Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Fighting without guns or bombs

Palestinian Tactics Set to Change
By Daniella Peled – The Arab Spring
Arab Spring Issue 19,
21 Jun 11

As voices supporting a popular, non-violent Palestinian resistance against the Israeli occupation grow, IWPR editor Daniella Peled looks at the likelihood of such a movement developing.
Are mass peaceful protests, such as seen throughout the Arab Spring, likely – and how would Israel react?
________________________________________
What examples have there been of successful non-violent Palestinian protest in the past, and what is the significance of the new calls for such a movement?
There is a general recognition within Palestinian society that the violence of the second intifada failed to achieve any progress towards Palestinian independence. The Israeli reaction to the suicide bombings and other attacks emanating from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip included multiple assassinations of key figures amongst the Palestinian armed groups, harsh closures and curfews and the building of the security barrier, which takes in large portions of the West Bank.
However, there is also the perception that conventional political negotiations have also failed to achieve any progress, with the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip still cut off from the West Bank, settlement building continuing to grow and no prospect of an agreed bilateral peace deal on the horizon.
In recent years, there has been a growing movement to find different forms of resistance against the occupation and the route of the security barrier. Most notable have been the protests at villages in the West Bank like Bi’ilin and Ni’iln, where locals together with Israeli and international activists have held weekly rallies for the last six years. Although Israel views these as violent (stones are regularly thrown at soldiers and attempts made to damage the security barrier), from the Palestinian perspective this type of protest marks a change of strategy.
Now, Palestinians hope that the Arab Spring will translate into tangible gains for them at home too, although matters are more complicated as they would have to rise against two governments – Israel’s and that of the Palestinian Authority or Hamas.
________________________________________
Does the non-violent movement have backing from the established Palestinian groups?
Non-violence is still not endorsed nationally by any Palestinian party, and remains very much on a local and grassroots level. Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, is committed to the destruction of Israel and refuses to renounce the armed struggle.
However, the Palestinian government in the West Bank is increasingly turning to diplomatic pressure as a way of gaining ground against Israel. The plan for a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood at the United Nations this September, for instance, is intended to have a serious political impact.
One area where the grassroots movements and establishment policy coincide, however, is in the arena of boycott, divestment and sanctions, BDS. Calls for such actions to be taken against Israel on an international level have been increasing both amongst Palestinian activists and politicians.
The Palestinian authorities in Gaza and the West Bank are nervous about mass protests directed at their own failings; so far the main direct effect of the Arab Spring has been to push Hamas and Fatah to sign a unity government agreement in response to popular Palestinian demands.
Palestinian activists agree that, currently, such protests are very much on a small and localised scale and a far higher degree of organisation would be needed for mass demonstrations.
________________________________________
Is non-violent action likely to win public sympathy in Israel?
The Israeli presence at protests in the West Bank remains tiny, and although the majority of Israelis favour a two-state solution – with many even supporting direct negotiations with Hamas – there is widespread disillusionment with the possibility of finding a Palestinian partner for peace. The violence at some protests has alienated the Israeli mainstream; and there is minimal sympathy for the BDS movement, which is seen as unjust and even anti-Semitic.
Other developments – such as the attempts by flotillas to breach the Gaza blockade, and two recent mass attempts at infiltrations from Syria into the occupied Golan Heights – have done little to build Israeli confidence that a genuinely non-violent Palestinian movement is possible.
While some Palestinians have described the Golan Heights incursion as a form of non-violent protest, these actions have been seen by Israel and others as orchestrated by Damascus to try and distract attention from the disturbances within Syria.
________________________________________
How is Israel likely to react to a mass non-violent movement?
The Israeli Defence Force, IDF, is taking this seriously enough to be currently preparing a new manual on how to deal with such demonstrations. They expect an upsurge in protests around the time of the September unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood.
For now, the IDF strategy is focusing on containment and trying to avoid the escalation of protests Operationally, this means ensuring they have enough forces on standby and a large amount of real-time information, so if a protest threatens to swell massively, they will be able to block it.
The IDF defines violent demonstrations as presenting a risk to Israeli soldiers’ lives or damaging security installations. In reality, this extends to stone-throwing, for instance, or attacks on structures like the security barrier.
How to prevent stone-throwing is a serious challenge by organisers of non-violent protests. It is very much seen as a symbolic part of traditional Palestinian resistance.
“I grew up throwing them and most Palestinians don’t see them as an act of violence, which complicates things,” said Aziz Abu Sarah, a Palestinian journalist and blogger
But the IDF faces two nightmare scenarios. The first is that a small group of soldiers led by a junior or inexperienced officer find themselves facing a demonstration that gets out of hand and then begin firing on the protesters, causing a large number of casualties.
The second is that however well prepared the IDF is in terms of manpower, training and riot dispersal equipment, some 10,000 Palestinians march on a settlement or the separation fence and refuses to turn back, despite the IDF use of tear gas and rubber bullets. In that case, the IDF are aware that the only options they have are letting them do whatever they want or a huge loss of life.
Daniella Peled is an IWPR editor.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.