Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

EU stands up to Israel – and the USA


Palestine may be short of water but not of sunshine. Water wells and cisterns and solar panels for generating electricity are among the most common EU-funded projects in the West Bank. The al-Thala installation above was funded by Israel’s greatest European ally, Germany. The IDF announced in February 2012 it was to be demolished (like many other such water and solar installations) because it did didn’t have the right permit. It has been the destruction of European aid projects – American ones are left untouched – as much as anything else which stiffened EU anger with Israel.Photo by Majdi Mohammed/ AP.

EU overtakes the US as a peace broker with significant clout

By Rachel Shabi, The National
July 31, 2013

You only need to observe the reactions to two recent events involving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to gauge which track is deemed to be more of a positive development.

When the US secretary of state John Kerry announced a breakthrough agreement between Israeli and Palestinian leaders to talk about reconvening go-nowhere peace talks, there was a giant, jaded yawn from Middle East watchers. Conversely, when the European Union announced new guidelines earlier this month requiring Israel to ensure no funding goes to the settlements, many sat up and paid attention. So did the Israeli government, describing the EU’s tougher stance, variously, as “an earthquake”, “a brutality” and “a miserable directive” that undermines the peace process.

While analysts were describing a ground-breaking tougher stance from the EU, Israeli officials – right up to the president Shimon Peres – spent a week pleading with the EU not to go through with it. This reaction contrasts starkly with what Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu had to say about Mr Kerry’s breakthrough. Israel’s daily Haaretz newspaper reported about his “boasting” to his ministers:

I pulled the Palestinians down from the tree of preconditions [to resuming talks]; I didn’t agree to a further freeze of building in the territories; I refused to release 120 prisoners before the talks and the 1967 borders aren’t mentioned.

Israel currently has the most right-wing, settler-friendly government in its history and a cabinet that openly derides and ridicules any prospect of a Palestinian state. Meanwhile, their “partners” in talks represent only the Palestinian West Bank, leaving the Gaza strip and its residents offset for this critical discussion (the one that’s only about having a real discussion – keep up). In such a context, it is hard to see this US-driven peace track as anything more than an enforced holding pattern and one doomed to fail – again. For some time now, talking, aka the “peace process”, has been more important than actually reaching a settlement that would end Israel’s decades-long occupation of the Palestinian territories.

That is why the new EU guidelines, which affect funding programmes for joint research, education and other projects with Israel, are so striking; it represents a moral victory as a first, long-awaited chink: the day the EU finally stood up to Israel and backed up long-stated principles with concrete policy.

As Sam Bahour, a Palestinian-American business development consultant living in Ramallah, explained: “It is too little, too late, but I do think that it is ground breaking. That’s because it synchronises with all the talk we’ve been hearing for the past 20 years, including the EU’s own reports, showing the illegality of Israel’s actions on the ground.” Indeed EU officials themselves have stressed that the guidelines only underline what has been a stated EU position on Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank – deemed illegal under international law.

This late alignment of principles with practice is thought to be a sign of the EU losing patience with Israel and its disregard for international law. Just before the guidelines emerged, veteran Israeli journalist Akiva Eldar wrote of the EU’s rising sense of mistrust and disappointment as Israel continued to raze Palestinian projects in the West Bank built with European aid money – projects for solar panels, clinics and kindergartens. Catherine Ashton, the EU’s foreign policy chief, was also infuriated by Israel’s continued blanking of her request to stop forced-eviction notices and home demolitions for Palestinians living in Area C, the part of the West Bank under complete Israeli control. Assessing the new guidelines, Eldar said: “The Israeli government didn’t take the Europeans too seriously and crossed over from just ignoring them to humiliating them. ”

There are now some 520,000 Jewish settlers living in the Palestinian West Bank and East Jerusalem, while settlements construction currently runs at a seven-year high. The settlements’ project – and the military apparatus that enables it – is by far Israel’s biggest and longest-running national project, diverting a size of the national budget that remains a mystery because settlements funding is so diffuse, cross-departmental and opaque.

The new EU guidelines don’t affect trade – the EU is Israel’s largest trading partner – and it is not clear how much of a financial hit on settlements the new guidelines represent. When the Israeli government convened an emergency meeting following the EU’s announcement, some attendees spoke worryingly of adverse effects on the economy, academia, sports and culture.

But far more important is the potential of a turning tide on Israel. As Mr Bahour explained: “No one issue [is] going to bring the occupation to [an] end. But the incremental holding of Israel to account is going to have a cumulative significance – and the goal now is to allow this to gain traction”.

Mr Bahour thinks that the EU-wide guidelines could give a green light for countries to take similar actions on an independent basis. Or, there could be more such coordinated directives: Ms Ashton has already indicated that, in line with the EU’s opposition to settlements, she expects comprehensive guidelines on labelling settlement products to be produced by the end of this year.

The peace talks may or may not achieve results. But in terms of brokerage, perhaps Europe is finally overtaking the US in clout and potential for real, meaningful change in the Middle East.

Rachel Shabi is a journalist and the author of Not the Enemy – Israel’s Jews from Arab Lands
On Twitter: @rachshabi

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.