MKs who can’t bear to hear the truth
This posting has these 4 items:
1) DW: Martin Schulz under fire after Israeli-Palestinian comments in the Knesset, calm report from Deutsche Welle;
2) Tikun Olam: Israeli MKs Storm from Knesset During EU Parliamentary President’s Speech, Richard Silverstein points to the isolation of Israel when even friends speak out about the injustice;
3) Guardian: Israeli rightwingers walk out during president of EU parliament’s Israeli speechIan Black picks out the siege of Gaza as the most important criticism;
4) EU Press office: Speech to the Knesset by Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament. largely a declaration of undying support for Israel;
President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz addresses the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem on February 12, 2014. Photo by Flash 90
Martin Schulz under fire after Israeli-Palestinian comments in the Knesset
February 12, 2014
A speech by European Parliament President Martin Schulz in the Israeli Knesset has sparked an uproar. His remarks about the conditions in the West Bank caused several right-wing politicians to walk out in protest.
European Parliament President Martin Schulz came under fire Wednesday after making remarks in the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, about the water usage of Palestinians and Israelis in the occupied West Bank.
In his speech, Schulz said that when he was in Ramallah earlier in the week, a young Palestinian had asked him “why an Israeli can use 70 cubic liters of water daily and a Palestinian only 17?” He then added, “I haven’t checked the data. I’m asking you if this is correct.”
The remarks caused the Knesset to break out in turmoil. Right-wing Jewish Home Party member Moti Yogev shouted at him, “Shame on you, you support someone who incites against Jews.” Yogev and Naftali Bennett, Economy Minister and Jewish Home party leader, then left the hall.
Bennett immediately took to his Facebook page: “I will not tolerate duplicitous propaganda against Israel in the Knesset … and especially not in German.”
Likud Party member Moshe Feiglin, known for his extreme statements, was absent for the speech because, “it is inappropriate that a speech is given in the parliament of the Jewish state, in the language used when our parents were thrust into the railway wagons and in the crematoria,” he wrote on Facebook.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his own address to the Knesset, accused Schulz of repeating claims without fact-checking. “Check first,” he said.
Israeli media quoted Israel’s national water authority as saying the figures quoted by Schulz were inaccurate with West Bank settlers consuming 1.7 times more water per person, instead of 4.2 times more.
In his speech, Schulz also said “the Palestinians have the right to self-determination and equality,” and that they want to “live in peace and have unlimited freedom of movement,” which he said they are denied in Gaza.
Shortly before his Knesset speech, Schulz had complained of sensitivity in Israel against criticism from Europe. “Mutual criticism is quite normal in a democracy,” he told Israeli journalists. “The EU stands by its special relationship with Israel, but that does not mean that it has to agree with every decision of the Israeli government,” stressed Schulz.
By Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam
February 12, 2014
I’ve been reading with some bemusement the reaction by Israel’s far-right MKs to the address given by EU parliamentary speaker, Martin Schulz. In a speech that was largely supportive of Israeli interests and which opposed the BDS movement, the EU leader did make mention of his conversations with Palestinians who told him about their destitution.
Among the issues they raised was the immense disparity in water use between Israelis and Palestinians. In his speech, he said they told him Israelis use an average of 70 liters of water while Palestinians use an average of 17. The howls of outrage were immediate. The entire Bayit Yehudi faction walked out during the speech. They’d have nothing to do with a German Nazi perpetrating more anti-Semitic outrages on the Jewish people in their own people’s legislature:
MK Moti Yogev (Habayit Hayehudi) called to Schulz: “Shame on you, you support someone who is inciting against Jews.” Shortly after, the Habayit Hayehudi MKs stormed out of the room.
Party chairman Naftali Bennett responded heatedly to Schulz’s remarks, saying: “The comments made in the Knesset are very serious. Habayit Hayehudi demands an apology from the president of the European Parliament, who said two lies in his speech, which Palestinians fed him. Silence in the face of lying propaganda grants legitimacy to activities against Israeli citizens.”
Indeed: calumny, protocols of the Nazi elders, dirty lies. Except for one problem…it’s all true.
B’Tselem, Israel’s foremost human rights NGO devotes an entire page of its website to comparative water consumption rates between the two peoples:
The discrimination in utilization of the resources shared by Israel and the Palestinian Authority is clearly reflected in the figures on water consumption by each population. Daily per capita water consumption in the West Bank for domestic, urban, and industrial use is some 73 liters. In areas in the northern West Bank, consumption is much lower. In 2008, per capita daily consumption was 44 liters in the Jenin area and 37 liters in the Tubas area.
There is a huge disparity between Israeli and Palestinian consumption. Per capita water consumption in Israeli towns is 242 liters and in local councils, 211 liters. In other words, per capita use in Israel is three and a half times higher than in the West Bank.
The World Health Organization and the United States Agency for International Development recommend 100 liters of water per capita per day as the minimum quantity for basic consumption.
The discrepancy between the figures quoted by Schulz and B’Tselem may be related to the latter’s figures including all uses (including industrial). It’s possible the Schulz figure only includes residential water usage (in the home). At any rate, the ratios agree in both cases. Both find Israelis use three and a half times more water than Palestinians. In other words: no lies, no anti-Semitism. Just truth. And the truth hurts.
Part of my bemusement at the Israeli reaction to the speech was that I pictured the MKs storming out of the Knesset hall with their fingers plugged firmly in their ears and loudly humming HaTikvah so they wouldn’t have to listen to this anti-Israel drivel from the Nazi Schulz.
Even in the unruly Knesset, it’s considered a violation of protocol to walk out of an address by a foreign leader. I chalk it up to the increasing dysfunction of current Israeli political life. As the world turns increasingly against Israeli Occupation and other injustices, there is nowhere left to turn for succor or support. Even friends are hated and shunned. The fact that as mainstream a European politician as Schulz dared even to address this issue in the Knesset means that Israel’s friends are rousing out of their torpor. They are being emboldened by BDS to raise criticisms they wouldn’t have dared voiced before this. Israel is entering rough waters internationally.
This brouhaha makes clear how absolutely isolated and ignorant Israeli MKs are from reality. They only know how they and their fellow Israeli Jews live. As for anyone else, that’s their problem.
What’s disturbing about the coverage of this story is that the mainstream media which reported it has done no research to determine which side was correct (as I have with a cursory Google search). Why? Don’t they have Google at Haaretz? Or are they afraid to expose the abject ignorance of Israeli rightist MKs?
Martin Schulz tells Knesset EU will always support Israel but highlights Palestinian suffering and ‘siege’ of Gaza Strip
Ian Black in Jerusalem, theguardian.com,
February 12, 2014
Far-right Israeli MPs stormed out of the Knesset in protest on Wednesday as the German president of the European parliament pledged that the EU would always support Israel but highlighted Palestinian suffering and the “siege” of the Gaza Strip.
Naftali Bennet, the economics minister and leader of the religious-nationalist Bayit Yehudi (Jewish Home) party, led a walkout in response to what he condemned as Martin Schulz’s “lies”.
Schulz’s speech mentioned the importance of remembering the Holocaust. But his comments on the living conditions of Palestinians proved too much for Bennet and his supporters.
Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, weighed in to accuse Schulz of “selective listening” by saying that Israelis consumed 70 litres of water a day compared with 17 litres for Palestinians. “Even the Palestinian water authority says the discrepancy is much smaller,” Netanyahu said. “Schulz admitted that he didn’t check if what he said is true, but he still blamed us. People accept any attack on Israel without checking it. They plug their ears.”
Bennet wrote on his Facebook page: “I call on the prime minister to demand an immediate correction in the name of the state of Israel. I will not accept an untrue sermon on morality directed at Israel in Israel’s parliament. Definitely not in German.”
In 2009 a World Bank study found that in 2007 Israelis had access to 4.42 times more water than did the Palestinians in the West Bank. But Israeli media quoted Israel’s national water authority as saying the figures quoted by Schulz were inaccurate, with West Bank settlers consuming 1.7 times more water per person.
On Tuesday Schulz made clear that the EU had not boycotted and would not boycott Israel over its settlements in the occupied territories. “In the European parliament there is not a majority for a potential boycott,” he said.
Last year the EU decided to block grants and funding for any Israeli entity operating beyond the country’s pre-1967 borders, building on earlier decisions to require the labelling of goods produced in illegal settlements.
Ten days ago the US secretary of state, John Kerry, warned that Israel would face more calls for boycotts if the current peace talks with the Palestinians collapsed – a statement that was seen as a shot in the arm for the international Boycott Disinvestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Schulz said the EU would support the “long road to peace” but added: “Palestinians, like Israelis, want to live in their countries with freedom of movement and no limitations. The Palestinians have the right to self-definition and justice.
“When the goal is the two-state solution, Israel’s security will undoubtedly be on the agenda. I’m sure an army can bring calm, but I don’t think it can bring peace. Ariel Sharon, RIP, said something I agree with – you cannot have a Jewish democratic state and at the same time rule it all.”
Bennet and the other Bayit Yehudi MPs were furious over Schulz’s comment that the blockade of Gaza prevented growth. But new figures from the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics show the unemployment rate in the coastal strip rose 6% to 38.5% in the last quarter of 2013. The increase followed a ban on transferring construction materials to Gaza’s private sector. Unemployment in the West Bank is 18.2%.
“The jump in unemployment in Gaza could be reversed almost immediately if Israel would remove restrictions on civilian movement,” said Sari Bashi, of Gisha, an Israeli group that monitors freedom of movement.
Speech to the Knesset, 12 February 2014 by Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament
European Parliament Press Release
Mr Speaker, Mr Edelstein,
Members, dear colleagues,
I stand before you today as the German President of a multinational European Parliament. I am well aware that it is by no means self-evident that the German language should be heard in this House, and I should like to express to you my gratitude for allowing me to address you in my mother tongue.
It is a great honour for me to be in Jerusalem as a guest of the Knesset, the body which is the heartbeat of Israeli democracy, the body which symbolises the realisation of the hope cherished for so long by the Jewish people for a homeland of their own; following centuries in which the Jewish people were betrayed and persecuted throughout the world; following the unprecedented break with all civilised values which the Shoah represented; and following the barbaric murder of six million Jews.
I was born in 1955. I am a German who did not experience at first hand the atrocities of National Socialism, but the crimes committed by the Nazis were the reason I became involved in politics and their repercussions have influenced political thinking from the start. I bear the same responsibility as every other German for the mass murder perpetrated in the name of my nation. In the name of my nation, the Jewish people were forced to endure suffering for which no reparation can ever be made. I bow down before the memory of all those who were murdered.
As a German who holds political office, and international political office at that, I regard it as my first duty to honour the following pledge: Never again. Never forget.
We must make sure that the act of commemorating past disasters which have befallen humanity engenders a sense of responsibility for the present and the future, and that we let this sense of responsibility guide our actions.
Letting this sense of responsibility guide our actions means standing up for freedom, for democracy and for human dignity every day.
We are all witnessing with dismay a return to ways of thinking which we thought had long been consigned to history, in the form of anti-Semitism, ultra-nationalism and populism. This merely strengthens me in my conviction that we must stand firm together – every one of us – against all those who stir up hatred. I believe that what the philosopher Edmund Burke said still holds true: ‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’.
We have no choice, therefore, but to act responsibly. Acting responsibly means observing the principle enshrined in Germany’s Basic Law that ‘human dignity is sacrosanct’.
Acting responsibly means, for us, nurturing the European unification process, because integration between our States and our peoples was the response we Europeans found to the wars, destruction and murders which disfigured the first half of the 20th century. Unification and integration have helped us to banish the old demons and have immunised Europe against the threat of war.
Acting responsibly means, for us, openly acknowledging Israel’s right to exist and the right of the Jewish people to live in security and peace. The European Union will always stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel.
Dear Members of the Knesset,
For the sake of our children and our children’s children we must remember. For the sake of future generations, who will never have the opportunity to talk with survivors of the Shoah, we need events and places which help us remember.
Yesterday I had a deeply moving experience. Together with Judge Gabriel Bach I visited the Yad Vashem memorial. I had the honour of meeting Judge Bach for the first time two years ago, on International Holocaust Memorial Day, which we celebrated at the European Parliament for the third time only a few weeks ago, together with members of the European Jewish Congress and survivors of the Shoah. I find Judge Bach’s life story very inspiring, and meeting him has restored my faith in justice. The fact that a 10-year-old boy who was driven from his homeland by a Nazi criminal in 1938 should later, as Deputy State Prosecutor of a democratic Israel, put that criminal, Adolf Eichmann, on trial, shows that there is such a thing as justice in this world. And that justice is something worth fighting for every day!
Ladies and gentlemen,
Israel embodies the hope cherished by a people of being able to live a life of freedom in a homeland of their own. As a result of the actions of brave men and women, Israel represents the realisation of that very human dream. Throwing off the shackles of prejudice and persecution, in order to live in freedom and dignity – this is a desire shared by many people throughout the world.
Today, Israel is a robust democracy, a vibrant, open society with all the conflicts that implies, and a modern economy. The kibbutzim which once made the desert bloom have been replaced by hundreds of start-ups and high-tech research centres in which work is being done which will lead to the inventions of the future; minute microchips and robots, computer tomography and ultrasound scanners. Israeli researchers are world leaders in many areas. Israel has only eight million inhabitants, but it can boast seven major research universities, including the Technion in Haifa and the Weizmann Institute in Revlion, and 12 Nobel Prize winners!
Israel has built a society founded on the values of freedom, democracy and the rule of law. Israel and the European Union share these values. They are the ties which hold our partnership, our friendship, together. They are the basis for the answers we are seeking together to the challenges of the 21st century: climate change and water scarcity, refugee problems, peace and security. They are the basis for our scientific and economic cooperation.
If you will allow me, I will deal first with security and peace.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Arab Spring has brought with it revolutions and upheavals in the region which are presenting Israel and the EU with new challenges. Together, we can exert a positive influence on developments in our neighbourhood. This is a responsibility we cannot ignore.
The changes and upheavals I referred to a moment ago are leaving many people uneasy, and with good reason. Syria is experiencing an ever more brutal escalation of violence. The Assad regime would rather massacre its own population than give up power! Even children are being tortured and killed. The opposition is also guilty of perpetrating appalling massacres and recruiting child soldiers. We condemn the savage violence in the strongest possible terms. The killing must stop!
Two days ago in Jordan I visited the Al Zaatari camp, which houses 90 000 of the 2.2 million Syrian refugees. I was deeply shocked by the human suffering I witnessed there, but I was also deeply moved by the generosity which has led the States in this region to open their borders to refugees from the civil war and do whatever they can to provide them with food and a roof over their heads. Israel, too, is saving many lives by giving medical care to people damaged physically and mentally by the Syrian war. Sometimes I wish we in Europe would show the same kind of commitment.
But there are also grounds for hope: Tunisia’s new constitution is a document to gladden the hearts of all democrats. The EU will always support those who commit themselves to upholding democracy and universal human rights.
This sense of hope is creating a new opportunity to establish peace in the region.
I understand that bitter experience may make some people reluctant to extend the hand of peace. People in this chamber know much more about the Holocaust than I do. There are people in this chamber who risked their lives in wars waged to secure Israel’s survival. For years on end, Israel’s neighbours challenged its very right to exist.
No one has forgotten the open threats made against Israel by the last Iranian President, or the fact that not so long ago political gatherings in Tehran ended with the words ‘Death to Israel’.
For that reason I can readily understand why Israel regards an Iran which has the capability to launch nuclear missiles as a threat to its existence. That is a threat not just to Israel, but to world peace in general.
This is why the EU is monitoring the implementation of the preliminary agreement very closely. Let me assure you that there is one thing on which the EU and Israel agree: Iran must never acquire nuclear weapons. In our eyes, diplomacy and dialogue are the best way of ensuring that, since it is in all our interests that this issue should be resolved peacefully and that everything should be done to prevent another war in the Middle East.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Security is a very abstract concept, but it has an immediate impact on people’s lives.
We in Europe have little understanding of the physical and emotional scars which terrorism leaves behind, what it means for parents in Sderot and Ashkelon to live every day with the fear that their children may die in a rocket attack on their way to school. I was the father of children who could go to school without fear. For that reason, Israel has the right and the government the duty to protect its people. We condemn the rocket attacks on innocent people in the strongest possible terms. Terrorist attacks are crimes for which there is no justification.
It is only the peoples directly involved who can make peace in the Middle East. It is only the Israelis and the Palestinians themselves who can make peace between their two peoples. We Europeans support them on that difficult road, which will require both sides to make painful concessions.
We know that the Israeli people want peace. Courageous men such as Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres held out the hand of peace and signed agreements in Madrid and Oslo. The hopes embodied in those agreements have not always been fulfilled, and this has made some people pessimistic about the prospects for peace in the future. Others, only a small minority to be sure, are even actively working to scupper any peace agreement which might be signed.
On the Palestinian side as well, courageous men and women are working for peace. In recent years, building on their impressive ‘no violence’ policy, Mahmud Abbas and Salam Fayyad have developed modern institutions and done much to establish law and order.
Two days ago I spoke with young people in Ramallah. Like young people everywhere in the world, their dream is to train, study and travel, to find work and to start a family. But they have another dream as well, one which concerns something most young people take for granted: they want to be able to live freely in their own country, with no threat of violence, with no restrictions on their freedom of movement. The Palestinian people, like the Israeli people, have the right to fulfil their dream of creating their own viable democratic state. The Palestinians, just like the Israelis, have the right to self-determination and justice.
One of the questions these young people asked me which I found most moving – although I could not check the exact figures – was this: how can it be that an Israeli is allowed to use 70 litres of water per day, but a Palestinian only 17?
Ladies and gentlemen,
Today, the upheavals in the Middle East are creating a new opportunity for peace.
The future of young Palestinians, but also the future of young Israelis, hinges on the way Israel responds to these changes.
For without peace there can be no security. Military power can quell disorder, but it cannot create peace.
Ariel Sharon, may he rest in peace, said something for which I admire him: ‘It is impossible to have a Jewish democratic state, and at the same time to control all of Eretz Israel. If we insist on fulfilling the dream in its entirety, we are liable to lose it all.’
From the outset, the whole rationale behind the two-State solution proposal was to make it possible for the Palestinian people to live in dignity, and on the basis of self-determination, and to safeguard peace and security for all Israelis. Despite all the obstacles in the way of its achievement, we must remain true to the objective, born out of a desire to build a better future, which the two-State solution represents. Even if this objective is achieved, the security of the Israeli state will remain an issue of major importance.
For that reason, we support the US commitment to mediation and the tireless work being done by Secretary of State John Kerry.
One of the main bones of contention is Israel’s settlement policy. As you are no doubt aware, both the European Parliament and the United Nations have adopted numerous resolutions which criticise the ongoing process of building and expanding settlements and call for it to be halted. In the eyes of the EU and the entire international community, the fact that East Jerusalem is cut off from the West Bank is certainly an obstacle on the road to a peaceful settlement.
The blockade of the Gaza Strip is your response to attacks on Israeli civilians and I can understand that. But it is stifling all economic development and driving people to despair – despair which in turn is being exploited by extremists. The blockade may in fact undermine, rather than strengthen, Israel’s security.
How can we break the vicious circle of violence?
This was the question which lent the initial impetus to the European unification process, and the founding fathers of the European Union came up with the answer. My grandparents’ generation would have regarded reconciliation with the arch enemy France as impossible. But the impossible came to pass, through a simple acknowledgement of the fact that if Europe was not to continue tearing itself apart on the battlefield we Europeans had no choice but to make peace and work together. I believe that if we want to grant people a life in dignity there is no alternative to peace for the Israelis and Palestinians today.
It was because our neighbours were prepared to hold out the hand of reconciliation to Germany, which had started the war in the first place, that Germany was able to find its place in the international community once again and become a stable democracy. As Yitzhak Rabin put it so aptly, ‘peace is something you make with your enemies, not with your friends’.
Yes, we achieved reconciliation. Then, through the efforts of courageous men and women, who planned for and organised peace, the idea took root in people’s hearts and trust grew.
I firmly believe that a negotiated settlement, the outcome of which is an Israeli State and a Palestinian State living side by side in peace, is realistic. The European Union believes this as well, which is why, once a definitive peace agreement has been signed, we have pledged to provide unprecedented support, in the form of funding and human resources, under a special privileged partnership. The agreement reached by the Foreign Ministers in December will also afford Israel and a future State of Palestine easier access to the European market, will facilitate trade and investment, will enhance cultural and scientific exchanges and will lead to closer cooperation in the area of security. Let me seize this opportunity to make a clarification: the EU has no intention to boycott Israel. I am of the conviction that what we need is more cooperation, not division.
All too often issues of security and peace overshadow other aspects of our relations which are hugely important for people in Israel and Europe – social justice and equal opportunities are cases in point.
The financial and economic crisis has brought with it increased levels of poverty and unemployment in Europe. Huge numbers of young people are jobless, and as a result more and more of them are losing faith in politics. This is hardly surprising if we consider that the most open-minded and best educated generation which Europe has ever had is watching as its prospects are destroyed by a crisis for which it was in no way to blame.
Everywhere, even in countries whose economies are performing well, poverty and despair are spreading to the middle classes and the weakest members of society are being marginalised more and more. The marches of the indignados which reached our capitals in spring 2011 were repeated a few months later in the heart of Tel Aviv.
Giving young people fresh hope in a better future is certainly our most important task as politicians. To do this, we must also safeguard the competitiveness of our economies in the globalised 21st century. Only in this way will jobs – good jobs – be created.
Our economic ties are already close. The EU is Israel’s most important trading partner and our cooperation in the area of research, science and technology is the basis for our future economic strength. Our competitiveness in a globalised world will hinge on two things – innovation and education.
The Israeli-European research community is already into its third generation and its members are forging ever closer links. Israel’s formal involvement in the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme, which will start soon, will take our cooperation to a new level. Horizon 2020 is the largest research and innovation programme there has ever been. It promises to yield more breakthroughs and discoveries because it will provide backing for every stage in the process of turning ideas tested in the laboratory into marketable products. Scientific cooperation is already the most successful aspect of our partnership. I am convinced that as a result of our cooperation under Horizon 2020 new records will be set. I am also particularly delighted that more and more Israeli students are taking part in the Erasmus Mundus exchange programme.
You and I are the heirs of the founding generation of the State of Israel and of the European Union. We must safeguard that heritage.
Parents all over the world are prepared to make sacrifices for their children, to do everything they can to give them a good future. It is now up to us, the heirs, to show the same boldness, drive and vision in safeguarding the State of Israel and the European Union for future generations. The words which should guide us in that endeavour are those spoken by the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Willy Brandt, a man who fought against Nazi Germany and knelt before the memorial to the Jews murdered in the Holocaust. ‘Peace is not everything, but without peace there is nothing.’
Why water should be on the table, all the facts and graphs you need – cut out and keep;
People of Gaza may have to flee in search of fresh water