Website policy


We provide links to articles we think will be of interest to our supporters, informing them of issues, events, debates and the wider context of the conflict. We are sympathetic to much of the content of what we post, but not to everything. The fact that something has been linked to here does not necessarily mean that we endorse the views expressed in it.
_____________________

Action Alerts


_____________________

Posts

Labour slammed as anti-Israel

In a quick overview of Jews in Britain Tablet magazine harangues the left for pushing policies against the existence of Israel. In fact, Labour is true to the Balfour declaration (see post) which specified that ‘nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious’ rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country’. Those who appeal to the Balfour declaration appear not to have read it. To criticise the idealised Israel is not to wish for its extermination. Obviously.

Print Friendly

Fifty year Occupation must end says Obama’s fixer

In this new era of undiplomatic hostility between the US and Israeli governments, the President’s Chief of Staff tells the J Street conference that the occupation – yes, he used the word – must end and that negotiating with Iran was the best and proper way to contain Iran’s supposed ambitions.

Print Friendly

Israel spies on its patron to scupper Iran talks

Netanyahu’s whole premiership and successful election campaign were based on tales of an imminent threat from Iran. He is now furious, not so much at the P5 talks with Iran but that Israel’s security is not the defining issue in those talks. WSJ reveals the extent of the snooping.

Print Friendly

US-Israel split widens

The US-Israel relationship was poor before the election, made worse by Netanyahu’s visit to Congress and plunged after he promised there would never be a Palestinian state. Barak Ravid explores the growing chasm.

Print Friendly

US unlikely to endorse Netanyahu’s stance on Palestinian state

For the first time ever, the US may not back Israel. The Obama/ Netanyahu conflict makes the prospect of UN recognition of a Palestinian most unclear. It was assumed the US would block it at the UN. But such is the hostility between Obama and Netanyahu, this may not happen. What will the rest of the world do without US leadership?

Print Friendly

Bibi sinks to new low to save his skin

Jonathan Freedland may or may not be accurately described as a Liberal Zionist. but here his distress at Netanyahu’s victory is visceral. Jonathan Freedland says Bibi won, in part, by invoking popular fear of The Arab and rejection of a Palestinian state. Thus he pulled in the right-wing vote for Likud. That put him beyond reach of western powers who want to find a way to reconciliation – but will popular opinion respond?

Print Friendly

Voting for security, against religious fringe

If the Israeli election has produced a deluge of articles from the commentariat it has produced few responses from UK citizens. Here are two: Tony Klug argues that Bibi pulled the religious right into his camp to his, and Joint List’s, gain. Simon Kovar says the combined votes produced a higher proportion of votes for a peace settlement than against it.

Print Friendly

An end to the charade called PA

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas prays at the start of a meeting for the Central Council of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, in the West Bank city of Ramallah

Only the Palestinian people, who are politically impotent, have a profound interest in ending the rift between Fatah and Hamas. To the Israelis in particular, and most other actors, the rift is a Godsend. As long as Fatah and Hamas are at war, they need do nothing. Here Daoud Kuttab gives his usual intelligent strategic ideas of the way forward for the PA. In the same issue of Al Monitor is an account of the bitter rivalry with Hamas, where the military wing has gained the upper hand. The Ramallah leaders are not the innocent victim of this – if they had authorised elections, movement might have taken place.

Print Friendly

Bibi gets free hand to solidify Greater Israel

Israeli fears about scary neighbours (and enemies within) won Bibi his victory, which did not surprise Antony Lerman. Now, with the Israeli right-wing behind him and the international community distracted he can focus on denying Palestinian statehood and expanding Israel’s borders. But there was an expectation of change which will suck in other forces.

Print Friendly

Whatever the result, Netanyahu is doomed

In this last posting before the Israeli election results are known, we put forward the assessment by Barak Ravid that, whatever the results, the momentum of the 2011 social protest movement means the cry of ‘security’ is not going to win an election.

Print Friendly

Best news for MidEast would be defeat of intransigent Bibi

Recent decisions – or failure to make them – by the Israeli government have needlessly pushed the conflict into violence. The failure of the Kerry talks – attributed to Israeli bull-headedness and reliance on the IDF – has produced all the results which, in theory Bibi’s regime deplores: lone wolf attacks, anarchy in Jerusalem, a Palestinian turning from negotiations. Well, he asked for it.

Print Friendly

Labour’s Herzog tipped as next PM

From an assured win to a likely loss, the fortune of Binyamin Netanyahu has been assiduously charted by opinion polls in which he is lagging behind Zionist Camp who will have to form a coalition to rule. Herzog’s position on the oPt is not clear. While Bibi focused on security, Herzog and Livni concentrated on economc issues. Ironically, Bibi’s dash to the US to warn them about Iran has backfired. Why does Bibi not focus on the dire standard of living in Israel rather than grandstanding on the anti-war Obama?

Print Friendly

The Netanyahu pantomime

Astonishingly, Bibi’s speech to the US Congress is still garnering comment, again, all of it hostile. ‘A tremendous own goal’ says one, ‘It was just an exercise to paint a straw man and knock it down’ said a senator and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee. And as the anti-Bibi rally showed, the effects are leeching into the election campaign, in exactly the opposite way of his intention. How did he get it so wrong?

Print Friendly

‘Never be the first one to stop clapping’

As most political jouralists seem to have wanted to comment on Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, we’ve made a selection – though it’s been hard to find one that is appreciative. Most support seems to have come from Arab dictatorships who are opposed to Iranian hegemony as Israel.

Print Friendly

Hollow, an insult, no rhyme or reason…

The US divided in the usual way over Netanyahu’s speech; the right melted into rapturous applause, the critics’ verdicts were harsh: Bibi had claimed Americans did not know what was going on in Iran. This was was arrogant, insulting – and pointless.

Print Friendly

Back from the brink or into the abyss?

By the time you read this PM Netanyahu will have delivered his speech to Congress, firming his alliance with Republicans and the fearful/belligerent in Israel. But it’s not over – there will be pages of analysis of what he said. A few drops from the torrent of pre-commentary, including the public opposition from all the security services, from Shin Bet to IDF.

Print Friendly

Netanyahu alienates leaders round the world

Netanyahu’s hectic attempt to make the international headlines are souring his relations with many national leaders. He has broken the bi-partisan support for Israel in the US by accepting a Republican invitation to speak to Congress – but upset many by his rudeness to Americans’ President. He is insulting leaders of European nations by suggesting they cannot protect their Jewish citizens and indeed suggesting Europe should be ethnically cleansed of all Jews – in their own interest of course. He is banking on all this pleasing Israeli voters.

Print Friendly

Compare and contrast Christian antisemitism with Islamist attacks today

In 2015, seven Jews (2 at Charlie Hebdo, 4 at the Hyper-Cacher supermarket, 1 in Copenhagen) were killed by Islamists. The number of non-Jews killed in the same attacks was far higher. In Israel, the number of Jews killed in 2014 by Palestinians was 46. Uri Avnery, doubting the claimed rise in antisemitism, asks why Bibi is making hay out of Jew-killing in Europe and insisting that Israel is their only safe haven.

Print Friendly

War for independence by diplomacy

Palestinians are the forgotten issue of politics – unmentioned in the Israeli election campaigns, let drop by the US and, though European parliaments have been enthusiastic about a Palestinian state, the EU appears to lack the clout to do anything about it. So can Palestinians themselves use diplomacy to press their cause?

Print Friendly

The mote and the beam

Robert Cohen shares the sentiment of our earlier posting on Rev. Stephen Sizer – that he acted foolishly and it was right that we was brought to account. But that’s only half the story. If high ethical standards are applied to the Board of Deputies, who made the complaint, they have many questions to answer on their condoning or turning a blind eye to the wrongs that are carried out by the Israeli state.

Print Friendly