Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Iraeli assault on the right of asylum

phr-i-logo

The Infiltration Prevention Bill: Lies and Reality

Prepared by a platform of Israeli human-rights NGOs

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel ● Amnesty International ● ASSAF – Aid to Refugees and Asylum Seekers ● Hotline For Migrant Workers ● African Refugee Development Center ● Israel Religious Action Center –  Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism ● Kav LaOved (Worker’s Hotline) ● Physicians for Human Rights

The Infiltration Prevention Law, which will first be deliberated by the Knesset’s Internal Affairs Committee on February 3, 2010, is one of the most dangerous bills ever presented in the Knesset. If the law is passed, the State of Israel’s obligations to the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees will be annulled,1 refugees who never committed a crime could be jailed for up to twenty years, refugees could be deported to their home countries in a manner that could endanger their lives, and the deeds carried out by aid organization employees and volunteers could become criminal. This report will detail the main components of the bill, and will refute many lies that serve as its premise.

Full report


Here are the reports conclusions:

D. Conclusions: The Infiltration Prevention Bill is a Form of Abuse, Not a Policy

The Infiltration Prevention Law is a foolish attempt to turn a humanitarian issue into a security and demographic issue. The facts speak for themselves. The “infiltrators” are not the 21st century version of the “fedayeen”. They are refugees from war and genocide, and victims of totalitarian regimes that torture their citizens. They do not constitute a security threat. The “flood” of migrants is not coming from the Egyptian border, but rather from Ben-Gurion International Airport, sponsored by the Israeli government and the “revolving door” policy, which it is responsible for. The obligation to defend the country’s security can be found in existing legislation. The grounds presented for the Infiltration Prevention Bill are unfounded and false.

During the Olmert administration, an inter-ministerial team was set up, which was supposed to formulate a policy to handle asylum seekers. The team was to propose solutions to a number of issues including status, health, employment, welfare, education, etc. Within the framework of a number of proceedings dealing with asylum seekers, the government informed the High Court of Justice that the team would discuss all of these issues. The team was disbanded in August 2009 without reaching any conclusions, after Yaakov Ganot, who headed the committee as well as the Immigration Authority, was appointed director general of the Transportation Ministry.

In the absence of a clear policy or solutions, the government now wants to promote the Infiltration Prevention Bill as a “magical solution.” Even though it has long since known that extended detentions of asylum seekers, who can not be deported, and the “Hot Return” to Egypt accomplished nothing. These “solutions” cost a fortune, caused a great deal of misery for the asylum seekers and may have cost refugees’ lives.

The signatories of this document call on the Israeli government to withdraw the bill and formulate a proper asylum policy. The asylum policy, which will uphold the rights of the asylum seekers and protect Israel’s interests and security concerns, must uphold the following principles:

• The State of Israel has the right to determine who can enter its borders.
• The State of Israel has the right to defend its borders.
• The State of Israel has a legal, moral and historical obligation to protect the rights of refugees. The Refugee Convention must be secured in Israeli legislation.
• The State of Israel may take measures to reduce the number people who enter the country illegally, but this may not be done while disregarding protection arrangements or the rights of refugees.
• The State of Israel will not deport or return an individual to a place where their life or freedom is in danger.
• Only a fair, accessible and effective asylum system can regulate the distinction between refugees eligible for asylum and those who ineligible. The State of Israel may deport those who are ineligible for asylum according to the law.

Full report

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.