Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011




MachsomWatch activist and JfJfP signatory Susan Lourenco interviewed

haaretz.comMachsom Watch activist: Removing checkpoints doesn’t remove the occupation

Susan Lourenco speaks out after the Hawara checkpoint is removed.

Jack Khoury, 15 February 2011

Susan Lourenco has volunteered for the Machsom Watch organization for seven years, so she is familiar with virtually every Israeli army checkpoint in the West Bank. She is extremely well-acquainted with the Hawara crossing near Nablus – one of the symbols of the occupation and its control over the Palestinian civilian population – having spent many long hours there together with other women active in the organization.

Last Friday, Haaretz reported that the army would withdraw its forces from Hawara and dismantle the checkpoint. At Machsom Watch, the report was received with satisfaction. But group also warned that there is nothing dramatic about this step, as it will ultimately not reduce Israel’s control over the civilian population in the West Bank. In the final analysis, Machsom Watch’s aim is not to remove a few scattered checkpoints, but to end the occupation.

machsom - David Bachar - February 15 2011 Lourenco in her Jaffa home. “The soldiers treated everyone as if they were terrorists. In effect, they reflect the Israeli view of the Palestinians.”
Photo by: David Bachar

Let’s begin on a personal note. At 75, you’re still active in the organization?

“Yes, I’m still active and I still go to checkpoints, both those in the central [West Bank], like Hawara, and in the northern West Bank, in the area of Jenin, and sometimes also in the south, near Mount Hebron. You know, I’m not alone; there are many other volunteer activists who, like me, station themselves at checkpoints practically every day.”

Would you say the Hawara checkpoint was one of the worst in the West Bank?

“Yes, it was a very bad checkpoint, where many Palestinians suffered. We stood there and saw how everyone was treated, men and women alike. The wait lasted for hours upon hours, in the rains of winter and in the terrible heat of summer.

“You saw men, women and children standing there waiting for body searches, and car searches carried out in a humiliating fashion, by putting dogs inside them. We’ve seen [the humiliation] in peoples’ eyes. Putting dogs in the cars is insulting.”

Can you recall a specific incident?

“Yes. In one case a very sick woman arrived at the checkpoint with her husband and waited a very long time. They did not allow the husband to enter Israel with his sick wife. It was horrible to see. I’m not saying such terrible things happen every day.”

How did the soldiers behave toward the Palestinians?

“The soldiers treated everyone as if they were terrorists. In effect, they reflect the Israeli view of the Palestinians. Everyone is suspected of being involved in terror. This is expressed in the way people are treated: Everyone is a suspect, so this is how they act.

“I am not saying the soldiers are responsible for everything that happens. In the end, we are talking about an occupation, and the checkpoint is one of its symbols. It should be noted that there were always settlers standing near the soldiers who cursed and humiliated the Palestinians.”

Did the soldiers collaborate with the settlers?

“I am not saying the soldiers collaborated with the settlers, but [settlers] always stood there and were not prevented from picking on the Palestinians and humiliating them. It had nothing to do with whether [the Palestinians] were suspected of anything or not. They humiliated everyone.”

How did the soldiers react to your presence?

“They didn’t always like us being there – as if we disturbed them in carrying out their work and the process of the security checks. From their point of view, they are doing their job, carrying out orders to maintain Israeli security, and they see everything from a security standpoint.”

So the removal of the Hawara checkpoint will make things easier for the Palestinian population and allow freedom of movement between Nablus and Ramallah?

“That’s true, but it isn’t enough. It is impossible to say that removing checkpoints is a solution to the Palestinian problem in the West Bank. In other places where checkpoints have been removed, it,has not changed the overall picture significantly.

“The Palestinians’ problem now is not only the checkpoints. There are other things, such as the refusal to grant permits to move from place to place, or to enter Jerusalem or leave the West Bank. Everything requires an Israeli permit, and sometimes this takes a lot of time.

“This is a very painful matter, but it isn’t sexy and doesn’t make for photo ops like the checkpoints do, so people hardly talk about it. There are many people who cannot leave the West Bank because of some security prohibition or another. In the end, the checkpoint is just another symbol of the occupation. Removing them does not remove the occupation.”

Do you think Machsom Watch is responsible for the removal of the Hawara checkpoint?

“I don’t know whether the army is influenced by our activities. What is certain is that the army knows we are active on the ground and will see to it that what happens is made public. But most of our activity is not against the army. We work to explain to the Israeli public what happens at the checkpoints, which are one of the symbols of the occupation, and that the checkpoints are not meant to protect Israeli citizens, but rather the settlers, so that they can continue to control the land.”

Do you see the removal of the checkpoint as your victory?

“If so, only partly. The occupation remains the same occupation both before and after the Hawara checkpoint, so it is impossible to call it a victory.”

Do you think the decision to remove it marks a coming change in policy?

“Not at all. As we read it, this is a kind of situation assessment by the army and makes no significant statement about the future. Tomorrow or in two weeks, they can bring the checkpoint back to Hawara or to someplace else, and the occupation still exists.”

Will you continue to demonstrate a presence at other checkpoints?

“Definitely. We will continue our activities at the checkpoints, with an emphasis on the ones at the entrances to Jerusalem and in the vicinity of Qalqilyah, Jenin and Tul Karm. But as I said, our main goal is to remove the occupation, not just the checkpoints.”

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.