Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



The banality of IDF violence

btselemlogo21 May 2009: B’Tselem and ACRI demand investigation of officers who testified to a policy of routine use of violence against Palestinian civilians

Following an item published on 15 May on the NRG website, B’Tselem and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel have called on the chief of staff and the judge advocate general to order a Military Police investigation. The item, “A Blow is Sometimes an Integral Part of the Mission,” by Roi Sharon, presented segments of the testimonies of Col. Itai Virob, commander of Kfir Brigade, and of Lt. Col. Shimon, commander of Shimshon Battalion, before a military court, which painted a harsh picture of deliberate use of violence against Palestinians.

The testimonies clearly indicate that orders the two commanders issued included permission for extensive use of violence and injurious, even lethal means, against Palestinians, and harassment. The two explained that sweeping permission was given to forces under their command to use direct physical violence “to extract information,” and as part of what is referred to as “interrogation.”

In part of his testimony, Col. Virob stated that:
The mission is to try to upset the equilibrium of the neighborhood, village, or particular location, to get information […] or to cause a hostile entity inside the village to make mistakes as a result or in reaction to actions of our forces, and thus disrupt his activity and expose it. The acts of disruption can be done at a number of levels. The first is entering the village. Jeeps speed to the entrance of the village. Sometimes, just entering the village disrupts the perpetrator. The second way is to use pressure, throwing stun grenades, breaking into a number of houses or institutions in the village, arresting residents, seizing areas on rooftops, and the like […]
We will detain, interrogate and use suitable pressure on every person to get to the one terrorist. Of all the means of pressure that we use, the vast majority are against persons who are not involved. This is true of the checkpoints, of combing whole neighborhoods, and also of questioning passersby […] Standing them against the wall, pushing, a blow that doesn’t cause injury. These are things that certainly are commonly used in an attempt to accomplish the mission. Discretion is dictated by the suspicion that terrorist actions or a disturbance of the peace is taking place […]

Searching for an address can lead to use of pressure on an innocent bystander, search for weapons, a suspicion of threat to a force on a traffic artery. There is a difference between going to a village where there isn’t a threat and you don’t suspect anything, and going on a mission given you, where aggressiveness toward every one of the residents in the village is common.”

Lt. Col. Shimon also testified to the permission to use force:
When these people are interrogated, they might be put up against the wall, and cuffs or flannel [cloth blindfold] might be put on them, and it might be – I rely on the commanders’ judgment – that somebody gave a slap or blow to try to extract information […]

There are no exercises, nothing written. You enter, speak with residents, and if you feel a shirt being grabbed, shouting, and there is something suspicious – sometimes, when you live the field, this is the feeling – they feel that this is a guy they can get information from, and sometimes, to achieve this, they use force.”

These orders, which indicate routine use of violence and potentially injury-causing, including lethal, means against civilians, and harassing them, are patently illegal.

Complaints regarding military conduct of this kind have been filed in the past, but are usually denied by the military establishment. In light of the grave suspicions arising from the details published in the item, B’Tselem and ACRI call on the chief of staff and the judge advocate general to order an immediate Military Police investigation against Col. Virob and Lt. Col. Shimon, and to direct the investigators to investigate whether other commanders gave similar orders. In addition, the organizations demand that the chief of staff publish clear directives to all soldiers to ensure that military forces in the West Bank cease these practices.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.