Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Dutch firm pulls out of Israeli contract – it breaches international law

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters perfo[r]ming “The Wall” in Canada, 2010. Photo by AP

Who’s the bigger threat to Israel – Roger Waters or Royal Haskoning?

The former Pink Floyd front man scores high for boycott buzz but the a decision by the Dutch company to quit Israel is more worrying.

By David Rosenberg,  Ha’aretz 
September 18, 2013

You’ve probably heard of Roger Waters, or at least his erstwhile band Pink Floyd. But does Royal HaskoningDHV ring a bell?

Here’s a hint. Both scored a few points for the campaign to impose boycotts, sanctions and divestment on Israel in recent weeks.

Should we be worried? A little, and not because of Waters. We should be worried because of that nearly anonymous Dutch engineering company.

On the Boycott Israel Buzz meter, Waters, the former front man for Pink Floyd and composer of its greatest hits, scores a solid 8.5 out of a possible 10. Royal HaskoningDHV might score a 2, and that’s only because it’s Holland’s largest engineering company.

Waters, who has been a long time proponent of BDS, resurfaced again last month with a letter calling on “my brothers and sisters in the family of Rock and Roll” to declare a cultural boycott of Israel. Accusing Israel of Apartheid and ethnic cleansing, Waters harkened back to the glorious history of the cultural and sports boycott of South Africa that led the downfall of the white regime.

Meanwhile, in early September, Royal HaskoningDHV reluctantly announced that it was pulling out of the Kidron waste water treatment project in East Jerusalem.

Being a bunch of engineers, not poets, the company employed something less than ringing language:

In the course of the project, and after due consultation with various stakeholders, the company came to understand that future involvement in the project could be in violation of international law. This has led to the decision of Royal HaskoningDHV to terminate its involvement in the project.

The writing on The Wall

Waters’ accusations of Apartheid and ethnic cleansing are unfounded and his history of South Africa isn’t borne out by the facts, but that doesn’t mean he won’t be heard by virtue of the fact that he is a cultural icon of sorts. Okay, he may not be an A-list celebrity but he has a little more intellectual heft that, say, Miley Cyrus, by virtue of being associated with the freedom anthems from his rock operetta The Wall. His fans are older and more thoughtful.

Royal HaskoningDHV probably stands on firmer ground by citing international law, but on the other hand abandoning the project is intellectually absurd. The Kidron project aims to clean up raw sewage that flows through Palestinian villages and would have benefitted Palestinians, not settlers. It was being led by a joint venture between Israelis and Palestinians.

But let’s not dwell on the rationales of either Waters or Royal HaskoningDHV because it’s not relevant to whether BDS will ever succeed. History is littered with lots of bad ideas that have nevertheless caught on because they represented too tempting a vision for the facts to get in the way. Using the words “Apartheid,” “ethnic cleansing” and “a violation of international law” makes the BDS idea hard to resist. What, you’re in favour of violating international law?

Waters’ call for a cultural boycott has the potential to administer a painful sting, but it’s far from a fatal one as he suggests in his letter.

Every time Elvis Costello or The Pixies make a public display of not performing in Israel, or for that matter Stephen Hawking’s declining to give a lecture, it hurts. These are people admired by the global public, Israelis included, and they enjoy a certain credibility that ordinary mortals do not. Hawking is a supremely intelligent man and Waters is a talented artist. If they think Israel is so wicked, well, there must be something to it.

Of course, some of the worst ideas to enjoy a big splash – take communism – have won the enthusiastic backing of artists and intellectuals. But that hasn’t hurt their standing as cultural icons and opinion leaders who[se] views on things totally unrelated to their acknowledged skills or talents enjoy respect and influence.

In any case, for now the cultural BDS campaign hasn’t been particularly successful, but if things change, the fact is that Israel can hunker down and download “The Wall” rather than hear it live.

Why the company’s boycott matters more

Royal HaskoningDHV’s decision, however, has far more serious implications than our Boycott Buzz meter’s readings tell us. That is because the company buckled to pressure from the Dutch government.

A consumer boycott of Israel or companies doing business with Israel has virtually no chance of succeeding because it’s almost impossible to refrain from using Israeli-made products. You can’t find them on store shelves or in the malls, except in a few marginal cases like Dead Sea Cosmetics and Max Brenner chocolates – but they’re in electronics sold world-wide, for instance.

Likewise, most of the foreign companies doing serious business with Israel, such as Intel and Coca Cola, are too big, too ubiquitous and too popular to boycott.

Maybe with the help of Roger Waters and Stephen Hawking, Israel’s alleged crimes will eventually create a wave of global consumer resentment, but we’re a long, long way from that. What could speed the BDS drive along is if governments begin to support it.

As the Royal HaskoningDHV case showed, official pressure is far faster, effective and more efficient than grassroots pressure with its petitions and protests can ever be.

We’re also a long way away from governments imposing boycotts on the settlements, much less on Israel. The subject would be laughed out of Washington, and the up-and-coming economies of Asia don’t like to mix politics and business. But in Europe we are moving ever closer.

The European Union’s decision this summer to cease funding institutions and companies operating over the Green Line was a timid step, subject to endless hand-wringing about how to implement it. But it has already created a bigger problem for Israel than Roger Waters could ever hope for, by putting Netanyahu’s government in an awkward position when negotiating the 80-billion-euro Horizon 2020 scientific research program.

Israeli universities and companies stand to benefit enormously from the funds that will available, but the government is beholden to the settlers who don’t want to be cut out, even symbolically. Israel should have a pen out ready to sign on, but instead is now engaged in protracted negotiations.

“Maybe we are at the tipping point now with Israel and Palestine,” Water said in his letter. Indeed, maybe we are, but not because of a few rock and roll performers. It’s because of a few suits in Brussels.

Notes and links

The Kidron Valley, below,  runs north-south between the Mount of Olives and the eastern wall of the Temple Mount   falling  4,000 feet to the Dead Sea. The Gihon Springs once filled this valley, but the settlers of Jerusalem diverted the water into pools and channels for their use. Untreated sewage and rubbish now pollute the valley. Kidron adjoins the valley in East Jerusalem

Company Profile
Royal HaskoningDHV is an independent, international engineering and project management consultancy with over 130 years of experience. Our professionals deliver their services in the fields of asset management, aviation, buildings, energy, industry, infrastructure, maritime, mining, strategy, transport, urban and rural planning, water management and water technology. [Read more]

Corporate Governance
The Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of Koninklijke (Royal) Haskoning DHV Groep B.V. are guided by the principles and best practice provisions of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code. [Read more]

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.