Website policy

We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.


BSST is the leading charity focusing on small-scale grass roots cross community, anti poverty and humanitarian projects in Israel/Palestine

JfJfP comments


06 May: Tair Kaminer starts her fifth spell in gaol. Send messages of support via Reuven Kaminer

04 May: Against the resort to denigration of Israel’s critics


23 Dec: JfJfP policy statement on BDS

14 Nov: Letter to the Guardian about the Board of Deputies

11 Nov: UK ban on visiting Palestinian mental health workers

20 Oct: letter in the Guardian

13 Sep: Rosh Hashanah greetings

21 Aug: JfJfP on Jeremy Corbyn

29 July: Letter to Evening Standard about its shoddy reporting

24 April: Letter to FIFA about Israeli football

15 April: Letter re Ed Miliband and Israel

11 Jan: Letter to the Guardian in response to Jonathan Freedland on Charlie Hebdo


15 Dec: Chanukah: Celebrating the miracle of holy oil not military power

1 Dec: Executive statement on bill to make Israel the nation state of the Jewish people

25 Nov: Submission to All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism

7 Sept: JfJfP Executive statement on Antisemitism

3 Aug: Urgent disclaimer

19 June Statement on the three kidnapped teenagers

25 April: Exec statement on Yarmouk

28 Mar: EJJP letter in support of Dutch pension fund PGGM's decision to divest from Israeli banks

24 Jan: Support for Riba resolution

16 Jan: EJJP lobbies EU in support of the EU Commission Guidelines, Aug 2013–Jan 2014


29 November: JfJfP, with many others, signs a "UK must protest at Bedouin expulsion" letter

November: Press release, letter to the Times and advert in the Independent on the Prawer Plan

September: Briefing note and leaflet on the Prawer Plan

September: JfJfP/EJJP on the EU guidelines with regard to Israel

14th June: JfJfP joins other organisations in protest to BBC

2nd June: A light unto nations? - a leaflet for distribution at the "Closer to Israel" rally in London

24 Jan: Letter re the 1923 San Remo convention

18 Jan: In Support of Bab al-Shams

17 Jan: Letter to Camden New Journal about Veolia

11 Jan: JfJfP supports public letter to President Obama

Comments in 2012 and 2011



Flotilla 2: preparing for the violence expected from Israel’s masked men

Of course Flotilla is Political Provocation
By Joe Catron
As the launch of the Freedom Flotilla – Stay Human approaches, increasing numbers of Zionist officials and commentators illuminate the depths of their moral and intellectual bankruptcy by arguing that it is a political – not humanitarian – project.
Ran Curiel, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, offers an example as good as any other. On May 10, he actually went to the trouble of calling a press conference in Strasbourg to offer this conclusion. “In our view, the flotilla is clearly a political provocation … since there’s no need for a flotilla to aid Gaza,” he said. “You can pass whatever you want to Gaza through normal channels.”
Curiel’s reasoning leaves much to be desired. Nobody seems entirely clear on what can enter Gaza through his “normal channels,” namely the Erez Crossing, and a large majority of its necessities continue to arrive at a high premium via tunnels from Egypt. And humanitarian opposition to the siege has always had more to do with its crippling effect on Gaza’s economy than its obstruction of aid. Due to the impossibility of legally importing most goods, or exporting nearly anything, unemployment now reaches 45%, and 300,000 people survive on a dollar a day.
Nevertheless, his conclusion is sound, if self-evident. The Freedom Flotilla is indeed “a political provocation.” Why shouldn’t it be? And when has it pretended to be anything else?
Like its predecessors, from the successful Free Gaza boats of 2008 to the Freedom Flotilla that suffered lethal violence by Israeli commandos in international waters last year, this Flotilla is an unabashed act of solidarity with a people fighting colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and apartheid.
The Flotilla targets the denial of Palestinian self-determination, not a humanitarian crisis. It aims to break the siege, not only because the siege causes hardship for Palestinians, but also because it obstructs their inherent rights to determine their collective destiny, and that of their historic homeland. The goal is not a reliable flow of international charity, or even a functional economy, but rather Palestinians’ sovereignty over their own coasts and territory.
Efforts to obscure these obvious truths, by holding the Flotilla to some other standard that it has never aspired to meet, are part of a Zionist “big lie,” a myth that its tellers hope will carry the weight of truth because its listeners believe it.
Zionists would have us accept that any effort not loyal to their regime must be apolitical and rooted only in charitable impulses. In the narrative they hope to spread through their frequent observations of the obvious, theirs is the only acceptable side, and strict neutrality the only possible alternative. Nothing else may exist within the strict parameters of thought and action they seek to impose.
But let there be no mistake: All of us who are part of the Flotilla effort, in ways great and small, have chosen a side, and it is not theirs. We stand with the people of Palestine in their struggle for equality and self-determination. And unlike architects of Operation Cast Lead and apologists for the Nakba, we have nothing to hide.
Flotilla organizers have hardly kept this a secret. In a June 24 statement, the Free Gaza Movement “reiterate[d] that our effort is not simply about delivering humanitarian aid. The goal of the Flotilla is not aid; it is freedom for Palestinians in Gaza and the rest of the occupied Palestinian territories. As such, there are no ‘established channels’ for freedom – there is only one – an end to the Israeli occupation.”
In more ways than one, Zionists criticizing the Flotilla as a “political provocation” share the mentalities of those who condemned the Salt Satyagraha or the Montgomery Bus Boycott for similar reasons. These efforts were also indisputably political and provocative; salt marchers could have simply paid the British tax, while Rosa Parks would actually have reached her destination more quickly by moving to the back of the bus. That these, too, were “political provocations” is equally obvious, and no less beside the point.
And the point, for the Freedom Flotilla, the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, and countless related efforts to rally support for embattled Palestinians, is one of solidarity with a liberation struggle, not charity for helpless victims. As the late Juliano Mer-Khamis told The Electronic Intifada about his own Jenin Freedom Theatre:
“We are joining, by all means, the struggle for liberation of the Palestinian people, which is our liberation struggle. Everybody who is connected to this project says that he feels that he is also occupied by the Zionist movement, by the military regime of Israel, and by its policy. Either he lives in Jenin, or in Haifa, or in Tel Aviv. Nobody joined this project to heal. We’re not healers … We are freedom fighters.”
His words also describe Flotilla participants, and growing millions of supporters of the Palestinian cause. Yes, out solidarity is political. Yes, it is provocative. And unlike the racism and oppression of Zionism and its enablers, there is nothing shameful about it.

Joe Catron is a resident of Brooklyn, New York and a current member of the International Solidarity Movement – Gaza Strip. He writes in a personal capacity. Catron contributed this article to

Staying Human: Preparing to Sail to Gaza


The US ship will bring over 3,000 letters of support.


By Kathy Kelly


Last week, newly-arrived in Athens as part of the US Boat to Gaza project, our team

of activists gathered for nonviolence training. We are here to sail to Gaza, in

defiance of an Israeli naval blockade, in our ship, “The Audacity of Hope.” Our

team, and nine other ships’ crews from countries around the world, want Israel to

end its lethal blockade of Gaza by letting our crews through to shore to meet with

Gazans. The US ship will bring over 3,000 letters of support to a population suffering

its fifth continuous decade of de facto occupation, now in the form of a military

blockade controlling Gaza’s sea and sky, punctuated by frequent deadly military

incursions, that has starved Gaza’s economy and people to the exact level of cruelty

considered acceptable to the domestic population of our own United States, Israel’s

staunchest ally.


The international flotilla last year was brutally attacked and the Turkish ship

fired on from the air, with a cherrypicked video clip of the resulting panic presented

to the world to justify nine deaths, one of a United States citizen, most of them

execution-style killings. So it’s essential, albeit a bit bizarre, to plan for how

we will respond to military assaults. Israeli news reports say that their naval

commandos are preparing to use attack dogs and snipers to board the boats. In the

past, they have used water cannons, taser guns, stink bombs, sound bombs, stun guns,

tear gas, and pepper spray against flotilla passengers. I’ve tried to make a mental

list of plausible responses: remove glasses, don life jacket, affix clip line which

might prevent sliding off the deck, carry a half onion to offset effect of tear

gas, remember to breathe.


Israel Defense Forces are reportedly training for a fierce assault intended to “secure”

each boat in the flotilla, the “Freedom Flotilla 2″. As passengers specifically

on the U.S. boat, we may be spared the most violent responses, although Secretary

of State Hillary Clinton has not ruled out such violent responses and has preemptively

certified any response we may “provoke” (in sailing from international waters to

a coastline that is not part of Israel) is an expression of Israel’s “right to

defend themselves”. Israel says it is prepared for a number of scenarios, ranging

“from no violence” (which it knows full well to expect) to “extreme violence”. We

are preparing ourselves not to panic, and to practice disciplined nonviolence whatever

scenario Israel decides to enact.


If they overcome our boat swiftly, they will presumably handcuff us and possibly

hood us, before commandeering our ship toward an Israeli port, removing us from

the ship, jailing us and (judging from their past actions) deporting us. I don’t

know what country I would be deported to, but I would eventually return to the U.S.

and to my home city of Chicago, and to a safety I cannot share with the desperate

people of Gaza, or friends from throughout this region so troubled by war, much

of it instigated by my own country.


The slogan of our flotilla is “Stay Human.” It’s advice that exposure to violence,

real or imagined, always tempts us to forget. Young friends I have met in Afghanistan,

faced with pervasive everyday precarity I cannot easily imagine, have expressed

this idea in a YouTube video []

which utterly takes my breath away. They ask Gazan youth to hold on to hope and

to the capacity for childlike joy: “To friends in Gaza: don’t stay angry for too

long, Stay together, and love from us in Afghanistan!”


My fellow passenger John Barber recently visited Gaza, and this morning he told

me a harrowing story of a Gazan family, that of a farmer named Nasr, living near

the Gazan-Israeli buffer zone. The first attack took place in June of 2010. To

quote John’s website:  “…the Israeli army attacked the family home while the children

were playing outside…Nasr’s wife, Naama, was in the front yard when a tank 500

meters from the home fired shells packed with nails at the home. Nasr’s wife, torn

to ribbons, bled to death in the yard when ambulances were not permitted down the

narrow dirt road to his home.” Ambulance stoppages are a frequent punitive measure

used against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.”


“After the second attack,” which occurred in April 2011, “Nasr’s family moved to

a house in the village, near to the cemetery where his wife was buried. One night,

around midnight, Nasr woke to find his children gone. He went outside and found

them at their mother’s grave.” The next day he took them away from that village

and back to their land, to try and put the past behind them, and await a future

they can barely hope will be kind.


I hope that our ship will make it to Gaza. I hope Johnny Barber can again visit

Nasr, and that I can visit the family and the trapped young men who sheltered me

during the final days of the crushing December 2008 “Operation Cast Lead” bombardment.

I hope that our ship will make it out of dock – acting on an “anonymous complaint,”

the government here has demanded an inspection of several days before they will

allow our (entirely seaworthy) ship to sail. With its world-headline-producing economic

troubles, Greece seems incredibly vulnerable to the intense pressure that the Israeli

and U.S. governments seem openly prepared to exert: we hope that neither economic

nor political blackmail will succeed at stopping our ship from leaving the spot

near Athens where it is waiting to receive us.


“Please don’t lose the human capacity for happiness.” My Afghan friends in the video

urge us to stay human. Ali, who speaks in the video, has been harassed by Afghan

security forces since becoming active with the Afghan Youth Peace Volunteers. So

has his family. Others of his companions have faced death threats, interrogation,

arson and theft.  Their persistence encourages and guides me, and I struggle to

let their persistence urge me on, because staying human is also about doing what

is right.


I think of Nasr’s children watching their mother die, and I think that if they’re

going to stay human then I and my countrymen and women ought to help. We have to

become more human than we’ve so far managed to be: We have to make sacrifices to

stop the crimes that are ultimately being committed in our names. In different ways,

we have to risk the consequences of being where we need to be when we need to be

there. We have to stand up to injustice and with the victims of injustice, and

rely on our opponents to find their humanity in time, given enough examples of what

it can look like. When we find ourselves, against all odds, staying human, that

example surprises us and helps sustain us in hope for the power of humanity. We

hope we will be allowed through to Gaza, we hope that the siege will be lifted,

and that in this time when humankind can so little afford the nightmares of greed

and ignorance that rend the Middle East and that render our leaders incapable of

uniting to address ever-more desperate, ever-more-frightening global crises, we

as a species, one with no assurance of its perpetual survival, will somehow find

some way to stay human.


Kathy Kelly co-coordinates Voices for Creative Nonviolence. She contributed this

article to



Despite pressure and threats of violence, flotilla will sail


Huwaida Arraf, Athens +30-694-781-5798

Greta Berlin, Athens +33 607 374 512

On Saturday, 25 June, the French boat, Dignity / Karama, left the port of l’ile Rousse in Corsica, France, to meet up with at least nine other vessels sailing to Gaza to challenge Israel’s illegal blockade. Israel’s best efforts to stop our boats at port, including pressure on governments, threats against insurance and communications companies, intimidation of human rights defenders, frivolous lawsuits and other underhanded tactics, have thus far failed. The Freedom Flotilla has set sail.

In the coming days the rest of the vessels in the flotilla, two cargo ships and seven other passenger boats, will leave from various ports to a meeting point in international waters from which the boats will sail all together towards Gaza. We will carry nearly three thousand tons of aid and hundreds of civilians from dozens of countries, including members of parliament, politicians, writers, artists, journalists and sports figures, as well as representatives of indigenous peoples and various faith groups.

Unfortunately some of our vessels are facing delays admittedly initiated by bogus complaints from the Israel Law Center, attempted sabotage of some boats, as well as administrative obstacles created by the Greek government in response to Israeli pressure. We call upon the Greek government not to become complicit in Israel’s illegal actions by succumbing to this pressure, and to join France in standing unopposed to the flotilla.

There is no question that Israel’s near hermetic closure of the Gaza Strip is illegal; this has been affirmed again and again by numerous international human rights bodies including the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross. And, when prompted by the flotilla effort, international consensus has been unequivocal in the demand for the Israeli siege to end. There is no question that Israel’s closure policy has had a devastating effect on the occupied people of Gaza. This has also been well documented. The only question is why does the international community of states allow Israel to keep violating the law and rights of the Palestinian people with impunity?

Recent steps taken by Israel to address the concerns raised in the public eye by the Freedom Flotilla II – Stay Human initiative, including last week’s announcement of authorization for construction materials for 1,200 homes and 18 schools in Gaza, prove that flotillas work. However, this is not enough, as our effort is not simply about increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza. It is about freedom for Palestinians in Gaza and the rest of the occupied Palestinian territories. Calls by some world leaders for flotilla organizers to use “established channels” to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza show a fundamental disregard for Palestinian human rights. The Palestinian people do not want handouts from the international community; rather they demand liberation – a call we must all support.

Therefore, despite intimidation, pressure, and threats of violence from the Israeli government, which is not ashamed to boast that it will use snipers and attack dogs against unarmed civilians, we will sail. We are part of a growing movement, led by Palestinian civil society campaigning for their freedom, that Israel’s strong-arm tactics cannot stop. We call on our governments to do their utmost to protect their citizens as we take to the sea, without weapons, protection or threat of force, in defense of freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. Gaza, we are coming.

In preparation for Gaza flotilla, passengers briefed on how to face Israeli soldiers
Gaza-bound: Why exactly would a 70-year-old need this?
By Amira Hass

SOMEWHERE IN GREECE – We’re in the lecture hall in which the people sailing on the Tahrir, the Canadian ship taking part in the Gaza-bound flotilla, are being briefed.
The Tahrir passengers are asked to decide: “Where would you prefer to be when the [Israeli] commandos commandeer the ship?”
Based on the experience of previous Gaza-bound boats, with the exception of the Mavi Marmara, the lecturer presents the options. “On deck you will be exposed to a few minutes of physical violence from the soldiers that will feel like a few hours,” he says.
“From previous experience, the soldiers, en route to the captain’s cabin, will step on people’s heads. You won’t move, but they’ll see you as the aggressor. The commanders know very well that we’re not armed. But the simple soldier has been brainwashed, and he’ll be afraid.”
I take a look at the other people in the room and ask myself, “Why do they need this?”
The oldest person planning to sail on the Canadian vessel is a 77-year-old American woman (not a 69-year-old one, as I mistakenly wrote in yesterday’s article – not even referring to this particular woman ). There’s also another woman and a man over 70, who both smilingly corrected my mistake as well.
There are nine other passengers in their sixties, and many others between 40 and 60.
So why are they doing this?
“I’m appalled, as are many friends and colleagues, by the conditions in Gaza and by the silence of the international community regarding the ongoing blockade in Gaza,” says Lyn Adamson, trying to explain why they are taking this calculated risk.
Adamson, 59, a Quaker from Toronto, is active in a number of social justice advocacy groups.
“In the absence of effective action by the international community to pressure Israel and Egypt to change their policies … we, at the grass roots, must take action,” she says.
The instructor continues to list the positioning options, noting that up on deck the air will be clear because tear gas dissipates quickly.
“By contrast, in a closed cabin, there won’t be direct exposure to the soldiers’ violence, but the tear gas chokes you and disorients you,” he says.
Once the Israel Defense Forces’ boarding is complete, the tow to Ashdod could take seven hours or more, with the soldiers sitting on deck among the activists, say those who experienced last year’s flotilla. They may not let you use the bathroom.
What then? That’s a good question.
Experience has shown that the female soldiers are rougher than the male soldiers. Experience has also shown that some soldiers try to be nice, the instructor stresses.
“It’s true, even though I only saw their eyes,” says a woman who took part in last year’s flotilla. “They were and remained masked. But a few of the soldiers blinked their eyes in a way that I interpreted as friendly, as a desire to calm us down.”
Another instructor says that some of the soldiers might curse the passengers.
“If you tell their commander that you see their commandeering the ship as an act of illegal kidnapping, that’s legitimate,” he says. “But don’t curse back at them. That’s one of the red lines.”
The “red lines” include several rules of behavior that were included in a written pledge of nonviolence, which all participants had to sign.
The rules include: “No initiating physical contact with soldiers, no jumping in the water, no throwing objects at soldiers, no starting fires, no using fire extinguishers against soldiers, no use or display of objects that could be misconstrued as weapons (cameras, etc. excepted ).”


Print Friendly

Comments are closed.