Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



When 1 and 1 don’t make 2

Contrary to the laws of math

How did it happen that Israel is endangering the solid Jewish majority that lives in 78 percent of the area of the Land of Israel, because it wants to annex another 3 percent in the West Bank?

Shaul Arieli, 23 July 2012

For years, Israelis have ranked low in the sciences and mathematics – 41 out of 64 countries, according to the Program for International Student Assessment tests. That is not surprising when one examines the conduct of the state with respect to teaching these subjects, especially in the past decade. Following are a few simple mathematical problems whose answers could have gotten more than half the country out in the streets demonstrating if we had only studied the way we should have in elementary school.

For example, how is it possible that 92 percent of the population is not capable of making the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox ) sector – whose proportion in the general population does not exceed 8 percent – share the burden of military service and take part in the work force, while allowing it to continue to be supported by generous funding? And when it comes to residing over the Green Line, why is the Haredi population there, which for the most part is not Zionist, five times larger than it is in proportion to the greater Jewish public living in Israel proper? Where do the Israelis who live in the territories work if fewer than 7 percent of the construction in Judea and Samaria is used for purposes of agriculture and industry, while all the rest is for residential and public buildings?

Why does 91 percent of the Jewish public inside Israel allow the 9 percent that live beyond the Green Line to determine the image, face and moral status of the country in the eyes of the international community? And how does that fit in with the ongoing infringement of the rule of law, and the undermining of the Israel Defense Forces and of human rights? Why does the majority agree that many billions of shekels be channeled to the welfare state over the Green Line when others living in the country are not allowed to enjoy the same benefits?

How does 1 percent of the Jewish population – which is supposed to be removed from its homes in a final-status agreement with the Palestinians – succeed in preventing an evacuation process that could benefit the other 99 percent of the population in the State of Israel and the large settlement blocs? And how did the 20 settlements in which less than 1 percent of the Jewish population lives succeed in getting the government to propose in talks with the Palestinians the creation of a border that annexes them to Israel – a line that is twice as long as the Green Line and would cost the state billions of shekels to build and maintain?

How did it happen that Israel is endangering the solid Jewish majority that lives in 78 percent of the area of the Land of Israel which is under its sovereignty, merely because of its greed to annex another 3 percent in the West Bank? How is it possible that, within the framework of an exchange of lands with the Palestinians, Israel is offering to hand over agricultural lands in communities in the Gaza envelope, the Lachish region, the area of Arad and the Beit She’an Valley – some of whose communities date back to the Tower and Stockade period before the establishment of the state – in order to reserve large swaths of land for new settlements and settlers that have not yet been born?

Why does Israel refuse to absorb several thousand Palestinian refugees on a humanitarian basis for reasons of family reunification, when it time and again declares that under any final-status agreement Jerusalem will remain united under Israeli sovereignty, which will make the city’s 350,000 Palestinian residents Israeli citizens? And how is it that, in the same breath, there are government ministers who propose that 10 percent of the country’s Arab citizens should be transfered to a Palestinian state when it is established – even though the price of such a move would be destruction of the state’s relations with the other 90 percent of Israeli Arabs who would remain here?

In order to explain this kind of mathematics, one does not need a government that is supported by 94 coalition members, of which 43 are ministers or deputy ministers. Moreover, all of them together have not succeeded in passing even one decision based on the rules of mathematics that we have learned in elementary school.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.