Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011




Shaked is stirred to charge soldier truth-teller

The Minister of Justice poses for a portrait for The Tablet by Ilia Yefimovich/Getty Images, February 2015.

How Israel Avoided Breaking the Silence About the Occupation

Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked thought she was being smart when she called for an investigation into a member of the anti-occupation group Breaking the Silence. More fool her

By B. Michael, Haaretz premium
November 21, 2017

For some reason, there are those who attribute a considerable amount of intelligence to Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked. There are even those who say she’s smart – but it’s not clear why.

It’s hard to find a lot of intelligence, wisdom or knowledge in the nonsense she spews out every time she pronounces about matters relating to the law, the separation of powers, the High Court of Justice, democracy, “majority rule” and a host of other important subjects.

As if to prove my point, along came the case concerning Dean Issacharoff, a spokesman for the anti-occupation veteran’s group Breaking the Silence.

Issacharoff spoke publicly about how, during his army service, he had brutally beaten a Palestinian detainee. When his remarks surfaced, soldiers from his unit immediately got together and vehemently denied his claim.

You can understand them. After all, each of them has a behind that needs covering, lest they too become suspect.

Then Justice Minister Shaked entered the picture and demanded an investigation so Issacharoff could be put on trial.

So the world could see how moral our army really is. So those Breaking the Silence people would learn that they too will be brought to account.

“Oy vay!” was no doubt the worried utterance echoing through the corridors of the State Prosecutor’s Office.

One can also assume that a number of people there went pale upon hearing such ministerial drivel.

That’s all they need: the civil trial of an occupying soldier who freely admits to abuse. A defendant who would doubtless take advantage of such a prominent legal platform to generate headlines with an account of routine military brutality.

Lawyers would enlist more and more witnesses to testify about how the authorities turned a blind eye. Public debate would confirm the countless reports – both Israeli and Palestinian – of daily beatings, serial humiliations and overt abuse. After all, one soldier had already confirmed Issacharoff’s account, and this would just be the beginning.

The situation that ensued became the height of absurdity: a suspect who openly confessed to his deeds, ready to stand trial, being pitted against law enforcement officials who were prepared to do everything in their power to foil his plans.

No one would have been surprised if the prosecution even considered arguing that Issacharoff’s confession was secured through torture and was therefore inadmissible.

Ultimately, a brilliant idea was born: Bring in Issacharoff’s supposed victim, who could say he hadn’t actually been beaten up that much – and if the scoundrel refused, he could be sent to skilled interrogators, who could beat him until he admitted he hadn’t been beaten.

In a flash, an appropriate Palestinian was found, who uttered just what was hoped for, even adding his own educated opinion about the reasonableness of the assault – as if he himself were actually a spokesman for the Justice Ministry’s police misconduct unit.

And then something truly historical happened: For the first time ever, the state prosecution gave credence to a Palestinian witness, favouring his account over that of an Israeli soldier.

Until now, the Israeli legal system has always taken the view that the confession is the “queen” of all evidence. Ninety percent of all convictions in the colonial courts have been based on such a queen. And then everything was overturned – a revolution! In Issacharoff’s honour, the queen was ejected from her royal throne and her sceptre handed to one of the natives. Amazing. That never would have happened at Israel’s Ofer Military Court in the West Bank. They never would have agreed to create such a dangerous precedent.

But now, at last, we can breathe easy. There will be no trial. The silence has not been broken. The file on another abusive Israeli soldier has been closed, as per usual. And there’s even a bonus: the entire Breaking the Silence organization can be accused of lying.

Here is the story in a nutshell: The Justice Ministry threw a stone into a swamp. The sages at the State Prosecutor’s Office all rushed into the mud to retrieve it. They managed, just about, to calm the ripple of the waves a little. But it will take many years before they manage to cleanse themselves of all the mud that has stuck to them. From the morass of politicization, flattery, panic, cloying obedience and utter negligence.

See also:
Justice minister seeks war crime probe of leftist NGO activist, TOI, June 07, 2017 (when the story first emerged)

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.