Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Financial fiddle to fund settlements

The Jewish settlement of Beitar Illit in the Gush Etzion bloc of settlements in the West Bank. Photo by Dan Balilty/AP

Calcalist: Settlers Take 75% “Haircut” on Government Loans (i.e., don’t pay back)

By Lara Friedman, Americans for Peace Now
November 05, 2013

An article by Shaul Amsterdamski in today’s edition of the Calcalist – an Israeli business daily linked to Yedioth Ahronoth – reports on a remarkable phenomenon: the variety of “loans” made by the Israeli government to settlements and individual Israeli settlers, either with a formal or informal understanding that part, most, or even all of the loan would never be repaid. [For ‘haircut’ see * below]

The original article (in Hebrew) is available here. Included here is a portion of the article, as translated into English by Israel News Today.

Settlers Receive 75% Haircut on Loans They Took from State

Calcalist (p. 10) by Shaul Amsterdamski — The overall sum of money that the Jewish Agency’s Settlement Division, which is the government’s executive branch for construction and development in Judea and Samaria (and formerly in the Gaza Strip as well), gave in loans to settlements and settlers, came to NIS 1.2 billion [£213,013,200, $339,847,200]. That is the cumulative sum that includes loans that the Settlement Division gave between 1978 to 2011.

The Settlement Division offers settlements and settlers three types of loans. The first is a loan for the purpose of purchasing manufacturing equipment, such as machinery, and it is given for a 30-year period, at 3% interest plus the Cost of Living Index. The recipients of these loans begin to pay back the loan after only ten years, and the beneficiaries need only return 25% of the sum of the loan in 20 annual payments, while the remaining 75% turns into a grant at the end of that period, and need not be paid back.

The second type of loan given by the Settlement Division is a loan to build infrastructure. The Settlement Division grants these loans to the settlements themselves, for a 37-year period. The settlements only begin to pay back those loans after seven years, at just 2% interest plus the Cost of Living Index.

The last type of loan is loans that are given to settlers individually, and they are designed to meet construction and housing needs. But, as the small clause cited in Explanation 5(b) on page 47 of the Israeli government’s fiscal report for 2012 notes, a significant number of those loans were given with no intention of ever collecting the debt.

Infrastructure: a modern Israeli-only road, overlooked by a Jewish-only settlement, in the West Bank. Photo by Kirkland.

Or, as the accountant general wrote in the fiscal report, “Up until 2011 loans were given for construction. Those loans were not recorded in previous years, and the manner of registration and management has not been regulated yet. Moreover, terms of repayment have yet to be determined.” Loans that are given without establishing the terms of repayment are exceptional–if not altogether nonexistent–in the free market, which gives rise to the explanation that those loans were given without any intention of ever having them repaid.

But that isn’t all, According to the fiscal report, “The collection over the years of loans that that were given by the Settlement Division were negligible or completely nonexistent.” In other words, the Settlement Division handed out money to settlers in the form of loans–public funds that come out of the state budget–and neither collected those loans nor intended to do so. In practice, according to the report, the entire outstanding sum owed was classified as a debt that was most likely uncollectable.

The Israeli Alon Shvut winery in Gush Etzion**

An examination by the Finance Ministry found that out of the NIS 1.2 billion that the Settlement Division handed out in loans to the settlers and settlements, only NIS 200 million has been collected (16%). As of the end of 2012, there remained NIS 275 million in outstanding debts that still remained to be collected at future dates. Most of that money is earmarked for collection in arrangements for defaulted loans, which means that the entire sum is not expected to find its way to the state’s coffers.

Nearly half of the total sum of loans–NIS 630 million that was given to settlers in the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria–were written off completely by a decision that was made by the previous government, the second Netanyahu government, in February 2012, following up on a previous decision by the Olmert government. […]

Notes and links
* Haircut: 
From Wikipedia

In finance, a haircut is a percentage that is subtracted from the market value of an asset that is being used as collateral. The size of the haircut reflects the perceived risk associated with holding the asset. However, the lender has a lien for the entirety of the asset. The higher the haircut, the safer the loan is for a lender. The haircut and the LTV add up to 100%.

**Forbidden fruit: the Israeli wine industry and the occupation Report from Who Profits, and the full report Forbidden fruit, pdf, especially its chapter ‘Government Support of the settlement grape industry’.

The organisation says all its members are committed to the principles of the market economy and pluralistic democracy.

It says its purpose is to boost prosperity by providing a web of compatible policies and practices across countries that are part of an ever more globalised world.

Israel’s accession
7 September 2010 – In signing the OECD Convention, Israel pledged its full dedication to achieving the Organisation’s fundamental aims.

OECD: Our Mission
The common thread of our work is a shared commitment to market economies backed by democratic institutions and focused on the wellbeing of all citizens. Along the way, we also set out to make life harder for the terrorists, tax dodgers, crooked businessmen and others whose actions undermine a fair and open society.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.