Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters, informing them of issues, events, debates and the wider context of the conflict. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

Action Alerts


Support Amnesty International's campaign to Bring Mordechai Vanunu to London in June
_____________________

Did you know?



Settlements Generate Virtually No Economic Activity
"A recent Israeli government report estimated there are…$250 million in annual exports — [only] 0.55 percent of the national total — from the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, territories the international community generally considers illegally occupied."
Jodi Rodoren cited by Richard Silverstein, 22 Jan 2014

Daily acts of violence committed by Jewish Israeli citizens against West Bank Palestinians
"These incidents — now particularly heightened during the olive harvest season — are not the aberration from the norm, but a regular feature of life in the occupied West Bank. In 2012, over 7,500 Palestinian olive trees were destroyed. In the 5-year period between 2007 and 2011, there was a 315 percent increase in settler violence."
Mairav Zonszein, Israel Must Stop Settler Violence, 8 November 2013
______
Police impunity
After their own investigations establishing a prima facie violation, Btselem has lodged over 280 complaints of alleged police violence in the oPt since the start of the second Intifada: "we are aware of only 12 indictments" Btselem April 2013
______
Runners in the first ever Bethlehem Marathon were forced to run two laps of the same course on Sunday 21 April 2013, as Palestinians were unable to find a single stretch of free land that is 26 miles long in Area A, where the PA has both security and civil authority. See Marathon report
______
30th March, land day.
On 30 March 1976, thousands of Palestinians living as a minority in Israel mounted a general strike and organised protests against Israeli government plans to expropriate almost 15,000 acres of Palestinian land in the Galilee.The Israeli government, led by prime minister Yitzhak Rabin and defence minister Shimon Peres, sent in the army to break up the general strike. The Israeli army killed six unarmed Palestinians, wounded hundreds and arrested hundreds more, including political activists. All were citizens of Israel.
______
* Out of 103 investigations opened in 2012 into alleged offences committed by Israeli soldiers in the occupied territories, not a single indictment served to date
Yesh Din, 3 Feb 2013
______
* In total, out of an area of 1.6 million dunams in the Jordan Valley, Israel has seized 1.25 million − some 77.5 percent − where Palestinians are forbidden to enter.
Haaretz editorial, 4 Feb 2013
_____________________

Posts

Supreme Court rules Zoabi ban illegal: right wing vows to change law

The news report from Ynet is followed by a Ha’aretz editorial (written before the decision) on this ‘political crusade against all the Arab political parties’.

Supreme Court: MK Zoabi can run for Knesset

Special, nine-judge panel renders unanimous ruling overturning Central Election Committee’s decision to disqualify controversial Knesset member from nearing elections. Likud’s MK Danon insists: Her days in Knesset are numbered

By Aviel Magnezi, Ynet news
December 30, 2012

The Supreme Court has overturned the Central Election Committee’s decision to disqualify MK Hanin Zoabi (Balad) from running for a Knesset seat in the upcoming elections.

Sunday’s ruling, rendered by a special panel of nine judges headed by Supreme Court President Asher Grunis, was unanimous.

“The court’s decision proves that the attempts to have me disqualified were the result of political and personal persecution against me, against my party and against the Arab public as a whole,” Zoabi said in a statement released moments after the ruling.

“The motions to have me disqualified were devoid of any legal merit. Still, this ruling does little to erase the threats, delegitimization and physical as well as verbal abuse that I have endured – in and outside the Knesset – over the past three years.”

The ruling, she added, “Proves that the Election Committee abused its authority. Balad and I will not be deterred by the delegitimization attempts made against us.

“We won’t allow anyone – in or outside of the Knesset – to decide the Arab public’s position or limit our political aspirations. We will continue fighting against racism and the occupation and we will continue to dutifully represent the Arab public.”

Attorney Hassan Jabarin, head of Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, who represented Zoabi, welcomed the decision: “All disqualification motions against Arab parties and Knesset members over the past 15 years had no legal merit and were meant only to delegitimize elected Arab officials.

“Zoabi’s case is different because there was also an attempt by the Right wing of the Knesset to portray her at a terrorist, despite the fact the she has never been charged with any crime.

“We welcome the ruling, which above all shows that the Central Election Committee was wrong.”

‘Court decision regrettable’
The Likud-Beiteinu campaign issued a statement following the Supreme Court’s decision, saying it was “regrettable.”

We regret the Supreme Court’s decision to allow MK Zoabi to vie for a Knesset seat. Given the court’s interpretation of the law it is obvious that the law must change and clearly state that anyone supporting terror is automatically disqualified from being a Knesset member.

The Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu will use their next parliamentary term to amend the existing law.

MK Ofir Akunis (Likud), who promoted the bid to disqualify Zoabi issued the following statement:

After two years of considerable efforts to have MK Zoabi disqualified – out of the deep belief that democracy has the right to defend itself against those who seek to destroy it from within – the court has spoken.

I deeply regret the Supreme Court’s decision, but I respect it. I will continue to use the parliamentary tools at my disposal to protect and fortify Israel’s democracy.

MK Yuval Zellner (Kadima) echoed the sentiment:

I regret the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding MK Zoabi. She systematically and actively acted against IDF soldiers and the values of the State of Israel.

“Unfortunately, instead of focusing on promoting the legitimate needs of her constituents, Zoabi acted foolishly and compromised the fragile coexistence between Arabs and Jews.

MK Danny Danon (Likud) stated that while he respected the court’s decision, he found it “unacceptable.”

“Today, the court decided to back the Marmara’s terrorist instead of the Navy Commandos, using Zoabi’s parliamentary immunity as a shield. Zoabi belongs in prison.”

Danon stated that once the new Knesset is sworn in, he intends to promote a bill that would ensure that the Election Committee’s right to disqualify lists whose members incite racism or negate the existence of Israel, is upheld. The Election Committee jurisdiction on the matter is detailed in Basic Law: The Knesset.

“The ‘Zoabi law’ will be enacted and she can be sure that her days in the Knesset are numbered,” Danon exclaimed.

Fellow Likud MK Tzipi Hotovely lamented the decision, saying “The court has sent a message to the Arab MKs, saying that they can abuse their position, speak against the State of Israel and get away with it.”

Attorney Nidal Othman, of the Coalition against Racism, welcomed the decision: “The court proved today that it was a beacon of sanity in the midst of the racist atmosphere in Israel.

The Elections Committee’s racist decision was overturned by the Supreme Court, which upheld its duty as the protector of elected officials.

“The Elections Committee’s racist decision made a mockery of the principles of democracy. It is only right that the power to disqualify (lists) is removed from its hands and placed with a legislative authority.

MK Dov Khenin (Hadash) commented on the Supreme Court’s decision to allow MK Zoabi to run for the Knesset, saying that the court “thwarted a takeover attempt by Netanyahu.”

“It’s very disconcerting that the ruling party will stop at nothing, even compromise democracy, to gain a few more ballots.”

Hassan Shaalan, Yoval Karni and Moran Azulay contributed to this report


The Zuabi test

There is no fine or vague line between terror and expressing an opinion that opposes the occupation or identifies with the Palestinians; the gap between the two is wide and deep.

Haaretz Editorial
Decemvbr 30, 2012

“There is no sufficient, exceptional critical mass of evidence in the matter of Zuabi,” equivocated Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, as he explained his objection to disqualifying Balad MK Hanin Zuabi’s candidacy for the 19th Knesset.

The High Court of Justice on Thursday heard Zuabi’s appeal of the decision by the Central Elections Committee, headed by Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, to block her from running. Ostensibly, the High Court need only weigh and measure the volume of that “critical mass,” but its ruling will also determine whether there exists in Israel a sufficient critical mass of democracy.

There is no fine or vague line between terror and expressing an opinion that opposes the occupation or identifies with the Palestinians. The gap between the two is wide and deep. One can assume that if the attorney general believed that Zuabi had committed a crime against the state by being on the Mavi Marmara during the May 2010 flotilla that attempted to break the blockade on Gaza, he wouldn’t have closed the case against her. That decision by Weinstein should have been sufficient for the Central Elections Committee. But we’re not dealing with rules of evidence or the definition of terror; what we’re dealing with is a political crusade against all the Arab political parties.

A democratic society is not measured by the power of the majority or by its capitulation to political consensus. The real test of a democracy is its ability to allow room for the expression of irregular, aggravating, critical positions, including those that seemingly undermine democracy itself. A strong democracy isn’t spooked by the voices and opinions of those who don’t see the state and its policies as the pinnacle of creation. By contrast, a state that grasps the excuse of “defensive democracy” in order to stifle political opponents isn’t worthy of being called a democracy.

The justices on Thursday saw with their own eyes how those who see the court as an obstacle to doing as they please acted violently against the Balad representatives and threatened to harm Zuabi. But it wasn’t just rabble that had assembled at the court – there were also MKs there who, if they only could, would do away with the High Court of Justice altogether. Overturning Zuabi’s disqualification would not just be a course correction for a democracy that has gone off-course, but a test of the High Court’s ability to be a defensive barrier for its loyalists against those who take potshots at it.

Print Friendly
Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.