Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Gazans abandoned as PA puts the Goldstone report on ice


Gaza victims trumped by talks

Fred Abrahams 4 October 2010

Late last week the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah sent a cruel message to the civilian victims of laws-of-war violations during the Gaza conflict: we won’t demand justice for your suffering.

The message came in the form of a resolution drafted by the Palestinian Authority at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva. The PA had the chance to increase pressure on Israel and Hamas to punish those responsible for war crimes. Instead, it opted to tread water, stalling justice and turning its back on victims, the vast majority of whom live in Gaza.

If critics who say the Palestinian Authority is out of touch with the needs of Palestinians require evidence, last week’s resolution provided it in spades.

According to diplomats in Geneva, Ramallah thought it needed to dampen the call for investigations to keep the fragile peace talks with Israel on track. But neglecting the victims of the conflict will not aid peace. It will undermine the already tenuous faith that many Palestinians have in the Palestinian Authority: how can it negotiate a fair settlement if it won’t demand justice for egregious crimes?

Since the Gaza war nearly two years ago, international pressure has steadily built for Israel and Hamas to conduct serious and credible investigations into alleged war crimes. A UN fact-finding mission led by Richard Goldstone documented the allegations by all sides, and the General Assembly twice demanded that the parties follow up, with a majority of European Union states joining the call. The General Assembly will review Goldstone implementation again this fall.

The unprecedented pressure brought some results: Israel and the Palestinians went further than after previous conflicts with their investigations, although Hamas has still done virtually nothing. Now the Palestinian Authority, which takes the lead in drafting UN resolutions on Palestinian affairs, has undercut that progress and potentially frozen the Goldstone report for the next six months.

Last week’s resolution addressed a report by a committee of experts on the domestic investigations by Israel, Hamas and the PA — the UN’s first independent assessment of local efforts to investigate allegations in the Goldstone report. The committee determined that both Israel and Hamas, to differing degrees, had failed to conduct credible and impartial investigations up to international standards. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, got a passing grade.

This was the opportunity for the Palestinian Authority to demand international justice, which is required when domestic mechanisms fail. It was an opportunity to send the report forward to the General Assembly, as Palestinian, Israeli and international human rights groups have requested, because the General Assembly is the main venue for keeping the Goldstone process alive.

Instead, the resolution meekly “welcomed” the report, effectively filing it in the closet, with no mention of international justice or the International Criminal Court.

The PA could not kill the accountability process altogether without being accused of completely betraying the Palestinians’ desire for justice — as happened last year when it temporarily withdrew its support for a resolution endorsing the Goldstone report. So, the resolution merely extended the mandate of the expert committee on accountability, and asked it to report back next March.

The resolution, which passed with 27 in favor, 19 abstaining and only the United States against, leaves the General Assembly without an objective analysis of domestic investigations. Instead, it has only one report to consider as it follows up on Goldstone: a formal document compiled by the Secretary-General that presents without evaluation the glowing self-assessments submitted by the Palestinians and Israelis. The expert report, by contrast, analyzed and assessed the efforts of both sides, and their failure to meet international standards for investigations.

The debate on Gaza accountability will nevertheless soon come to the General Assembly, even without formal submission of the independent experts’ report. The Palestinian Authority, as lead drafter of a resolution there, will have another opportunity to promote justice. Failure to do so again will turn a cruel message to the Palestinian people into a slap on the face.

Fred Abrahams is a Senior Advisor at Human Rights Watch.  He conducted research in Israel and Gaza for the organization during the 2008-2009 war.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.