Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

BSST

BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine
____________________

JfJfP comments


2016:

06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics

2015:

23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo

2014:

15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014

2013:

29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011

_____________________

Posts

Real facts on Gaza’s electricity crisis


The only power plant in Gaza. Photo by Mohammed Asad/MEE

The electricity crisis – FAQS

By Gisha
June 2017

Where does Gaza get its electricity?

Gaza receives electricity from three sources: Israel, which sells Gaza electricity and deducts the payment from the tax money it collects on behalf of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). Gaza’s sole power plant is located near Gaza City, and Egypt.

How much electricity does Gaza currently get?

In past years, and until June 2017, Israel sold Gaza 120 megawatts of electricity; the power plant produced around 60 MW (that is, if enough fuel to operate it came in from Israel through Kerem Shalom), and Egypt provided an additional 28 MW. This brought the daily total to 208 MW.

Since Israel implemented the cabinet’s decision to reduce the supply of electricity sold to Gaza, only 80 MW are provided by Israel. The power plant, which was completely out of commission between mid-April and late June following a dispute between the PA and de facto Hamas authorities in the Strip, has now resumed partial operations using fuel purchased from Egypt. The power plant now operates between two and three turbines, producing between 45 to 70 MW. Egypt provides up to 28 MW, though there have been frequent disruptions on the Egypt lines due to what are described as technical malfunctions.

The electricity currently available to the Strip fluctuates between 125 and 170 MW in total.

This translates to cycles of between four and six hours of power, followed by a 12-hour cut.

How much electricity does Gaza actually need?

Estimates of demand run between 400-500 MW, depending on the time of year and how active industries could be in theory. The normal supply of 208 MW allows for only about eight hours of electricity, followed by eight hours of blackouts, for a total of about 12 hours of intermittent supply per day. So even in “normal” circumstances, Gaza still receives less than half of what it needs.

Without a consistent supply of electricity, it is impossible to provide sufficient health, education and welfare services, to treat sewage, to desalinate water for consumption, to operate household appliances, to have working industries,
businesses and a functioning economy.

Why can’t Gaza produce its own electricity?

From 1967 to 2002, Gaza was dependent on electricity supplied by Israel and Egypt. In 2002, Gaza’s power plant became operational, but it remains the sole power plant for a population of almost two million. The plant’s production capacity was 140 MW when it was built, as it was only meant to provide electricity to Gaza City and its vicinity. At no point was it possible for it to meet the needs of the entire population of the Gaza Strip.

The plant reached production of 90 MW, in 2006. That same year, the power plant was bombed by Israel, destroying six of its transformers and its fuel reservoir. Even after repairs, the plant today is capable of producing around 110 megawatts at most but shortages of fuel, whether because [of lack of ] funding  or of political disputes, have limited the production to around 60 MW.

The power plant depends on the supply of fuel (about 300-350,000 litres of diesel are required daily for the plant to run at this capacity), usually purchased from Israel.

The power plant was again bombed during Operation Protective Edge, in the summer of 2014, its primary fuel reservoir was damaged, and repair was delayed for several years due to Israel’s restrictions on the entry of equipment and parts needed. Gaza’s inability to produce its own electricity in sufficient quantities is a direct result of prolonged Israeli control and restrictions on entrance of materials and equipment, as well as limitations on economic activity.

What is the background of the decision of the PA and Israel to cut the supply of electricity?

Since mid-April and up until the end of June, Gaza’s power plant was completely out of commission. A dispute between the Palestinian Authority and the de facto Hamas authorities over fuel taxation has impeded the plant’s standard operations, since funds donated by Turkey and Qatar designated for purchase of fuel were exhausted. With the power plant not working, Gaza’s already limited electricity supply was cut, leading to power cycles of four hours on, 12 hours off.

With the power plant shut down, Gaza’s only sources for electricity were Israel and Egypt. The PA announced that it no longer wants to pay for the electricity purchased from Israel, and asked Israel to reduce the amount of electricity sold to
Gaza by 40 percent.

On June 11, Israel’s Security Cabinet made a decision to reduce the supply of electricity sold and supplied to Gaza by Israel, in response to the PA’s request. On June 19, Israel began implementing the cabinet’s decision, eventually reducing supply to only 80 MW.

Isn’t it the PA’s decision to cut the supply? What does Israel have to do with it?

Even if the PA asks it to do so, Israel has its hand on the switch and is complicit in and accountable for the devastation that could occur in the Strip as a result of any further interruption in supply. Israel committed before the High Court of Justice to maintain supply of electricity to Gaza in such a way as to not cause a humanitarian crisis.

What are the implications of reducing Gaza’s electricity supply?

Reduction in supply means putting Gaza residents at risk, and subsequently endangering the lives of Israelis as well. It means an impending humanitarian crisis in the Strip. It means a heightened risk of ensuing violence and escalation.

Even prior to the cuts going into effect, 100 million litres of mostly untreated sewage were being pumped from the Gaza Strip into the Mediterranean Sea daily; residents received no more than four hours of electricity at a time, followed by at least twelve hours of blackouts; water desalination stations could not operate; sewage could not be pumped away from residential areas; generators were over-extended; entire hospital wings were shut down during blackouts, and people who rely on life-saving equipment were put at risk.

Reducing the electricity supply could have devastating consequences and greatly exacerbate the situation in Gaza, which is calamitous and unstable as is.

Is Israel obligated to supply Gaza with electricity?

Israel acknowledged that it has a minimal humanitarian obligation to provide electricity and fuel to the Gaza Strip and to refrain from any action that would cause a humanitarian crisis in the Strip, in the framework of a petition filed by Gisha and other human rights organizations against a proposal to cut fuel and electricity supply (HCJ 9132/07 Al-Bassiouni v. Prime Minister). The Supreme Court, in its verdict on the petition, held that Israel retains duties to Gaza, arising from

“…the relationship that was created between Israel and the Gaza Strip after the years of Israeli military rule in the territory, as a result of which the Gaza Strip is currently almost completely dependent upon the supply of electricity from Israel.”

Gisha’s position is that Israel is not just a service provider, responding neutrally to a client’s request. Given its extensive control over life in the Strip, Israel is responsible for enabling normal life for its residents.

Israel is obligated to find solutions that will allow for the continued supply of electricity, and to take active steps toward increasing supply, to allow residents to maintain acceptable living conditions.

What are the obligations of other actors?

All actors involved must refrain from taking steps that would deliberately or inadvertently harm civilians and must not use Gaza residents as bargaining chips in their respective power struggles.

The PA and Hamas should work together to see to the needs and protect the rights of those living under their charge, including by resolving their dispute over taxation of fuel and payment for electricity.

Egypt should work to maintain delivery on the lines it supplies to Gaza.

The international community as a whole should work to support the repair,
maintenance and development of civilian infrastructure in a way that meets the needs of Gaza residents and influence those with direct control over Gaza residents to refrain from taking actions that deliberately or inadvertently harm civilians.

What should Israel and other actors do?

As senior political and military figures in Israel have stated, particularly since 2014,
improving living conditions in Gaza and supporting economic development serves Israel’s interests. In practice, Israel’s policy of restrictions on Gaza contradicts its self-professed interests, putting the region as a whole at risk of another unnecessary round of hostilities.

Instead of using the residents of Gaza as bargaining chips in a power struggle, all actors –Israel, the PA, Hamas, Egypt and the international community – must act immediately to bring Gaza’s infrastructure to a level that meets the needs of its residents.

Why should Israel supply power to Gaza given Hamas is its enemy and is using electricity  for militant activity?

See the question above regarding Israel’s obligations to the civilian population in Gaza. Recall also that Gaza is home to two million Palestinians, not just militants. Israel’s actions can’t deliberately harm the civilian population. Actions which it takes to ensure its security must differentiate between civilians and militants, and also be proportionate. Stopping electricity because it is also used for militant activities meets neither of these tests. It’s too far-reaching (doesn’t respond to a distinct threat) and has massive implications for the civilian population.

How much electricity is being taken underground for Hamas tunnels?

We don’t know. What we do know is that supply falls far short of demand not because electricity is used for militant activity, for that is likely to be  a meagre amount, but because two million people rely on electricity for hospitals, schools, industry and business, agriculture, civilian infrastructure and for home use. Israel also knows this.

That said, Hamas, as the de facto government in Gaza, and the Palestinian Authority, of course also have to be accountable in their actions towards the civilian population and must work to increase supply with all the means at their disposal.

How can I help?

Share Gisha’s information and analysis via Facebook and Twitter

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.