Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

All aboard for a new Likud


‘New Likud’ grew out of the July/August 2011 social justice movement which created a tent city on Rothschild Boulevard, Tel Aviv [above] and spread to many other towns and cities. Activists decided working from within would be more effective than street protest. Photo by Oren Ziv

Outsiders target Israeli Likud Party’s agenda

The organizers of the “New Likud” estimate that some 12,000 people have joined the Likud Party because of them, with the goal of creating a bloc powerful enough to influence the party’s direction from the inside.

By Mazal Mualem, trans.Danny Wool, Al Monitor
August 18, 2017

A young couple in their 30s joined the Likud Party three months ago; they are part of a group that calls itself the “New Likud.” Both voted for the Zionist Camp in the last election, and neither intends to vote Likud in the next election.

Talking to Al-Monitor, the husband said that most of his close friends, who all live in Tel Aviv, have joined the Likud Party in the last few months. “We all identify with the centre-left. I am actually thinking of voting for Meretz in the next election. We just reached the conclusion that the Likud will remain in power in the years to come, so we want to influence it from the inside. We want to choose who will be on its Knesset list and promote our own interests,” he said.

He insisted on anonymity, since the party is taking a variety of measures to block the New Likud phenomenon. Likud officials claim that it is actually a hostile takeover of the party and part of an attempt to remove its leader, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Aug. 14, Maariv newspaper reported that the Likud Party decided to end online registration for the party on its website. In the next few days, the party’s internal court will decide whether to invalidate the party credentials of several prominent members of the New Likud for allegedly acting against the Likud Party from the inside.

The organizers of the New Likud estimate that, because of the initiative, some 12,000 people have joined the Likud, out of 100,000 Likud members. They plan to continue increasing their numbers until the next party primaries. Their goal is to create a bloc powerful enough to influence the party’s direction from the inside and determine who will appear on its Knesset list. Most of these new members have never voted for the Likud, nor do they plan to do so in the future.

The group first became active about six years ago, in the wake of the social protests, when they reached the conclusion that the best way to influence the situation in Israel was through the ruling party. They had no significant impact over the next few years. Only a handful of like-minded people actually joined the Likud, and the party considered them little more than a curiosity. After the Zionist Camp’s defeat in the last election in 2015, however, the New Likud phenomenon began to gather momentum. It has picked up over the last few months, especially among young people, some of whom attended the recent demonstrations outside State Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit’s home, where they called on him to complete the investigations into Netanyahu’s affairs.

Suddenly, the Likud discovered that a well-organized and powerful new group had been formed right under their noses, and that it was not following the party’s current codes of behaviour. Coalition chairman David Bitan realized that launching a campaign against the group would have enormous media potential, so he decided to declare war against it. In interviews with the press, he accused the New Likud of launching a hostile takeover bid with the intention of toppling Netanyahu. He then announced that the appropriate steps will be taken to distance them from the party. “The Likud has a right to defend itself,” he told Radio Kan Bet. “If we need to amend the party’s constitution, we will. There is no reason for the Likud to accept people who are not Likud, just because they disguise themselves as Likud.”

Bitan is wrong in claiming that the group wants to bring down Netanyahu for its own reasons. What the New Likud wants to do most of all is to advance the interests of young members of the middle class who serve in the reserve forces and bear the burden of paying taxes. In the last election, they named Knesset members Gilad Erdan and Yoav Kish on their list of recommended candidates. On the other hand, Bitan is totally right that having so many people identified with the left joining the party is a serious distortion of the Likud, since they do not identify with its values and goals.

Following Bitan’s attack, the New Likud’s Facebook page was made private, and posts began to include recommendations on how members could dispel insinuations against them. One post said that the purpose of the New Likud was to influence the election of the Likud’s Knesset list in the next election. According to a New Likud source, one post read, “We are a large and united group with a common agenda based on the Likud’s constitution, with an active influence on the party’s discourse and the decisions that are made.” They also attempted to dispel accusations that the New Likud’s members lean to the left. On the other hand, while some of the group’s founders, such as Lior Meiri, do have ties to the Likud, the vast majority of its members has no commitment to the party.

The New Likud phenomenon is reminiscent of the Feiglinites, a far-right group that attempted to take over the Likud in the early 2000s to prevent diplomatic concessions that would include a withdrawal from some of the territories. Then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, and later Netanyahu, fought against them, claiming that they were engaged in a hostile takeover of the party and its institutions. The group had about 7,000 members in its heyday, and it is believed that many of them voted for other parties, mainly on the far right. Despite their strength within the party, the Feiglinites had a hard time getting their leader Moshe Feiglin into the Knesset in the 2013 election.

Though the Feiglinites began as a foreign element within the Likud, over time they became an integral part of the party landscape. This is because many Knesset members asked for their support in the primaries. As far as results, however, the group did not achieve its objectives; it failed to prevent the 2005 disengagement from the Gaza Strip and had no real impact on the party’s agenda. It fell apart before the last election, and most of its members left the Likud.

It is both manipulative and problematic to join a party without identifying with its objectives, and with the sole purpose of changing the very character of the party and influencing it from within. It is the right and even the responsibility of the party to defend itself from organized efforts such as these to change it. The Likud could be flattered that the conventional wisdom is that the party’s internal election is more important than the general election, so much so that even Meretz and Labour Party voters want to participate in its primaries. Nevertheless, they are also right to take steps to defend their party.

It would be wrong to launch a highly publicized campaign to expel thousands of New Likud supporters from the party, nor is there any way to determine who is a “genuine” Likud supporter and who is actually a secret leftist. On the other hand, it is certainly worth considering amending the party’s constitution and introducing a three-year waiting period from the moment someone joins the party until that party member obtains the right to vote within the party’s institutions.



David Bitan has a word in the ear of Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett. Photo by  Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

Likud starts expelling members to stop ‘hostile take-over’

“There is an attempt at a hostile takeover of Likud by people who do not support the party.”

By Gil Hoffman, JPost
August 16, 2017

The Likud removed 10,000 members who had joined other parties from its membership rolls on Tuesday, in an effort to target the “New Likudniks” group that is being accused of trying to move the party’s policies leftward.

It is illegal in Israel to be a member of two parties. Parties usually only examine their membership list and compare it to those of other parties ahead of general elections.

But the Likud administration decided to conduct a special check, as part of its efforts against the New Likudniks. The examination found that there were 5,746 members who were also in the Labour Party, 2,862 in Bayit Yehudi, and a surprising 1,297 who were members of Meretz.

Likud officials said they believed some 2,500 of the members expelled were from the new Likudniks. New ideas to target the group include requiring them to pass a new acceptance committee that would test their suitability for joining Likud.

“There is an attempt at a hostile takeover of Likud by people who do not support the party,” coalition chairman David Bitan said. “They say explicitly that they do not vote Likud. It is a criminal phenomenon and a fraud. A Meretz man cannot put on a costume and vote Likud. We could do the same and take over Meretz.”

Bitan said the New Likudniks want to influence the next Likud Knesset list by electing people who are not real Likudniks or who would damage the party.

He said former Likud MK Moshe Feiglin did the same from the Right, bringing in fervently Orthodox religious Zionists. But he said the New Likudniks phenomenon was larger.


Social Equality Minister Gila Gamliel [above, by Marc Israel Sellem] defended the New Likudniks, saying that they started joining the party after socioeconomic protests that called on the masses to become more politically active. She said she has met with the group and found them to be an honorable group whose ideals fit in the party.

Gamliel said the best comparison of the New Likudniks was not to Feiglin’s group but by the mass membership drive conducted in the early 1990s by an up-and-coming politician named Benjamin Netanyahu.

“They’re authentic socioeconomic activists and the party must be open to them,” she told Army Radio.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.