Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Free all the prisoners!


Free all the Prisoners!

Rabbibrian’s blog, posted by rabbibrian on 3 January 2011

My friend and fellow blogger, Richard Silverstein, just shared this poster created by Michael Levin.  The singular focus in Israel and the American Jewish community on the release of Gilad Shalit is profoundly problematic.  Why is this one person’s imprisonment more important than the thousands of Palestinian prisoners from the West Bank,  including over 300 children minors held in Israeli prisons?  Gilad Shalit should be freed just as the Palestinian prisoners should be freed.  The families of the Palestinian prisoners face enormous obstacles visiting their loved ones held behind bars.

I encourage you to share the poster with others.

Abdullah Abu Rahmeh is a leader of Palestinian non-violent resistance on the West Bank;  Ameer Makhoul is an Israeli Palestinian citizen, an advocate for the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel.

You can find  statistics on Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails here.

Responses to “Free all the Prisoners!” to date (18 January)

  1. Keren Batiyov said

    January 4, 2011 at 5:22 am Brian,
    This poster is fantastic and conveys as you noted so “profoundly” the one-sided focus of Israel and the West, particularly in the Jewish community, on Gilad Shalit. Your commitment to justice for all is so inspiring. I’ve posted the poster on my FaceBook page and will forward it on to others. Thank you for sharing this with all of us and thank you especially for living the prophetic tenets of Judaism!
    In Solidarity,

  2. Naomi Paz Greenberg said

    January 4, 2011 at 12:09 pm Sorry. I do not entirely agree.

    In a civil society there is always some number of individuals who cannot restrain themselves. A responsible society must restrain them. Which should not be misunderstood to mean that I am somehow comfortable with imprisonment without trial, or detainees, who must be given fair trials with competent legal counsel. All prisoners, even those guilty of the most reprehensible crimes, should be able to have visitors, if only under very controlled circumstances.

    There is misuse of authority in Israel as well as the US and countless other countries. That should not be tolerated. But there can also be appropriate use of authority, which is a duty of a responsible society.

    I think it is always dangerous (except in this sentence) to make, or appear to make, sweeping generalizations. It makes us sound irresponsible and may actually make the real message harder to hear, namely, that the human rights of all should be honored and defended without compromise, and that wherever possible a measure of tenderness should also be exercised.


    • rabbibrian said

      January 4, 2011 at 1:13 pm Naomi,

      Thanks for your comment. The poster conveys the double standard regarding the treatment of Palestinian prisoners and Gilad Shalit, the one Israeli prisoner. Some of the Palestinian prisoners have been tried in a military court on the West Bank, hardly a fair procedure in terms of justice. Many of them have not been tried, some are held under Administrative detention, held for extended periods of imprisonment without any trial and some are prisoners who are held without anyone knowing that they are imprisoned. Over 300 are children. In this context, focusing only on Gilad Shalit seems totally unfair privileging him (because he is an Israeli Jew) over many individuals (because they are Palestinians) who suffer a similar and in many cases, worse injustice that he.

      I think the main point is that when we talk about Gilad Shalit, we must also talk about Palestinian prisoners.

      Thanks again for your comment.

  3. Naomi Paz Greenberg said

    January 5, 2011 at 9:27 am I agree. I took a long time to post my original comment because I couldn’t find the sweeping generalization in your post nor could I find it in the poster. And yet there was something troubling me.

    It’s the language in the thread: “Free all the prisoners!”

    Long before anyone can read the nuance in your post or in the poster, that thread, like a screaming headline, has the first word, and, as with many screaming headlines, it misrepresents.


  4. January 5, 2011 at 2:11 pm […] Silverstein put this up. Rabbi Brian Walt too. Great poster. By Michael […]

  5. January 6, 2011 at 3:20 pm If people don’t like “Free all the prisoners” then “Free all the hostages”. I imagine the numbers will be very similar.

  6. Vicky said

    January 7, 2011 at 11:32 am The Israeli government should not be detaining Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza at all, as it is an occupying power and it has no legal jurisdiction over the Palestinian population. Particularly problematic in legal terms is the transfer of Palestinian prisoners to jails within Israel (usually Ketziot and Megiddo). The Israeli authorities have no right to do this, even in the case of genuine criminals. It should be the responsibility of the PA to ensure that justice is carried out, so the call to free all the prisoners is apt – they should not be in Israeli prisons in the first place, irrespective of whether they have committed a crime or whether they are being held without charge.

    • Naomi Paz Greenberg said

      January 7, 2011 at 12:08 pm I agree.

      But can you state with certainty that all Palestinians in Israeli prisons were arrested on Palestinian land? Can you state with certainty that they were all arrested for political reasons?

      Beyond that, though, we are being diverted. I am not disagreeing with the intent of these posts. I am only asking that we are careful in what we say, especially in a public forum.

      This blog offers an opportunity for considered reflection by well-intentioned people. Why not avail ourselves of that?

      Shabbat Shalom to all,

      • ElaineM said

        January 7, 2011 at 12:36 pm Obviously, not all Palestinian prisoners have been arrested for political reasons. Some are simply criminals and, hopefully, received prison sentence commensurate with their crimes.

        What we can say is that all the Palestinian prisoners in Israel or in the P.O.T were arrested in the historic land of Palestine.

        Thank you for the civility in expressing your point of view.


    • Y. Ben-David said

      January 14, 2011 at 2:56 am Your claim that Israel has no jurisdiction in the West Bank is ridiculous. UN Security Council Resolution 242 gives Israel authority as a military occupying power there pending the conclusion of a peace agreement, which includes law enforcement. The Oslo Agreements were drawn up on the basis this agreement. Thus, although the Palestinian Authority has the power to arrest and convict criminals, if they abidate this responsibility, it then falls on the Israeli authroties. A recent example of this were the six Palestinian convicted of first-degree murder of 4 Israelis a few months ago. The Palestinain arrested them and sentenced them to prison. A “benevolent, merciful” Abbas then pardoned them after a few months incarceration, so Israel then moved in and arrested them a few days ago, all of this in accord with 242 and the Oslo Agreements.

      • Naomi Paz Greenberg said

        January 14, 2011 at 11:06 am This post is in response to Y Ben-David and ElaineM.

        If we wish to claim legitimacy for any position, history is ambivalent. You are required to say history began on a certain date. By one standard you can call it the historic land of Palestine. By another, Israel. Both standards are flawed unless you believe no human beings occupied the area before there were written records. Even archaeology relies on assumptions.

        To claim that the final word comes from the UN Security Council is just as flawed. Many people posting to this and other blogs have profound arguments with decisions and even the constituent memberships of the security council, though we may differ about what we don’t agree with the UN on.

        And both arguments prove nothing.

        Many of us are posting to this blog from lands which were occupied by Native Americans. Don’t ask me which ones, that again would depend on how far back you want to read history, and on who is writing that history (hint: the victors).

        And, by the way, why can I not reclaim the farm in northern Germany that was confiscated from my Jewish grandparents? And by what right was that land ever sold to them? By whom?

        I think we can agree that many people on every side have suffered too much during every war or hostile situation which is not called a war, such as occupation.

        I think we can agree that national leaders often behave like enemies of peace.

        I think we must agree to set aside any notions of exceptionalism. We are all human, all flawed, we have all accepted certain claims without skepticism.

        I hope we can agree that however this ongoing crisis in Israel-Palestine and the region is resolved, nobody will ever be restored to what existed before. Losses will not be recovered. Grieving will not end.

        And yet it is possible in the face of all of that to proceed with an intention to do no more harm.

        Consider for a moment the spirit in which the Amish parents of those schoolgirls reached out to the parents of the man who murdered their children. Consider the spirit in which the parents of a Palestinian boy killed by the IDF, and the parents of a Jewish teenager killed by a suicide bomber in moments of shock and grief allowed organs of their dead children to be donated to members of the ‘other side.’ Those parents knew right then and there that there is no other side, and that there is only one way forward and that is to avoid hurting more people and to help those we can help.

        The first requirement of such a future is a refusal by each of to continue to nurture grudges.

        However legitimate we may feel those grudges to be, we are selective in what we choose to remember as intolerable and what we choose to tolerate.

        The alternative is that our great-grandchildren will slaughter one another because of our legacy of grudges. Is that really what we want them to inherit?


  7. Y. Ben-David said

    January 10, 2011 at 12:13 pm I want this to be clear-
    When you say you all advocate freeing all the prisoners, does this include those like Marwan Barghouti who was convicted of five counts of first-degree murder (one of his victims was a girl who had attended my synagogue) and those of HAMAS and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades that planned and/or helped carry out the series of suicide bombings that killed or wounded thousands of Israelis? These are on the list of prisoners that HAMAS is demanding be freed in return for Gilad Shalit.

  8. January 13, 2011 at 2:48 pm The disproportion you mention is strikingly illustrated on Alison Weir’s excellent site If Americans Knew. She shows graphically how Palestinian deaths are vastly under-reported if even reported at all. Placed side by side with reporting on Israeli deaths, the contrast is stark and telling. The prisoner issue is only more of the same.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.