Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Archives

US punishes PNA for taking Israel to court

The article by Shlomo Eldar is followed by one from Ynet which is more optimistic about the relationship between the US and PLO.


Rex Tillerson after he was sworn in in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Feb. 1, 2017. Delivering ‘the deal’ has gone from J. Kushner to Greenblatt to Tillerson. Now punishing the Palestinian National Authority for their presumption has kicked a deal into a filing cabinet. Photo by AP.

Palestinians point finger at Israel for crisis with US

Palestinians blame Israel’s ambassador to the United States for acting to close the PLO Washington office.

By Shlomi Eldar, Al Monitor
November 20, 2017

The Palestinians were shocked to receive US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s message about the intentions of the United States to close the PLO’s office in Washington unless progress was made in the diplomatic negotiations on Nov. 18.

Tillerson’s threat came on the heels of a Palestinian attempt to bring high-ranking Israeli officials to trial for war crimes in the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had called on the ICC on several occasions to investigate acts carried out by Israel in Gaza and the West Bank. And in February 2017 — as a response to Abbas’ reaction to the Regularization Settlement Law adopted by Israel — the Americans threatened to impose sanctions on the Palestinians. These sanctions would include the closure of the PLO office in Washington should the Palestinians dare turn to the ICC.

After the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accord in the White House, a law was passed by Congress that permitted the PLO to open an office in the American capital but stipulated that the US State Department would be allowed to close the office should the Palestinians operate against Israel in the ICC.

In the course of White House contacts with Abbas’ office and the attempt to re-start diplomatic negotiations with Israel, an agreement was reached: The Palestinians would freeze all their activities in the international forum and wait for the consolidation and completion of an American diplomatic initiative. This is also known as the “ultimate deal,” as promised by President Donald Trump. According to the US State Department, the Palestinians violated these understandings and are therefore subject to punitive measures.

Until Tillerson’s surprising and unexpected announcement, the Palestinians were convinced that special envoy Jason Greenblatt’s travels to the Middle East, his frequent visits to the Mukataa headquarters in Ramallah, President Trump’s visit to Bethlehem and the hospitality shown to President Abbas in the White House were all positive signs. The Palestinians thought that all this testified to the fact that the Palestinian Authority (PA) had got back on track regarding everything connected to its relations with the American administration, despite the obstacles involved.

In recent months, the Palestinians received messages from Greenblatt that a diplomatic programme based on the two-state solution would be presented shortly. In addition, Abbas’ office received the green light to pursue reconciliation with Hamas after Greenblatt became convinced that Palestinian unity could advance diplomatic moves with Israel, with the support of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.


R, Ron Dermer, Israel’s ambassador to the US, dubbed ‘Bibi’s Brain’ by Politico in this photo by Shahar Azran. To Dermer/Netanyahu, the PNA must not acquire any of the trappings of statehood.

Everything looked wonderful until the American announcement, which caused great consternation in Abbas’ office. In fact, senior Palestinian official Saeb Erekat — who is recuperating at home in Bethlehem from a lung transplant he underwent in Washington about a month ago — was interviewed by Israel Public Broadcasting Corporation. Erekat harshly told his interviewers,

“If they close our offices, we’ll cut off all ties with the United States. This is very unfortunate and simply unacceptable. This [indicates] pressure on the part of Netanyahu’s government at a time in which we are trying to bring about peace and the ‘ultimate deal.’”

Tillerson had not played a large role in American dealings with Israel and the Palestinians. Instead, the deal-closer job had been accorded to Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Greenblatt. That is why the Palestinians are convinced that Tillerson’s threats must be the doings of Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer.

“We know for sure that your ambassador has been working for many weeks on members of Congress and the [US] State Department to bring about the closure of the office in Washington,” a high-placed Palestinian source told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. According to the source, Palestinian Ambassador Husam Zomlot sent reports in real-time that Dermer was conducting an “ugly and manipulative” struggle against the Palestinian office in Washington and tried to convince officials in the administration to close the office or at least curb Zomlot’s activities in the capital.

PLO office in DC

Israel responded only laconically to the report about the Palestinian office in Washington. The prime minister’s office released the following brief message: “This is connected to an American law. We appreciate the decision and look forward to continued work with the United States in promoting peace and security in the region.”

Simultaneously, Israeli ministers were instructed not to give interviews on the topic due to its sensitivity.

“The [Israeli] goal is to drive even more spokes into the wheel [of peace], to continue to sabotage progress in the negotiations,” claimed the Palestinian source. He added that the Israeli response is an attempt to show that the country was not involved [in the American threats], but “all the activities [against the Palestinian office] bear the fingerprints of the ambassador in Washington.”

According to an Israeli diplomatic source who spoke to Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity, there was nothing inappropriate about the behaviour of Dermer. The source held that Dermer was justifiably acting to thwart Palestinian attempts to slander Israel: in The Hague, in UN institutions in New York or anywhere else in the world. “That is exactly the job of an ambassador — to act on behalf of his country’s interests. If indeed he was the one who convinced the US State Department to raise the red flag [to the Palestinians], we should congratulate him for that,” said the source.

The Israeli source added that it would be an exaggeration to think that Tillerson’s threats on the Palestinians are only the results of Israeli diplomatic activity. “A number of factors led the State Department to probe the functioning of the PLO office in Washington and the damage it’s causing to the peace process,” he said.

In this whole hullaballoo, Greenblatt’s deafening silence is extremely salient. Usually he sends tweets over every activity or meeting connected to his work. Ever since Trump sent Greenblatt to the Middle East as an emissary, Greenblatt has been trying to create a positive working atmosphere with the Palestinians. His goal is to assuage their suspicions of Trump and show them that the Trump administration is, indeed, an “honest broker.” But just when it seemed that the sides had begun to trust one another, along came the American threat.

The Palestinians reckon that Greenblatt was not involved in consultations on the matter nor in the decision to threaten the Palestinians, and that’s why he hasn’t said a word about it as of yet.

Despite Palestinian agitation and the threats uttered by Erekat, the Palestinians don’t really intend to go ballistic over the American threat. Al-Monitor has recently discovered that head of Palestinian intelligence Majid Faraj will be sent to Washington in the coming days to resolve the crisis. But it does seem that it will take a long time to fix the cracks that opened up this week in the very complex relations between the PNA and the Trump administration.

When asked about the Palestinian allegation, the Israeli Embassy in Washington offered no comment.



Trump and Abbas shake on the hands on a forthcoming deal, May 2017. Photo from CNN.

Palestinians ‘freeze’ meetings with US, accuse Netanyahu of pressuring DC

Palestinian move in response to US decision to close PLO office in DC; top Palestinian diplomat Erekat says US move the result of ‘pressure by the Netanyahu government at a time we are trying to cooperate the achieve “the ultimate deal.”‘

By Ynet & AFP
November 21, 2017

The Palestinians have made good on their vow to freeze all meetings with the United States, after the US decided to close the Palestinians’ representative office in Washington, officials said on Tuesday.

“What is the use of holding any meetings with them when they close our office? Our meetings begin from our office, and the arrangements are there,” Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Malki stated.”In practice by closing the office they are freezing all meetings and we are making that official.”

A spokesman for the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) confirmed that it had received instructions from Palestinian Authority President Mahmud Abbas “regarding closing down all communication lines with the Americans”.

The US consulate in Jerusalem declined to comment on Tuesday, instead referring back to a statement on Saturday, which said it was hopeful that any “closure will be short-lived.” It further stressed that “we are not cutting off relations with the PLO.”

The PLO, which the international community sees as representing all Palestinians, must have its permission to operate premises in the US capital renewed by the State Department every six months. Last week, however, the department refused to renew its permit.

A State Department official stated that in September, Abbas crossed the line by calling on the International Criminal Court (ICC) to prosecute Israelis, thereby bringing about the US’s decision to not to renew the permit: this in light of a 2015 US Congress provision that says Palestinians may not try to influence the ICC concerning investigations into Israelis.

In actuality, it was US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson who determined last week that the Palestinians ran afoul by trying to get theICC to prosecute Israelis.

Top Palestinian official Saeb Erekat responded in a video to the US “This is very unfortunate and unacceptable. This is pressure being exerted on this administration by the Netanyahu government at a time we are trying to co-operate the achieve ‘the ultimate deal.'”

It is worth noting that the US’s declaration does not automatically mean the mission will close: Trump has a 90-day window to decide whether “the Palestinians have entered into direct, meaningful negotiations with Israel”—in which case he can waive the requirement to shutter the office.

Even if the office closes, the US said it wasn’t cutting off relations with the Palestinians and was still focused on “a comprehensive peace agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians.” A State Department official said in an email that “this measure should in no way be seen as a signal that the US is backing off those efforts.” The official wasn’t authorized to be identified by name and requested anonymity.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.