Fencing off Jordan Valley for Israeli use

This post was held over for lack of space but its information and arguments are still timely. Articles by Al Jazeera, Ben White, MEMO and BBC news.

Map of Jordan Valley by BBC.

Israel to build wall along Jordanian border

Decision to build border fence coincides with approval of construction of almost 2,000 settler homes in occupied areas.

By Al Jazeera
November 03 2013

Israeli government has decided to build a security fence on the the border with Jordan, a report said, angering Palestinians ahead of talks with US Secretary of State.

The report published on Sunday by Israeli newspaper Maariv said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will have the construction started “immediately upon the completion of the fence on the Egyptian border”.

A spokesman for Netanyahu refused to provide details on the plan to “strengthen barriers” or comment on the Maariv report, which was picked up by the official Palestinian Wafa news agency.

The spokesman of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced the reported plans.

“The Israeli premier’s statements on building a wall in the Jordan Valley is only a proactive step to foil (US State) Secretary (John) Kerry’s visit,” Nabil Abu Rudeina told Wafa.

More settlers’ homes

Israel also issued tenders on Sunday to build 1,859 more settlers’ homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, settlement watchdog Peace Now told AFP news agency.

The organisation said that 1,031 plots were offered by Israel’s housing and construction ministry in the occupied West Bank and 828 in annexed East Jerusalem.

The successful bidders would be able to start construction shortly, the watchdog said.

“Within a few months they will choose the winning bids and the successful contractors will be able to start building within a number of weeks (after that),” the group’s Hagit Ofran said.

The move angered the Palestinians who threatened on Sunday to go to the United Nations Security Council over the issue.

“The PLO is considering a mechanism to go the Security Council and the UN against these new Israeli decisions, especially as there are international resolutions that consider settlements illegal,” Wassel Abu Youssef, Palestine Liberation Organisation senior member, told AFP.

The latest developments came ahead of Kerry’s separate meetings with Netanyahu and Abbas on Wednesday that aims to push the two sides towards peace talks.

Palestinians have accused Israel in derailing the negotiations with its settlement plans.

Bantustan Borders: Israel’s Colonisation of the Jordan Valley and the security myth

By Ben White, MEMO
November 06, 2013

At the regular cabinet meeting on Sunday, Israeli PM Netanyahu repeated a demand that as part of any future agreement with the Palestinians, Israel would maintain a “security border” in the Jordan Valley. The same day, Israeli media reported that Netanyahu has ordered the construction of a security barrier on the Jordanian border in a development that one Israeli journalist said would “finalize the West Bank’s complete closure”.

This is not the first time that Netanyahu has insisted on a long-term Israeli claim to the Jordan Valley. In 2010, for example, he told the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that “Israel would never agree to withdraw from the Jordan Valley under any peace agreement signed with the Palestinians”, while in his 2011 speech to Congress, the Israeli PM asserted that “a long-term military presence along the Jordan River” would be “absolutely vital”.

In January 2012, Netanyahu told Likud members that he would “sign a permanent agreement only if it includes Israel’s remaining in the Jordan Valley”, remarks which anonymous officials later claimed referred only to a “security presence”.

The security rationale even extends to a justification for the denial of building permits to Palestinians in the area, with an unnamed government official telling the BBC this week that “the Jordan Valley is in part a security-sensitive area”, thus making “certain areas unsuitable for private development.” Yet as with other Israeli policies such as the West Bank settlement network and the Separation Wall, Israel’s motivations when it comes to the Jordan Valley seems more based on colonisation and economic profit than on security concerns.

The targeting of Palestinian communities in the Jordan Valley for expulsion and home demolitions is sadly commonplace, with periodic bursts of evictions and destruction – such as one “wave” in summer 2010 that targeted villages pre-dating the 1967 occupation (thus paralleling the ‘legal’ façade given to the destruction of Bedouin homes in the Negev). Israeli soldiers and bulldozers attack Palestinian shepherds and families, with occupation forces even demolishing emergency shelter thrown up to help newly-homeless villagers by aid workers.

Meanwhile, Israeli settlements in the Jordan Valley continue to flourish, part of what was described already in 2006 as “de facto annexation”, and where settlement councils play a role in making sure that “in almost the entirety of the Jordan Valley, Palestinian construction is prohibited”. Using different methods, “out of an area of 1.6 million dunams in the Jordan Valley, Israel has seized 1.25 million − some 77.5 percent − where Palestinians are forbidden to enter”.

As the PA pointed out in response to Netanyahu’s recent remarks, Israel makes hundreds of millions of dollars from the settlements in the Jordan Valley, with 40% of Israeli dates exported to the European Union grown in the area’s colonies. While settlers even farm private Palestinian land, Palestinians – including children – are exploited as cheap labour. In one particularly stark example of this apartheid regime, one settlement receives water for its bananas equivalent to 25-40% of the quota granted to an entire Palestinian village for all its residents “consumption needs”.

What is happening today is a continuation of the ethnic cleansing that began following the Six Day War in 1967. The scale of the expulsions is often forgotten, but in a short period of time, an estimated 250,000 Palestinians crossed over into Jordan, only some 7% of whom were allowed back. Refugee camps around Jericho hosting those ethnically cleansed in the Nakba were themselves emptied.

At the end of June 1967, UNRWA’s Commissioner General told the General Assembly that “the Jericho area” had seen a 90% drop in the population. A September 1968 item in The New York Times observed that Israel appeared “to have finished clearing Arabs from areas they regard as sensitive from a security point of view”. The Jordan Valley ended up suffering “the highest population loss in the entire West Bank in the war and its aftermath”.

The contemporary reality of Israel’s colonisation of the Jordan Valley, and its impact on the indigenous Palestinian population, has been well documented by the PLO’s Negotiations Affairs Department, as well as groups like Oxfam, B’Tselem, and the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Netanyahu’s claims about security are transparently disingenuous – and yet another indication that the Palestinian ‘state’ in the making – if there is one at all – is destined to be a fenced-in Bantustan.

The Jordan Valley’s high ridges provide Israel with a natural security barrier.

Israel-Palestinian talks: Why fate of Jordan Valley is key

By Yolande Knell, BBC News
November 06, 2013

Rows of date palms stand sentinel across the vast, flat stretch of land along the border between the West Bank and Jordan. The view is dotted by dozens of Israeli settlements and Palestinian villages.

This is the Jordan Valley, captured by Israel during the 1967 Six Day War, most of it now still under Israel’s military and administrative control.

However the fertile, largely undeveloped strip – which makes up a quarter of the West Bank – would form an integral part of a future Palestinian state if the Palestinians have their way. Israel, on the other hand, says it cannot give up the valley for reasons of security.

Peace talks which resumed in August are being held in secrecy, but the fate of the valley is said to be one of the points on which Israeli and Palestinian negotiators are struggling to find a compromise.

At a Palestinian family farm in Jiftlik the date harvest is just finishing.

Teenagers reach up from a platform to shake the ripe fruits from each tree while their elders sort them into crates.

The farm’s owner, Hazaa Daragma, tells me his date production suffers because of the Israeli occupation.

“The Israeli farmer has more benefits than the Palestinian farmer,” he says. “He has water and resources. He gets government services and marketing. He sells his dates to Europe. We can’t export so we just get a low price in the West Bank.”

Israel controls all crossing points between it and West Bank, making it by-and-large not economically viable for Palestinians to directly export their produce. Many sell their produce to Israeli companies, or rely on just trading within the West Bank itself.

Hazaa’s father, Majid, who is in his 80s, remembers better times when he cultivated crops by the River Jordan before the land there was confiscated and turned into an Israeli military zone.

“We used to have a lot of land. Now we have a small amount and they are surrounding us more and more,” he says.

Line of defence

The settlements are widely seen as a breach of international law, although Israel rejects this.

The first ones in this border area were set up with national security in mind. The valley is now home to about 9,000 settlers and 56,000 Palestinians.

“We are the people that the government sent to settle the Jordan Valley,” says David Elhayani, who chairs a regional council, representing more than 20 settlements.

“As a Jew, I tell you we can’t take any risks. The Jordan Valley has to remain under Israeli sovereignty. I’m not talking about our claims from the Bible. I’m talking about safety. By staying here we protect the people in Tel Aviv and all of Israel.”

“Something will happen between the Arab countries and Israel, this will be the defence line.”

Israeli soldiers can be seen on patrol near the border, and there are signposts warning of the presence of landmines.

Israeli border authorities also control Allenby Bridge, the only crossing to Jordan that can be used by Palestinians with West Bank ID.

Economic importance

The absence of information from inside the talks has not stopped the leaders on both sides from restating their long-held positions concerning the Jordan Valley.

In October, on the anniversary of the assassination of one of his predecessors, Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a Knesset meeting, “Our strength is the guarantee for our existence and peace… This requires a security border in the Jordan Valley, as Rabin said in his last speech.”

Previously the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had addressed graduates from a new police academy in Jericho.

“The eastern borders of the Palestinian state, stretching from the Dead Sea, through the Jordan Valley and the central highlands, to the borders of Bisan [Beit Shean in northern Israel] are Palestinian-Jordanian borders and will remain so,” he said.

The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, who comes from Jericho, took foreign diplomats and reporters on a tour of the valley, stressing its economic importance.

A recent report by the World Bank calculated that the Palestinian economy would be boosted by $918m (£576m) a year if it could exploit Dead Sea minerals in the southern Jordan Valley.

A further $704m a year could be added if it had more access to farmland and water in parts of the West Bank fully controlled by Israel, the report said.

The Jordan Valley makes up the largest single segment of what is known as Area C – Israel’s zone pending a final peace agreement, as defined under the 1993 Israel-Palestinian peace accords.

“In Area C, which is 60% of the West Bank, Palestinians have got to be able step-by-step to develop it,” says Tony Blair, who represents the Quartet of Middle East peacemakers and has been working on a Palestinian economic initiative.

“Along the Jordan Valley you have immensely rich agricultural land. It’s hard to see frankly how in the future you’re going to have a Palestinian state that doesn’t include that.”

Mr Blair has been pressing for an easing of restrictions, such as extending the opening hours of Allenby Bridge.

“What we’ve got to try to do I think, even in advance of final agreement, is to give people on the Palestinian side a sense that the world is changing and that they can see the prospect of a genuine state opening up before them,” he told me.

“Likewise for the Israelis of course [we must show] that the security concerns… are going to be taken account of.”

Regional uncertainties

In previous inconclusive peace talks, it is said a tentative deal was reached on setting up a few Israeli-manned early warning stations in the Jordan Valley.

However Mr Netanyahu is now said to favour a much stronger presence even within the framework of a Palestinian state.

Israeli media report that he plans to build a new security barrier in the Jordan Valley and rejects an idea favoured by his chief negotiator, Tzipi Livni, to introduce international forces to guard the border.

“Our experience has been that international forces just don’t do the job,” says Dore Gold, president of the Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs. He points to the limitations of Unifil, which was given responsibility for the southern Lebanon border after the 2006 war.

“Israel has absolutely nothing against Palestinian economic success and there are agreements we can reach so we can share in the economic potential of this area,” Mr Gold says.

“But giving up the security of the Jordan Valley in a Middle East that’s full of chaos? Who knows what’s going to happen to Syria – maybe we’ll have a new jihad stand to our east – that’s a major worry for the Israeli army today.”

Tensions

In the Jordan Valley, many residents – Israeli and Palestinian – admit to feelings of uncertainty as peace talks continue.

There are regular incidents that highlight the broader struggle over the area.

Demolition orders have forced Palestinians in parts of the Jordan Valley to relocateIn September, the Israeli army demolished the Palestinian village of Khirbet al-Makhlul.Defence ministry officials say construction there was unlicensed and Israel’s Supreme Court had rejected a petition against the demolition orders.

However the action was internationally condemned. Human rights groups say it is almost impossible for Palestinians in the Jordan Valley to get building permits because of what they say are discriminatory practices – a charge Israel strongly denies.

“When applications are rejected, this is not due to discrimination,” a government official told the BBC. “Building permits are in fact granted to Palestinians in the Jordan Valley when proper requests are made… [but] The Jordan Valley is in part a security-sensitive area, since it is a border zone (with Jordan), and this makes certain areas unsuitable for private development.”

In the village of Abu al-Ajaj, which is still threatened with demolition, an elderly woman, Jamilla Adeis worries for the future.

“The Israelis don’t want us to live here. They want to kick us out and give the land to the settlers so that they can plant dates,” she says gesticulating to the Massua settlement nearby.

Although Palestinian labourers work in the settlements, there is an uneasy relationship between the communities.

And with the murder of an Israeli settler in the Jordan Valley community of Brosh Habika last month, and the arrest of Palestinian suspects, tensions have only increased.

See also Bibi insists on IDF control of Jordan valley – in Rabin’s name

Jordan Valley fence would finalize the West Bank’s complete enclosure

By Haggai Matar, +972, November 4th 2013

In what might be a shot to the heart of current peace negotiations, Netanyahu is reviving plans to build a ‘security fence’ in the Jordan Valley. If the fence follows the original route it will enclose any future Palestinian state, cement impossible Bantustan borders and give birth to a new map of Israel’s borders…..