Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters, informing them of issues, events, debates and the wider context of the conflict. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________
Leon Rosselson, letter to the Guardian, 28 July 2014

“Before the current round of violence, the West Bank had been relatively quiet for years,” writes Jonathan Freedland (Israel’s fears are real, but this war is utterly self-defeating, 26 July). According to B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights centre, 90 West Bank Palestinians were killed, 16 of them children, by the IDF or by settlers between January 2009 and May 2014. According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, there have been 2,100 settler attacks since 2006, involving beatings, shootings, vandalising schools, homes, mosques, churches and destroying olive groves. According to Amnesty International, between January 2011 and December 2013, Israeli violence resulted in injuries to 1,500 Palestinian children. “Relatively quiet” for whom?
_____________________

Posts

Supreme Court rules Zoabi ban illegal: right wing vows to change law

The news report from Ynet is followed by a Ha’aretz editorial (written before the decision) on this ‘political crusade against all the Arab political parties’.

Supreme Court: MK Zoabi can run for Knesset

Special, nine-judge panel renders unanimous ruling overturning Central Election Committee’s decision to disqualify controversial Knesset member from nearing elections. Likud’s MK Danon insists: Her days in Knesset are numbered

By Aviel Magnezi, Ynet news
December 30, 2012

The Supreme Court has overturned the Central Election Committee’s decision to disqualify MK Hanin Zoabi (Balad) from running for a Knesset seat in the upcoming elections.

Sunday’s ruling, rendered by a special panel of nine judges headed by Supreme Court President Asher Grunis, was unanimous.

“The court’s decision proves that the attempts to have me disqualified were the result of political and personal persecution against me, against my party and against the Arab public as a whole,” Zoabi said in a statement released moments after the ruling.

“The motions to have me disqualified were devoid of any legal merit. Still, this ruling does little to erase the threats, delegitimization and physical as well as verbal abuse that I have endured – in and outside the Knesset – over the past three years.”

The ruling, she added, “Proves that the Election Committee abused its authority. Balad and I will not be deterred by the delegitimization attempts made against us.

“We won’t allow anyone – in or outside of the Knesset – to decide the Arab public’s position or limit our political aspirations. We will continue fighting against racism and the occupation and we will continue to dutifully represent the Arab public.”

Attorney Hassan Jabarin, head of Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, who represented Zoabi, welcomed the decision: “All disqualification motions against Arab parties and Knesset members over the past 15 years had no legal merit and were meant only to delegitimize elected Arab officials.

“Zoabi’s case is different because there was also an attempt by the Right wing of the Knesset to portray her at a terrorist, despite the fact the she has never been charged with any crime.

“We welcome the ruling, which above all shows that the Central Election Committee was wrong.”

‘Court decision regrettable’
The Likud-Beiteinu campaign issued a statement following the Supreme Court’s decision, saying it was “regrettable.”

We regret the Supreme Court’s decision to allow MK Zoabi to vie for a Knesset seat. Given the court’s interpretation of the law it is obvious that the law must change and clearly state that anyone supporting terror is automatically disqualified from being a Knesset member.

The Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu will use their next parliamentary term to amend the existing law.

MK Ofir Akunis (Likud), who promoted the bid to disqualify Zoabi issued the following statement:

After two years of considerable efforts to have MK Zoabi disqualified – out of the deep belief that democracy has the right to defend itself against those who seek to destroy it from within – the court has spoken.

I deeply regret the Supreme Court’s decision, but I respect it. I will continue to use the parliamentary tools at my disposal to protect and fortify Israel’s democracy.

MK Yuval Zellner (Kadima) echoed the sentiment:

I regret the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding MK Zoabi. She systematically and actively acted against IDF soldiers and the values of the State of Israel.

“Unfortunately, instead of focusing on promoting the legitimate needs of her constituents, Zoabi acted foolishly and compromised the fragile coexistence between Arabs and Jews.

MK Danny Danon (Likud) stated that while he respected the court’s decision, he found it “unacceptable.”

“Today, the court decided to back the Marmara’s terrorist instead of the Navy Commandos, using Zoabi’s parliamentary immunity as a shield. Zoabi belongs in prison.”

Danon stated that once the new Knesset is sworn in, he intends to promote a bill that would ensure that the Election Committee’s right to disqualify lists whose members incite racism or negate the existence of Israel, is upheld. The Election Committee jurisdiction on the matter is detailed in Basic Law: The Knesset.

“The ‘Zoabi law’ will be enacted and she can be sure that her days in the Knesset are numbered,” Danon exclaimed.

Fellow Likud MK Tzipi Hotovely lamented the decision, saying “The court has sent a message to the Arab MKs, saying that they can abuse their position, speak against the State of Israel and get away with it.”

Attorney Nidal Othman, of the Coalition against Racism, welcomed the decision: “The court proved today that it was a beacon of sanity in the midst of the racist atmosphere in Israel.

The Elections Committee’s racist decision was overturned by the Supreme Court, which upheld its duty as the protector of elected officials.

“The Elections Committee’s racist decision made a mockery of the principles of democracy. It is only right that the power to disqualify (lists) is removed from its hands and placed with a legislative authority.

MK Dov Khenin (Hadash) commented on the Supreme Court’s decision to allow MK Zoabi to run for the Knesset, saying that the court “thwarted a takeover attempt by Netanyahu.”

“It’s very disconcerting that the ruling party will stop at nothing, even compromise democracy, to gain a few more ballots.”

Hassan Shaalan, Yoval Karni and Moran Azulay contributed to this report


The Zuabi test

There is no fine or vague line between terror and expressing an opinion that opposes the occupation or identifies with the Palestinians; the gap between the two is wide and deep.

Haaretz Editorial
Decemvbr 30, 2012

“There is no sufficient, exceptional critical mass of evidence in the matter of Zuabi,” equivocated Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, as he explained his objection to disqualifying Balad MK Hanin Zuabi’s candidacy for the 19th Knesset.

The High Court of Justice on Thursday heard Zuabi’s appeal of the decision by the Central Elections Committee, headed by Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, to block her from running. Ostensibly, the High Court need only weigh and measure the volume of that “critical mass,” but its ruling will also determine whether there exists in Israel a sufficient critical mass of democracy.

There is no fine or vague line between terror and expressing an opinion that opposes the occupation or identifies with the Palestinians. The gap between the two is wide and deep. One can assume that if the attorney general believed that Zuabi had committed a crime against the state by being on the Mavi Marmara during the May 2010 flotilla that attempted to break the blockade on Gaza, he wouldn’t have closed the case against her. That decision by Weinstein should have been sufficient for the Central Elections Committee. But we’re not dealing with rules of evidence or the definition of terror; what we’re dealing with is a political crusade against all the Arab political parties.

A democratic society is not measured by the power of the majority or by its capitulation to political consensus. The real test of a democracy is its ability to allow room for the expression of irregular, aggravating, critical positions, including those that seemingly undermine democracy itself. A strong democracy isn’t spooked by the voices and opinions of those who don’t see the state and its policies as the pinnacle of creation. By contrast, a state that grasps the excuse of “defensive democracy” in order to stifle political opponents isn’t worthy of being called a democracy.

The justices on Thursday saw with their own eyes how those who see the court as an obstacle to doing as they please acted violently against the Balad representatives and threatened to harm Zuabi. But it wasn’t just rabble that had assembled at the court – there were also MKs there who, if they only could, would do away with the High Court of Justice altogether. Overturning Zuabi’s disqualification would not just be a course correction for a democracy that has gone off-course, but a test of the High Court’s ability to be a defensive barrier for its loyalists against those who take potshots at it.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.