Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters, informing them of issues, events, debates and the wider context of the conflict. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

Action Alert – URGENT


Call on the UK government to act against Israel's incitement in East Jerusalem

The Thirsting for Justice campaign strives to achieve Palestinian rights to water.
Click here to support it


_____________________

Posts

Why G4S should win the award for world’s worst company

Ten reasons to vote for G4S as the World’s Worst Company

By John Grayson and Adri Nieuwhof, Open Democracy
January 10, 2013

The infamous Public Eye award wants your vote on the company that most deserves naming and shaming. Activists from South Yorkshire to the Canton of Vaud are backing security company G4S to win. Here’s why.

War on Want has nominated G4S as the world’s worst company in this year’s Public Eye Awards, an initiative of the Berne Declaration and GreenPeace. The winner of the award for the worst record of corporate human rights abuses and environmental misdeeds will be announced on 24 January at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

The public will decide and competition is tough. Investment bank Goldman Sachs currently leads the voting in a list of finalists that includes energy companies Repower and Shell, South African mining company Lonmin (formerly Lonrho), Coal India and Alstom, the French energy and transport conglomerate.

We are backing G4S, the world’s largest private military and security company, with operations in 125 countries and 657,000 employees, which caught international attention with its shambolic performance as security provider for the London 2012 Olympics.

We are John Grayson and Adri Nieuwhof, activist researchers. UK-based John, working with South Yorkshire Migration and Asylum Action Group (SYMAAG), has chronicled G4S’s attempts to extend its asylum and detention markets into asylum seeker housing.

Adri Nieuwhof, a human rights activist based in Switzerland, monitors and exposes G4S’s role in Israel’s occupation of Palestine.

Here are 10 reasons why we think G4S deserves to win.

Reason One: G4S is privatising warfare

G4S owns the ArmorGroup and has ordinance management operations in 26 countries. Its Gurkha Services arm trains the British army for combat duties. In 2010 and 2012 respectively, the US Senate Armed Services Committee and the UN watchdog Global Policy Forum published criticism of G4S as a military contractor. According to War on Want, the criticism did not stop the British government from extending armed security contracts with G4S in Afghanistan, understood to be worth £72 million.

Reason Two: G4S profits from the Israeli occupation

G4S owns 90 per cent of its subsidiary G4S Israel (Hashmira) which supplies services to the Israeli police, the Ministry of Defense, the Israeli Prison Service, the Israeli army, and the settlement businesses. Over 4,500 Palestinian political prisoners, including 177 children, are held in Israeli jails. Israel transfers Palestinian political prisoners from the occupied territory to prisons in Israel in breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

G4S also provides security services to the detention and interrogation facilities to the “Russian Compound” in Jerusalem and to “al-Jalameh” detention centre in Haifa where Palestinian teens are interrogated. In January 2012, the Guardian reported that Cell 36 of al-Jalameh prison is one of the cells where Palestinian children are locked in solitary confinement for days or even weeks.

According to Defence for Children International Palestine section, in the past 11 years around 7,500 children, some as young as 12 years, are estimated to have been detained, interrogated, and imprisoned in Israeli military and ‘security’ prisons. This averages out at between 500 and 700 children per year.

To investigate the treatment of Palestinian children under Israeli military law, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office commissioned a group of lawyers. In their report ‘Children in Military Custody’ published in June 2012, the lawyers argue that Israel breaches international human rights standards including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Geneva Convention by its treatment of Palestinian child prisoners.

“Thousands of innocent men women and children have been put through the detention wringer.”

Reason Three: G4S has an appalling record running immigration detention, deportation centres and escort services in the UK

In October 2010, Angolan asylum seeker Jimmy Mubenga died under ‘restraint’ by G4S guards contracted to the UK Border Agency. A chilling dossier of evidence entitled Outsourcing Abuse was published by Medical Justice in 2008. In 2011 an international universities research project found that:

“The story of the UK’s immigration detention centres is one of indignity, danger, and misery as catalogued by many authorities. In the UK’s detention centres there have been 16 suicides, alarming rates of self harm, hunger strikes and appalling levels of mental and physical illness. Thousands of innocent men, women and children have been put through the detention wringer.” (1)

Despite damning criticism, G4S continues to run three privatised detention centres in the UK. The company is not scared to profit from controversial public contracts. In October 2012, the Australian Government announced that G4S would manage its off shore asylum processing centre on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea. (2) G4S is also poised, with Serco, to profit from Canada’s ‘crackdown on asylum’ and development of privatised detention centres. G4S already provides security for one of Canada’s Immigration Holding Centres. (3)

Reason Four: G4S and the ‘monstrous’ UK asylum market

G4S makes profits from the UK’s asylum support regime, a “system of institutionalised inhumanity” designed not to support those seeking asylum in the UK, but to deter others from coming to the UK, according to the distinguished immigration barrister Frances Webber in her book Borderline Justice. Webber describes “a monstrous regime of bare subsistence and a deterrent system of coercion, control and stigmatisation”. G4S has extended its interests in these asylum markets with part of a five year UK Border Agency £600 million contracts to control transport, dispersal centres and housing for those waiting for decisions on asylum claims.

“a monstrous regime of bare subsistence and a deterrent system of coercion, control and stigmatisation”

Reason Five: G4S children’s prisons business

G4S pioneered police and prison privatisation in the UK and is poised to profit from the freshly privatised probation market too. At present, the UK has more private prisons than anywhere in Europe, even more than in the US. G4S has run privatised UK children’s prisons or secure training centres since 1998. Fifteen-year-old Gareth Myatt died in April 2004 under ‘restraint’ by G4S staff at Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre near Rugby. There had, for years, been concerns about staff bullies and restraint techniques that caused ‘positional asphyxia’. In a High Court judgment on 11 January 2012, Mr Justice Foskett found it highly likely that large numbers of children were unlawfully restrained in secure training centres run by G4S (and Serco) between 1998 and 2008.

He stated:“The children and young persons sent to [secure training centres] were sent there because they had acted unlawfully and to learn to obey the law, yet many of them were subject to unlawful actions during their detention. I need, I think, say no more.”

Despite its history of abuse at Rainsbrook, G4S runs “a purpose-built mother and baby unit to care for detained young mothers and their babies”.

Reason Six: G4S co-opts and distorts charity

G4S uses charities both as a Trojan Horse to penetrate and control freshly marketised areas of the public sphere, and as a fig leaf covering up human rights abuses against children. G4S is linked up with the UK’s leading children’s charity Barnardo’s in the exploitation of prison and asylum markets. Through this partnership G4S accessed £3m of Big Lottery funding for projects with Barnardo’s at its two private prisons in South Wales. Now G4S and Barnardo’s jointly run the Cedars immigration removal detention centre which continues to lock up children and has been the scene of abuses against migrant families who were deported from the centre.

Charities are now becoming aware of G4S and its abuse of human rights. In Denmark, in September protests resulted in ending their links with G4S. (4) Late in December 2012 two Dutch charities Food Bank Utrecht and Jantje Beton cut their ties with G4S, after they were informed about the abuse of children in Israeli prisons equipped by G4S. (5)

Reason Seven: G4S exploits the ‘revolving door’ for politicians, police and civil servants

G4S has been adept at using business figures, and celebrities to enhance its image and lobbying power. G4S’s latest catch is Adam Crozier, chief executive of the major media group ITV, Crozier previously headed advertising agency Saatchi and Saatchi. No matter how experienced Crozier is, he will not be able to whitewash G4S’s record of corporate human rights abuses. (6) The company has systematically recruited as advisors and board members high profile UK politicians like Lord (John) Reid, former Labour Home Secretary, policemen such as Lord Condon, former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and civil servants. The UK’s ambassador to Libya during the Arab Spring, Richard Northern, was recruited in January 2012 to advise G4S on security business prospects in the region.

Reason Eight: Politicians need to be reminded of G4S’s reality and its corporate human rights abuses

In June 2012, sixty UK Members of Parliament signed a motion to bar firms with dubious human rights records, like G4S, from government contracts. The motion cited the European Parliament’s cancellation of a G4S security contract because of its prison business in Israel.

Since Parliamentary hearings on the Olympics contract, the company has lost UK prison contracts, police contracts and a major contract for assessment of disabled people.

And yet all the three main Westminster parties Conservatives, Liberal Democrat, and Labour, used G4S for security at their annual conferences in the autumn of 2012.

Reason Nine: To remind taxpayers that they are enriching G4S shareholders, and making the company’s executives quite astonishingly rich

G4S funds the development of its prison estate, detention and asylum markets, not from its own private capital, but from taxpayers’ money. There is little risk involved for G4S and income and profits are guaranteed over very long periods.

These public contracts ensure G4S can reward its own ‘fat cats’. G4S chief executive Nick Buckles according to the Annual Report in 2011 gets an annual salary and shares worth £2.4 million and a possible annual bonus of £1.2 million. His pension pot is at present worth £7 million.

Meanwhile, in a G4S mother and baby hostel in Stockton on Tees in the North East of England, under the government’s asylum housing contract, 38 children under one and a half live in what their mothers describe as ‘cells’.

Reason Ten: Your vote will mobilise further protest

Your vote for G4S is a protest against the company’s corporate human rights abuses, and a vote of solidarity with the protests of Palestinian political prisoners and child prisoners in Israeli jails, asylum seekers in UK detention and removal centres, asylum seeker and child prisoner mothers and babies in G4S UK hostels, and a vote of solidarity with all those individuals and organisations campaigning against G4S, the Worst Company in the World.

References:

(1) Melanie McFadyean, Detention is no solution International State Crime Initiative 24 June 2011

(2) G4S may run Manus Island refugee centre The Telegraph (Australia) 15 October 2012

(3) Bilbo Poynter, Private prison firms look to cash in on Canada asylum crackdown The Guardian 29 Novemeber 2012

(4) Adri Nieuwhof, Danish clients dump G4S because of security company’s ties to Israeli occupation, blog The Electronic Intifada, 28 September 2012

(5) Adri Nieuwhof, Dutch charities spurn G4S cash over abuse of Palestinian children,  Electronic intifada blog 24 December 2012

(6) Angela Monaghan, G4S appoints ITV’s Adam Crozier to its board The Telegraph 18 December 2012

See also: Adri Nieuwhof, Palestinian children testify about cruel treatment by Israeli soldiers in new short film, blog The Electronic Intifada, 14 October 2012.

We are John Grayson and Adri Nieuwhof, activist researchers. UK-based John, working with South Yorkshire Migration and Asylum Action Group (SYMAAG), has chronicled G4S’s attempts to extend its asylum and detention markets into asylum seeker housing

Adri Nieuwhof, a human rights activist based in Switzerland, monitors and exposes G4S’s role in Israel’s occupation of Palestine.

Print Friendly

Comments are closed.