threats won’t hold water unless we provide them with a vessel.” Photo by FLASH90

If anyone believes that things will be run differently in future, and that the proposal in question will indeed bring about a significant reduction in the deficit, they are entitled to live in their naivety. The real fiscal rule, as set in the Netanyahu government, is that the money goes to the strong. The rest have to make do with the prime minister’s speeches in English and the minister of finance’s postings on Facebook.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.